Retail E5200 @ 4.317GHz on air result!

[Sgt_Strider]

Up to 10%, usually around 5% IIRC.

Are you sure about this?

[xdan]

More than that ,15-20% i guess. From what i know E8400 and E5200 have the same core, 45nm, Intel virtualiztion E5200 does'nt have.
The main diference is the cache which is 6mb for E8xxx and 2mb for E5200/
Anyway this E5200 do a great concurence to E7xxx, and smash with al x2 series from Amd up to X2 6400, an even to triple core
It's seems that Intel realy wants to crush Amd

[Tonucci]

More than that ,15-20% i guess. From what i know E8400 and E5200 have the same core, 45nm, Intel virtualiztion E5200 does'nt have.
The main diference is the cache which is 6mb for E8xxx and 2mb for E5200/
Anyway this E5200 do a great concurence to E7xxx, and smash with al x2 series from Amd up to X2 6400, an even to triple core
It's seems that Intel realy wants to crush Amd

I dont think its 15-20%, I saw some tests a while ago where the e7300 was usually less than 5% slower, <10% in the worst cases, comparing with an wolfdale.

The e5200 cache is just 1Mb smaller vs e7300, so I doubt it will be near 15% slower than an wolfdale.

Not exactly the CPU's we are talking about, but here are some interesting core2duo 4Mb vs 2Mb cache numbers:

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2795&p=4

I'll try to find some concrete info

[xdan]

May be youțre right, thing is this Cpu, apperead from a mont, and even now, i can't found a serious review on net, all a i have found is some 3dmarks, and super Pi scores from forums

[Tonucci]

May be youțre right, thing is this Cpu, apperead from a mont, and even now, i can't found a serious review on net, all a i have found is some 3dmarks, and super Pi scores from forums

I think superpi benefits alot from big caches, unlike most stuff out there

[stangracin2]

at 3.75
my e5200 and 4850 get almost 14000 in 3dmark06

[Venom-Crusher]

E5200 match pair with low cost mobo GIGABYTE GA-EP43-DS3R

[Venom-Crusher]

Mad Prime @ 1.632V. by plain water