Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
What leakage? Are you saying that they're not comparable at 3,2GHz because Nehalem is new or something? We are not talking about 65nm AMD process here

Another round of hypocrists please...
Read the post in which i asked for 2.66 vs 2.66Ghz comparison.Other user provided the link to the same anandtech website where 920 consumes a lot more than york @ 2.66Ghz.So picking up the most problematic part from power draw level(QX9770) just to paint a nice picture about i7 power draw is lame.
I provided the Lost Circuits measurement where QX9650 draws 20% less power while working at 11% higher clock.Shintai claimed the complete opposite-a lower power draw for same clocked core i7 and c2q