bah, another roundup in sea of similar test, but with 100 processors!

I want to see something different, from another perspective!

Here's a really good example:


http://en.hardspell.com/doc/showcont...42&pageid=3301


those guys have "simulated" average Joe usability scenario that includes IE opened with bunch of tabs, and Norton AV running in the background. Then they've fired up standard battery of benchmarks to see which CPU will provide better user experience!

I don't understand why more revievers don't adopt similar aproach... I mean what's good of multicore CPUs if not providing better multithreaded/multitaking usage experience?!

Imagine if those auto reviewers only would test cars by connecting engine on dinamometer, and measuring highest horsepower by taping the gas pedal?