-
True and we would have to discuss some rules to make it more balanced. Just like the NFL, good analogy 
How about we have more then two teams, but each team is limited to let's say 5 players. With a growing number of fah folders that could work out to a nice number of teams. This I think will be good because you will offcourse get teams which are to much to handle for most, imagine the top 10 producers all cluttering together in two megateams!
So you limit it to five players per team, but you only allow the two of the top20 players of last season to join in each team, so each team has atleast 3 new players who haven't been producing allot. That should balance it some, you will still get stronger teams and lesser strong teams but since you get more teams they can also compete for spots with more equal teams. At the end of each season there is a time off period where players will be traded, but during a season no trades will be allowed.
I'm thinking this will be a nice idea, it kind of mimics what the ranking stats do on a smaller scale and it shares it attractive sides, competition and trying your best to do what you can ( something I'm afraid to admit though my ppd don't show... I can do much better and I promise I will but back on topic ).
Now, I do think there are some requirements for this and the most import one is that is has to be easy and intuitive to follow and to participate in, and I'm thinking we might need to go further then the current setup and try to get some people together who can set up a site for the team's graphs ect. There are I think people who would volentier space and bandwidth to host such a feature and I'm sure the team has plenty people capable of making it happen if you share the feeling I got, that this could work to drive this team onward and upward
We will be competing withing XS, but you seen what that does for ppd so that's not a valid counter argument if anyone wants to use it like that. It will not host a forum, just the stats so it won't take away from traffic and lifeliness so that's not a valid counter argument.
I'm not setting out stone rules I would love for everyone to talk and tell me what you think could and should be usefull 
Editing... brb 
Nope can't find much to edit, but I do need people to tell me I'm pretty mad at thinking it will work... or not.
Edit2:
One edit though maybe, I said another site for the graphs as it will have to be a dynamic system offcourse and that means server time. People already complain about forums being slow
Offourse it would be the nicest if the graphs could be hosted on XS itself!
Last edited by Marvin_The_Martian; 09-18-2008 at 12:39 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks