Quote Originally Posted by Sly Fox View Post
Wasn't really directed at you, sorry for the confusion.

No problem with disagreements, I'd hate to go to an XS where it's off-limits to argue. Just saying, some people get a bit too disrespectful and I think it's inappropriate.

XS seems to lose a legendary user a day thanks to smart-talking children that signed up a few months ago at most. And I think it's sad, I don't know how many more great users plan to leave, but I hope none.

In any case, Phenom II, good stuff, good stuff.
Ah, that's clear then

It's indeed a shame some very good members left or refuse to post in certain sections and so do I hope we wont have to lose a lot more of those people. KTE for example posted some very good stuff, but he left as well

Anyway, lets get back on-topic heh


Quote Originally Posted by Helmore View Post
My guess is, the latter option. Only problem is, I have not seen any new info on AMD's 45 nm. process node refresh for at least half a year. I'd say they are not going to do it on 45 nm. and just implement it on their future 32 nm. node.
Not sure, there were some reports a later revision of Deneb will have high/k and metal gates. Now I dont know what sort of changes there has to be made to even use this, but I think it would be quite weird to say on such relative short terms to do it and then not to do it. I mean, it's not like a a CPU you are doubting about whether to buy or not to buy it today