Running Quad prime95 full blend & Burntest level 1 together now..just to be sure
Edit: substantial V-drop now. its really feeling it.
300MB left out of 8GB.
Running Quad prime95 full blend & Burntest level 1 together now..just to be sure
Edit: substantial V-drop now. its really feeling it.
300MB left out of 8GB.
Last edited by Final8ty; 09-30-2008 at 02:30 PM.
Here's a run from my AMD machine:
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
I'm running the 64bit version on vista 64 & all my results align including the first one.Originally Posted by AgentGOD
I wonder if it could be mobo related.
Well thanks for reporting a success!
I know my new theories have no direct basis on evidence, but here goes:
1. It could be caused by a weak/unstable on-die memory controller! Remember, AMD processors are extremely sensitive to any memory controller/memory problems!
2. It could be caused by defect RAM! Remember, AMD processors are extremely sensitive to any memory controller/memory problems!
3. As you said, it could be motherboard related.
4. The binary itself is defect (I doubt it, since you ran it perfectly fine on your Phenom, and for me too on my Q6600).
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
I don't know. I run the K9A2 Plat as well, but I don't know if we're using the same BIOS revision.
--
It seems like hardware is unlikely to be a problem here since both of my 9850 machines at stock exhibit the first-off problem. I wasn't the only one, either. What are the chances that we all have the same defective hardware causing an identical issue?
Last edited by Particle; 09-30-2008 at 02:54 PM.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Remember B2 stepping and TLB-bug, anyone?
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
What, you'd more easily accept massive hardware glitching than a software issue?
Besides, if we had bad hardware we wouldn't be getting a bad first run exclusively. It would be more random and unpredictable.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
I replaced linpack64.exe with linpack32.exe to test your 32/64 bit theory. The 32-bit one passes me. The 64-bit one always fails me. While that doesn't prove the point I've been making, it might be useful general debug data.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Guess we'll have to see what Intel can do to fix the 64-bit binary.
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
Heres a run I just did, I did the 5 pass's or what ever with half my ram.
If I should try a different settings let me know...... K...... :d
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
AMD Phenom II 1090T Megahalems Rev. B 4ghz
2x4gb G.Skill Ripjaws
XFX 6950 (6970 clocks/shaders)
2x250gb WD SATA
1x1tb WD SATA
750 watt PCP&C Quad Silencer
X-Fi Titanium
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
You're a rather snarky one, aren't you? I can tell you're a programmer like myself. I get pissed off when people say my software has bugs before I even know if they're right or not. I also get ultra-defensive and fall into that all-too-easy "That's Impossible" zone.
Remember that Intel didn't implement AMD64 extensions identically to AMD. Their 64-bit version of linpack may just be incompatible. *shrug*
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Im using the performance bios that is in my Sig that has AutoXpress implemented.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=17
I'd like to see if this triggers any TLB problems with the B2s.
1.7%
Aww don't be mean.. I'm an AMD fanboy.
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
You actually entered higher memory than you have available at the time... so half the time it would have been paging to the disk. Look at the "free memory" box at the top... it tells you how much RAM you have free.
Also, try using "maximum stress" if you can. See if it's stable then. If so, you're another person who was successfully able to run 64-bit Linpack test on AMD Phenom (in this thread).
Last edited by AgentGOD; 09-30-2008 at 07:22 PM.
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
I gave the official 1.5 a shot. It seems to allow me to cold boot at stock settings finally! Woo! It used to reset itself 4-5 times and complain about bad OC settings. heh What a great mobo. Also interesting is that my performance is higher in in this app (verify off mode). ~30 GFLOPS instead of ~24 GFLOPS
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Hey, some of you guys who have ran 64-bit on a K10 without issue, can you post your CPUID and microcode codes?
Mine is an 0810 GPBW, 0100F23H/01000065H.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
~37 GFLOPS here
Used Maximum stress and passed again...
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
AMD Phenom II 1090T Megahalems Rev. B 4ghz
2x4gb G.Skill Ripjaws
XFX 6950 (6970 clocks/shaders)
2x250gb WD SATA
1x1tb WD SATA
750 watt PCP&C Quad Silencer
X-Fi Titanium
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
So NO to error detection will show you your progress as you go & give you GFLOP's. & check the align your self.
I wouldn't know what to tell you guys then... since it's working perfectly fine for some, but not for others.
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
AgentGOD: Thanks for your work on this software..
It seems to run fine on my machine, but I am running a 32bit OS (see sig).
CLICKABLE:
I haven't done enough testing yet to see if the settings are actually everyday stable, but it definetly heats things up more than 4x PrimeBlend did
and I don't have to run it for hours on end stressing every other component to check my OC...
Excellent work man! And Thanks Again....
AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case
First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).
Yeah, it's very weird. I mean, I know it's out of your control to fix--it's something odd between the 64-bit binary and (some?) K10s.
I just wish we had more to go on. I'm perfectly happy to discard the first result and just check them myself though. Thanks for the work you put into it.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Ummm wow you don't seem to be hitting the INSANE temps we do. I guess if 149 are stable then the first is bogus. For me a fail gets a large number [factor of 10 bigger than the others]
how come my G-FLOPS are higher than yours when your cpu is running 200MHZ faster & running your ram at 1066 while mine is on the 800 setting + BUS speed.AgentGOD: Thanks for your work on this software..
It seems to run fine on my machine, but I am running a 32bit OS (see sig).
CLICKABLE:
I haven't done enough testing yet to see if the settings are actually everyday stable, but it definetly heats things up more than 4x PrimeBlend did
and I don't have to run it for hours on end stressing every other component to check my OC...
Excellent work man! And Thanks Again....
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks