alright chaps got me another 4 gb of mushkin 996599 rated 1066 @ 2.1V (though 2.02V is enough)
Now i have a M3N-HT deluxe with latest bios and a 6000+ F3 . problem is i cant boot into windows even at 230 cpu freq no matter what. Can someone guide me on how to overclock with so much memory?
Later on i will provide info with a phenom and 8 GB ram
thanks
E8400 E0 @ 4.00 GHZ, DFI P45 T2RS+, 4X2GB Mushkin 1066 996599, Radeon 4890 , Enermax Liberty 620W , 4X500GB HDD+Samsung SLC 64gb SSD.
all paired with a LG 245WP
lower your memory speed to ddr 800 +/- and slowly raise it till you cant boot up, then lower by 5-50 mhz still its stable in prime or occt. you have to keep in mind the more memory you have the harder it is to overclock, or even run at stock speeds for that matter (esp 1066 on that mobo)
you can leave your cpu speed @ stock until you got it figured out.
sorted , it only took disabling C&Q
12X267 cpu freq , mem @ 1.985V
phenom will love 8gb
E8400 E0 @ 4.00 GHZ, DFI P45 T2RS+, 4X2GB Mushkin 1066 996599, Radeon 4890 , Enermax Liberty 620W , 4X500GB HDD+Samsung SLC 64gb SSD.
all paired with a LG 245WP
Is the phenom able to treat 2 2x2gb sets as if they were all connected since it has a built in memory controller?
Decided to ask here because so far your the only one I've heard of to use 8gb with a phenom.
I've been using 8GB with my 9850 since spring, Caveman. It works just fine.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
i dont think i understood the questionOriginally Posted by Caveman787
i have 4X2 gb sticks of mushkin 996599 ram
E8400 E0 @ 4.00 GHZ, DFI P45 T2RS+, 4X2GB Mushkin 1066 996599, Radeon 4890 , Enermax Liberty 620W , 4X500GB HDD+Samsung SLC 64gb SSD.
all paired with a LG 245WP
lololol though you would have had that disabled a long time agosorted , it only took disabling C&Q
12X267 cpu freq , mem @ 1.985V
phenom will love 8gb
do you mean quad-channel RAM access?
no, it can't do that.
only server chipsets can do that, but even opterons can't.
BTW@ea6gka: why the f do you need 8GB? ^^ i can't think of any reason but heavy virtualization or rendering.
Last edited by enteon; 10-23-2008 at 07:47 AM.
think there is the uncontrollable urge to fill every slot in sight
4gb seems to be a good sweet spot now.
2GB Dominators D9 @ 824mhz 4-4-4-12 1.90v
EVGA nForce 680i SLI 122-CK-NF68 1.13 TB stripe (raid 0)
EVGA 8800 GTS 640mb x 2 SLI 685/1054-Q6600 C2Q @3.5ghz 1.55v
32'' Samsung LCD LN-R327W @ 1360x768
Auzen X-Meridian 7.1 24-bit-192khz HD optical DTS
Logitech Z-5450 digital/optical DTS
OCZ Game X stream 850w DD5 Pump - black ice 3 - Exos2
Danger Den - 8800GTS Water blocks x 2 - Cpu block
Logitech Mx Revolution Z-Board Crossfire
HTPC MozartTx Cube Tower
Hm...maybe video editing?
GIS applications , remote sensing etc. I deal with huge files
also i couldnt stand watching 2 slots empty
E8400 E0 @ 4.00 GHZ, DFI P45 T2RS+, 4X2GB Mushkin 1066 996599, Radeon 4890 , Enermax Liberty 620W , 4X500GB HDD+Samsung SLC 64gb SSD.
all paired with a LG 245WP
DDR2 is becoming comically cheap now. That's why I have 8Gb.
I have to work with medical image dataset and with 4GB the system usualy starts to swap after ten minutes or so.
I'd like to aska few questions. Can you run the 8GB in 533 mode? To the modules have an EPP profile for that mode and what tRC does that profile have?
i can run the modules at all speeds available by the 6000 imc , 533,667,800. oced to 1066 .
E8400 E0 @ 4.00 GHZ, DFI P45 T2RS+, 4X2GB Mushkin 1066 996599, Radeon 4890 , Enermax Liberty 620W , 4X500GB HDD+Samsung SLC 64gb SSD.
all paired with a LG 245WP
Thanks, but I meant 2x533 means 1066 stock in your terms.
oh sorry mate , i havent got my phenom right now , i will post when i do. I am having a X2 6000+ atm
(waiting for my 125w 9950)
But i assume that if the K8 imc can do 4X2GB at 1066 speeds the phenom can do it aswell. we will see
Last edited by ea6gka; 10-23-2008 at 11:36 AM.
E8400 E0 @ 4.00 GHZ, DFI P45 T2RS+, 4X2GB Mushkin 1066 996599, Radeon 4890 , Enermax Liberty 620W , 4X500GB HDD+Samsung SLC 64gb SSD.
all paired with a LG 245WP
according to amd phenom can't run 1066 in 4 slots. if you have all 4 slots of ram it automatically downclocks it to 800 mhz. im not sure if this is true because i have seen people run 8gb at 1066 while others can't.
we will see
E8400 E0 @ 4.00 GHZ, DFI P45 T2RS+, 4X2GB Mushkin 1066 996599, Radeon 4890 , Enermax Liberty 620W , 4X500GB HDD+Samsung SLC 64gb SSD.
all paired with a LG 245WP
I for one didn't need 8GB. I just needed more than 4GB (6GB would have been plenty), and there weren't a lot of real option in between. I like to leave a lot of things running and work a bit on a lot of projects simultaneously, be it a video project, photo project, programming project, or gaming. I was often hitting the ceiling back when I had 4GB.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
but you do know that multitasking actually slows you down?
i don't think i ever made it to more than 2GB + cache
and i do have a lot of cache...kind of vista-like ^^
only without ever touching the swap...btw 5GB for me
vista caches 5.7 GB out of the 8 GB. No swap enabled
E8400 E0 @ 4.00 GHZ, DFI P45 T2RS+, 4X2GB Mushkin 1066 996599, Radeon 4890 , Enermax Liberty 620W , 4X500GB HDD+Samsung SLC 64gb SSD.
all paired with a LG 245WP
wow, microsoft finally learnt it
but hell...linux is much nicer anyway
Sure having more threads isn't good for performance, but that's just the way I roll. I like leaving stuff open because I like leaving stuff open. Nuff said.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
oh yeah...i just meant mental 'performance'
the overall thinking time is higher when doing more than one thing at a time. for women, too
but your computers can do this! GIV'EM HELL !!
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/projects.php
I use my computer for recreation. My own performance and efficiency isn't very important in the grand scheme. heh I'll keep that tip for the ladies though.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks