Results 1 to 25 of 4708

Thread: X48 Rampage Formula Preview.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeyakame View Post
    Zucker2k,

    When you've got some time would you be able to run a few scenarios for me with AI Clock Twister settings. It seems like they are giving me fixed values from what is probably a fixed table for each setting. DRAM Clock Skews need to be set to Normal on CHA/CHB and all CPL phase pull ins must be disabled. DRAM Static Read shouldn't affect the the results from what I can tell.

    Values to go here.

    AI Clock Twister
    -Lighter -> -Stronger

    Dimm1 Fine Clock Delay 5T
    Dimm2 Fine Clock Delay 3T
    Dimm3 Fine Clock Delay 5T
    Dimm4 Fine Clock Delay 3T

    Took a lot of samples at PL7/PL8 with all clock twister values and varying Phase pull-ins, and those values appear to be common.

    I have a good 20 or so MCHBAR register dumps to analyze and compare for all the samples I took tonight, which will take me a good week to properly go over and over to isolate particular register values for each change from the changes to counter registers for things like Errors, Load Performance, Bus clock ticks, Transit delays, etc. Intel MCHBAR docs for all chipsets are sort of vague, and for the most part just outline the critical register values with regard to memory timings, memory segment addressing, memory performance counters, and so on.

    There needs to be more people involved to give their values for certain FSBs. The xT or yT is because when I changed from 483MHz FSB to 485MHz FSB the values seemed to get more aggressive. I can't explain this.
    It possibly changes some other hidden MCHBAR registers, but for time being until we can know their locations Dimm Clock Fine Delay seems to be the most useful across the board.

    DRAM Clock Skew
    50PS is equivalent to 1T which may be in UCLKs, differential clocks.

    Advance 50PS = -1T
    Delay 50PS = +1T

    These can be checked with Everest Ultimate Edition under the Dimm1-4 Fine Clock Delay timings in Chipset. Normal is equivalent to the value set by the skew tables for the memory subsystem. This might vary between different Memory Dimm's. I only have 2 sets to test with unfortunately.


    AI Clock Twister also effects AI Transaction Booster when set to Auto. More aggressive AI Clock Twister setting increases likelihood of Phase Pull-Ins for Common Performance level.

    AI Trans Booster AUTO, 5:6 Divider with AI Clock Twister Stronger, CPL 10, Phase Pull-in PHA1
    AI Trans Booster AUTO, 4:5 Divider with AI Clock Twister Stronger, CPL 9, Phase Pull-In PHA1, PHB1
    AI Trans Booster AUTO, 3:4 Divider with AI Clock Twister Stronger, CPL 7, Phase Pull-in PHA1, PHA3, PHB1, PHB3
    AI Trans Booster AUTO, 2:3 Divider with AI Clock Twister Stronger, CPL 6, Phase Pull-in PHA1, PHB1
    AI Trans Booster AUTO, 1:1 Divider with AI Clock Twister Stronger, CPL 5, Phase Pull-in PHA1

    Those are only scenarios I can recall. Its been a while but I am pretty sure thats the values the bios gives.
    Wow, this is a project in itself. I will find time and give you some results soon. Here are my current figures....

    Edit: Clockskew set to normal for all channels, all phases disabled, cpl set to 8; I get the same figures for 8.5x500 fsb ie. 1-5-1-4.

    PS: I'm not sure what impact ai transaction booster has on latencies, but lighter, light, and moderate, reduces Read speed about 300 MB/s and boosts Copy speed by about 1200
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	e42pl8.gif 
Views:	941 
Size:	197.2 KB 
ID:	89434  
    Last edited by Zucker2k; 11-22-2008 at 02:48 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •