IntelBurnTest - The new stress-testing program

[brinox]

Remeber that none of our rigs are 100% stable, even the memory stock will not be 100% error free.

the real question is why???!!! (hint: got neutrinos?)

[Brama]

the real question is why???!!! (hint: got neutrinos?)

Better say alpha coming from memory package and gamma from the space.

The interaction of neutrinos is near zero. This is why it is so difficult to detect them

[AgentGOD]

I personally keep Load-Line Calibration on.

[clip]

Load each core with 1 instance of orthos

[pierrandre]

WTF ???

Translation :
Analysis

This app is infected by a trojan, no way to repair it.
trojan is Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Calac.lh
into the IntelburnTest.exe

Delete
or
Ignore (keep)

Never had this before ??
is this a false positive ??
how is it possible ?

[WaterFlex]

pierrandre
It seems AgentGOD became a hacker

[Loser777]

He always was... Annihilation X4 ring a bell?

[X4er0]

WTF ???

Translation :
Analysis

This app is infected by a trojan, no way to repair it.
trojan is Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Calac.lh
into the IntelburnTest.exe

Delete
or
Ignore (keep)

Never had this before ??
is this a false positive ??
how is it possible ?

Where did you download it from?

[X4er0]

Well, guess my PC passed

[X4er0]

10 passes got my E8600 on 54 degrees celsius max instead of 48 degrees.

[AgentGOD]

Well, guess my PC passed

Congrats on your stability

Never had this before ??
is this a false positive ??
how is it possible ?

I assure you there is no malicious code in IntelBurnTest. It's either a false positive, or you downloaded a tampered one.

[andressergio]

AgentGOD congrats on this test

It'll make it's debout on my new Q9650 for the burn it phase on low volts of course

keep the good work up mate

Cheers
Sergio

[AgentGOD]

Thanks.

Anyone test it on a Core i7 system yet? :P

[max_87]

I keep getting this in WinXP 32-bit, what's wrong? It does not happen in Vista x64.

[AgentGOD]

That happened because you did not extract all the files to a single folder while keeping their directory structure intact.

[Loser777]

I'll be running this again when I get a new PSU...

[max_87]

That happened because you did not extract all the files to a single folder while keeping their directory structure intact.

All the files are extracted to a single folder and I never change the directory structure. Plus this only happens on XP 32-bit.

[AgentGOD]

All the files are extracted to a single folder and I never change the directory structure. Plus this only happens on XP 32-bit.

Really? I tested it on XP 32-bit, 64-bit, Vista 32-bit and Vista 64-bit, and all worked fine.

Try extracting to a shorter directory, like C:\IntelBurnTest, for example. Maybe you are exceeding the maximum path limit somehow.

I'll be running this again when I get a new PSU...

I thought your Corsair was running strong enough for you

Oh yeah, and I finally surpassed you in 3DMark06.

[Loser777]

Really? I tested it on XP 32-bit, 64-bit, Vista 32-bit and Vista 64-bit, and all worked fine.

Try extracting to a shorter directory, like C:\IntelBurnTest, for example. Maybe you are exceeding the maximum path limit somehow.


I thought your Corsair was running strong enough for you

Oh yeah, and I finally surpassed you in 3DMark06.

Meh, that was an old score with a bad chip :P
I'd like to see a screen because a 3.5GHz Q6600 is a pretty big bottleneck unless you clocked it higher.
When I get my new PSU it's 4GHZ time

I almost forgot why I blocked you.

[Loser777]

Well, any confirmation that this works with Nehalem?

I blocked you because you think everyone else is retarded and you judge people by "how fast their PC is". It's annoying when you say LOL YOU GOT BSOD.

[AgentGOD]

Well, any confirmation that this works with Nehalem?

Apparently not yet.

I blocked you because you think everyone else is retarded and you judge people by "how fast their PC is".

No, that was you.

It's annoying when you say LOL YOU GOT BSOD.

Well, I did convince you to get a better board, didn't I?

[Loser777]

I'd like to see how this shapes up due to Nehalem's theoretical anemic overclocking ability... those clocks for benches might end up being completely unstable for something like this.

Also, let's keep the babble contained to PMs, I don't want to derail this thread.

[AgentGOD]

You should try it on that old AMD rig of yours, just to see how it stands up to the power of IntelBurnTest

[AgentGOD]

Don't forget the eMachines too

[jcool]

Tried it on a Dual S771 rig yesterday.. linpack64 is really nice. Around 220W from the wall running prime, 250W running in 32bit mode and a whopping 280W max for the x64 with 7,55GB of used memory
Dual E5440, Supermicro X7DCA-L (insanely efficient mobo, below 100W idle drain ), 8GB Reg ECC DDR2.

Oh yeah, it also collapses my phase unit after a while if I run it on the Q6600 (the CPU is already at 260W prime...).