Danamics - a revolutionary cooling system?!

**NH|Delph1** · 11-19-2008, 09:27 AM

Don't try to read between the lines, let the numbers do the talking.

We're waiting for the retail unit right now. Neither we nor Danamics wants to stress this so I'm not sure I can promise a review before the weekend.

//Andreas

**Simps** · 11-19-2008, 10:04 AM

I want to see the numbers too.
In my opinion if it beats the current best solution for air, TRUEcu, it will be by 2 or 3C max. I would say it is almost impossible for it be something crazy better then the TRUEcu, like 8 or 9C better. And, there is the possibility that it will not be as good as TRUEcu.

So, reviews are going to be interesting. And of course, we won't be able to thrust a single review. I for one, will only make my mind, after seeing consistent results on several reviews and users reviews and comparisons too.

**cegras** · 11-19-2008, 03:33 PM

Originally Posted by Simps

I want to see the numbers too.
In my opinion if it beats the current best solution for air, TRUEcu, it will be by 2 or 3C max. I would say it is almost impossible for it be something crazy better then the TRUEcu, like 8 or 9C better. And, there is the possibility that it will not be as good as TRUEcu.

So, reviews are going to be interesting. And of course, we won't be able to thrust a single review. I for one, will only make my mind, after seeing consistent results on several reviews and users reviews and comparisons too.

TRUE Cu is only marginally better under load.

**dinos22** · 11-19-2008, 03:37 PM

Originally Posted by NH|Delph1

Don't try to read between the lines, let the numbers do the talking.

We're waiting for the retail unit right now. Neither we nor Danamics wants to stress this so I'm not sure I can promise a review before the weekend.

//Andreas

do you seriously think that someone will actually buy this thing at THAT price lol

i would shoot off an email to them and tell them to send me a testing kit when the price drops to about a quarter of RRP

if i was a reviewer i mean hehe

**nullface** · 11-19-2008, 03:39 PM

Hm, if it performes as highend water, it might aply to some ppl becourse it is very compact, no?

**dinos22** · 11-19-2008, 03:47 PM

high end water is very flexible and upgreadable

most ppl that are thinking of throwing that kind of money on cooling will also cool their GFX cards or NB etc

**NH|Delph1** · 11-21-2008, 09:04 AM

Minor update: Testing retail cooler, review should be up next week. Retail cooler is better than the prototype.

//Andreas

**suddeath** · 11-21-2008, 09:33 AM

Originally Posted by NH|Delph1

Minor update: Testing retail cooler, review should be up next week. Retail cooler is better than the prototype.

//Andreas

Even better sounds good, but can you give us some numbers? Anything?

I can't wait for review.

**Kuroimaho** · 11-21-2008, 11:10 AM

I am also really curious about it but I do not expect much, they need airflow and surface area to dissipate the heat regardless of what transports it to the fins heatpipes or this electromagnetic pump, on the other hand a noiseless pump for a new liquid cooling would really make me jump on it.

**vengance_01** · 11-21-2008, 03:16 PM

can you drop any hints?

**SAE** · 11-21-2008, 03:41 PM

Be patient and let him do his job!^^

**AndrewZorn** · 11-21-2008, 04:01 PM

His job is done, the cooler has been tested. He could have simply announced the results in the same time it took him to post about NOT releasing the results. He wants you to be impatient.

**SAE** · 11-21-2008, 04:20 PM

Originally Posted by NH|Delph1

Minor update: Testing retail cooler, review should be up next week...

Then I must've misunderstood what he was writing^^

I was thinking he still is completing the results and then writing the review... but you might be a psych and know better!

**AndrewZorn** · 11-21-2008, 04:48 PM

Please. We are talking about "is it better than TRUE or water or not"... which he gives a vague answer to. There's not much of a process in saying "it outperformed the TRUE by 10*C"... which is what everyone is waiting to hear.

**SAE** · 11-21-2008, 05:19 PM

He could do, but he clearly stated he would not. So lets show some respect to that man following his principles. I am also totally eager to seeing results here, but I am not a santa-believing child anymore (although I sometimes act like that in private

) not being able to hold out, mate.

**flopper** · 11-22-2008, 12:18 AM

Originally Posted by SAE

He could do, but he clearly stated he would not. So lets show some respect to that man following his principles. I am also totally eager to seeing results here, but I am not a santa-believing child anymore (although I sometimes act like that in private

) not being able to hold out, mate.

got to respect the manufacture also.

**NH|Delph1** · 11-22-2008, 09:19 AM

Originally Posted by AndrewZorn

Please. We are talking about "is it better than TRUE or water or not"... which he gives a vague answer to. There's not much of a process in saying "it outperformed the TRUE by 10*C"... which is what everyone is waiting to hear.

I have to respect the manufacturer here. I'm sorry, but I believe it will be for the best if all numbers are released at the same time. If I give you one number you're expectations are going to be based on this very number and color your views of the upcoming review. Besides, which number should I pick then? From the passive? the low-flow fan? the mid-flow fan? the high-flow fan? The difference will vary between test as the passive flow heatpipes and active flow metal will behave different in each test.

If you get all numbers at the same time you will get the honest chance of forming your own opinion without being colored by a number I had to choose for you.

I am sorry for the delay, even though I had nothing to with it and I can't stress it, I hope you bear with us here.

//Andreas

**cegras** · 11-22-2008, 10:28 AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaK

**Kuroimaho** · 11-22-2008, 10:55 AM

Could you let us know when will the NDA expire ?

**Cooper** · 11-22-2008, 11:13 AM

lol there's no nda

you already can buy the thing.

Andreas just dont want to spill the beans on the partial results, cos it may distort the image of the product compared to full title

**Supershanks** · 11-25-2008, 09:35 AM

Never seen a cooler genearate as much hot air before

most ppl that are thinking of throwing that kind of money on cooling will also cool their GFX cards or NB etc

and their beer

**suddeath** · 11-26-2008, 02:48 AM

Originally Posted by Andreas G

We know you're waiting for us to publish the review of the Danamics LM10. We've been working closely with Danamics over the last few weeks to make sure things would go as smoothly as possible, unfortunately that hasn't been the case. There is no single person to blame, just a combination of bad luck and a couple of unfortunate events. Danamics have resolved this though and we should receive an updated cooler tomorrow, one that will reflect the performance of the retail cooler. We will also change our update methodology a bit from our regular synthetic test bench to testing in an environment closer resembling your average PC case. This will make the testing a bit more inconvenient, but it should not slow down the review any further.

http://www.nordichardware.com/news,8407.html

Too bad, I guess we have to wait a little longer...

**Warship** · 11-26-2008, 03:02 AM

Wasn't the whole idea that it was to be fanless? No moving parts?

**Cooper** · 11-26-2008, 03:11 AM

Originally Posted by Warship

Wasn't the whole idea that it was to be fanless? No moving parts?

TRUE w/o a fan is also silent and no moving parts, but you still need to remove the heat somehow.

**Salsoolo** · 11-26-2008, 05:43 AM

for that price, it should perform same as liquid cooling.
cant wait for the review

Thread: Danamics - a revolutionary cooling system?!

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions