i think 64bit vista gives lower scores? my phenom at 2.3nb/3.1cpu/860mem 4-4-4-12 gives 23000KCU/s?
i think 64bit vista gives lower scores? my phenom at 2.3nb/3.1cpu/860mem 4-4-4-12 gives 23000KCU/s?
i7 920@4.34 | Rampage II GENE | 6GB OCZ Reaper 1866 | 8800GT (zzz) | Corsair AX750 | Xonar Essence ST w/ 3x LME49720 | HiFiMAN EF2 Amplifier | Shure SRH840 | EK Supreme HF | Thermochill PA 120.3 | MCP355 | XSPC Reservoir | 3/8" ID Tubing
Phenom 9950BE @ 3400/2000 (CPU/NB) | Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H | HD4850 | 4GB Corsair DHX @850 | Corsair TX650W | T.R.U.E Push-Pull
E2160 @3.06 | ASUS P5K-Pro | BFG 8800GT | 4GB G.Skill @ 1040 | 600W Tt PP
A64 3000+ @2.87 | DFI-NF4 | 7800 GTX | Patriot 1GB DDR @610 | 550W FSP
Sorry, I just had to one up youOriginally Posted by Daveburt714
Hehe......
Just had to break 31,000 KCU's
I posted in the Bench Thread Particle started too.
It has a full SS with other specs on the run if your interested...
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
Guys the benchmark maked it way over to the tech powerup forum in the overclock & cooling section you guys should go post your score show them what Phenom can do .
I just checked out the tech powerup forum. That's funnyRelease a CPU/RAM benchmark for fun just for a few guys to play with and leaderboards start cropping up on forums I've never been to. This is neat.
Last edited by Particle; 10-12-2008 at 07:15 AM.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Grats Particle nice job on the benchmark You Are The MAN !! next thing you know your benchmark will be all over the internet forums.
way lower scores under Vista x64 for me as well
I'm averaging ~19,800KB/s at 2.65GHz/2.33GHz 1130RAM 5-5-5
On Win XP x32 I'm getting ~24,700KB/s!
Last edited by Lightman; 10-12-2008 at 07:20 AM.
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
I will try on my win XP 64 and see how it is...way lower scores under Vista x64 for me as well
I'm averaging ~19,800KB/s at 2.65GHz/2.33GHz 1130RAM 5-5-5
On Win XP x32 I'm getting ~24,700KB/s!
Edit: Win XP 64bit...I dropped 5000pts when @ 3.1ghz, going from Win XP 32.
Last edited by charged3800z24; 10-12-2008 at 07:44 AM.
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
he made the post in the "benchmarking software" section. lets use that instead of here.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=204361 link to the page
Anyone been keeping up on info popping up in the coolaler forum topic of this.
I don't know what language it's in so I can't translate it.
If you want to ask him something then see this thread -----> http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/...d.php?t=204467
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I heard only his superpi on 4.1GHz, on 4.2GHz run to windows, but not corectly superpi...
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Chinese.......maybe?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks