Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 226

Thread: Thermalright Unveils True Copper Ultra-120 Extreme Coolers

  1. #51
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Alberta Canada
    Posts
    631
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    The Ultima doesn't have bent 'wingtips' though.

    Also, for anyone who doesn't get it yet: Copper is simply better than aluminum for heatsink applications. The problem is that marketing has brainwashed you - the only reason why aluminum is used is because it's cheaper and copper is really not worth the small performance increase.
    you cant forget that aluminum is also much lighter, the other main reason why companies use aluminum
    Current System:
    eVGA 680i SLi "A2" P30 BIOS
    intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (currently at stock)
    OCZ ReaperX 4GB DDR2 1000 (running at DDR2 800 Speeds with cas4)
    320GB Seagate 7200.10
    XFX 8800GT XXX 512MB (stock clocks)
    auzentech X-Fi Prelude
    PC Power and Cooling Silencer 750 Quad Copper
    Win XP Pro

  2. #52
    Nerdy Powerlifter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Down in the Bayou
    Posts
    4,553
    I want to see it weighed. 3kg? pssh, no. Whats the difference? Copper fins? that's not 2/3 of the mass of the heatsink. Did they add extra copper just to get to this weight? I would not a trust a mobo to hold up 6.6 lbs + the weigh of a fan on the cpu. There would be more contact on the lower half of the cpu just due to the weight shift unless you had some industrial quality brace.

    Its pretty and will probably do a very good job of cooling and looking pretty, but unless my mobo is horizontal, forget it.
    You must [not] advance.


    Current Rig: i7 4790k @ stock (**** TIM!) , Zotac GTX 1080 WC'd 2214mhz core / 5528mhz Mem, Asus z-97 Deluxe

    Heatware

  3. #53
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    so so awesome...im getting one

  4. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoonXX View Post
    you cant forget that aluminum is also much lighter, the other main reason why companies use aluminum
    the main reason they use aluminum is cause steel is cheaper and they cant profit as much from it. Whatever gets them more $$$ for no intelligent reason is their motto...

    ps. im not being a hypocrite for wanting the TRUE copper...yes it's expensive and "flashy" but I coulda gone for the Ninja copper if i was a drone. The reason I'm 99% getting one is because the performance you will get from it with a nice push/pull setup using high powered fans should be amazing. Remember, since copper's thermal conductivity is much MUCH higher than aluminum's, you need really good fans + air flow in your case to cool this baby down and get rid of all the heat it stores.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    you need really good fans + air flow in your case to cool this baby down and get rid of all the heat it stores.
    That's crazy talk. The EXACT same amount of heat that was produced when you were using an aluminum heatsink will still be produced, not more, not less. Assuming you're using the same CPU at the same voltage/clock. The only thing that's changing now is that your conductive surface conducts heat much much faster. In both cases(Al/Cu), the limiting factor for heat transfer is the convective heat transfer resistance, since heat transfer to the air is dependent on the convective heat transfer coefficient, which is directly related to the velocity of the air over the surface you are cooling. So, in either situation, high speed fans will help. You wont need higher speed fans just because it's all copper.

  6. #56
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by ryboto View Post
    That's crazy talk. The EXACT same amount of heat that was produced when you were using an aluminum heatsink will still be produced, not more, not less. Assuming you're using the same CPU at the same voltage/clock. The only thing that's changing now is that your conductive surface conducts heat much much faster. In both cases(Al/Cu), the limiting factor for heat transfer is the convective heat transfer resistance, since heat transfer to the air is dependent on the convective heat transfer coefficient, which is directly related to the velocity of the air over the surface you are cooling. So, in either situation, high speed fans will help. You wont need higher speed fans just because it's all copper.
    Buddy, copper has the 3rd highest thermal conductivity on Earth, behind diamond and silver. That means that whatever heat was transferred to the aluminum was dependent on the aluminum's ability to conduct heat energy. Now, since copper's conductivity is HIGHER, much MUCH higher (401 vs 237 W/(m·K)). That means that at any given time, it will be transferring and thus storing more heat energy than the aluminum version. Soooo that means that in order for the heatsink to not become overpowered by its own thermal conductivity, it needs to GET RID of the heat it conducts at a faster pace as well. Hence, the reason for more powerful fans.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    Buddy, copper has the 3rd highest thermal conductivity on Earth, behind diamond and silver. That means that whatever heat was transferred to the aluminum was dependent on the aluminum's ability to conduct heat energy. Now, since copper's conductivity is HIGHER, much MUCH higher (401 vs 237 W/(m·K)). That means that at any given time, it will be transferring and thus storing more heat energy than the aluminum version. Soooo that means that in order for the heatsink to not become overpowered by its own thermal conductivity, it needs to GET RID of the heat it conducts at a faster pace as well. Hence, the reason for more powerful fans.
    Take a heat transfer course and what I was saying might make more sense to you. The rate of heat transfer to the air is dependent on two things, a thermal gradient and the convective heat transfer coefficient. The thermal gradient is dependent on the temperature of the surface, and bulk air temperature. Now, the rate of heat transfer directly increases with increasing temperature delta, Q = h A (T-Ta). The hotter surface aids in cooling already. With the same heat source, same convection type(forced/unforced), copper will cool the surface better.

  8. #58
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    That is purely theoretical. You forget that the heat transfer that occurs between the CPU and the copper heatsink is greater than that of the heatsink and the air. Although copper's heat capacity is a lot bigger than aluminum's, eventually, if the fans aren't getting rid of the heat at a greater rate than the heatsink is absorbing it, then the copper will start getting hotter and hotter and become useless.

    Think of it like this:

    1st hour: a lot of heat transferred to heatsink, not so much going out of the case
    2nd hour: ambient case temps start increasing, copper heatsink starts struggling trying to stay cool
    3rd hour: high ambient case temp has overpowered the heatsink, heatsink is now useless

    That's why just looking at thermal conductivity doesn't tell the whole story. In a lab, yeah it does, but in real life it does not.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    That is purely theoretical. You forget that the heat transfer that occurs between the CPU and the copper heatsink is greater than that of the heatsink and the air. Although copper's heat capacity is a lot bigger than aluminum's, eventually, if the fans aren't getting rid of the heat at a greater rate than the heatsink is absorbing it, then the copper will start getting hotter and hotter and become useless.

    Think of it like this:

    1st hour: a lot of heat transferred to heatsink, not so much going out of the case
    2nd hour: ambient case temps start increasing, copper heatsink starts struggling trying to stay cool
    3rd hour: high ambient case temp has overpowered the heatsink, heatsink is now useless

    That's why just looking at thermal conductivity doesn't tell the whole story. In a lab, yeah it does, but in real life it does not.
    No, it wont become hotter and hotter, it will, like any heat exhanger, reach a steady state temperature given a consistent heat load. What you're proposing should happen to ANY heatsink. I'm not just looking at the thermal conductivity, I'm considering the convective conductivity which will increase. If a lab simulates "real life", how is it not accurate? Just stop misinforming people. A Copper heatsink does not need higher airflow than an aluminum one. If your logic even was applicable, then this would be true for aluminum heatsinks as well.

  10. #60
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by ryboto View Post
    No, it wont become hotter and hotter, it will, like any heat exhanger, reach a steady state temperature given a consistent heat load. What you're proposing should happen to ANY heatsink. I'm not just looking at the thermal conductivity, I'm considering the convective conductivity which will increase. If a lab simulates "real life", how is it not accurate? Just stop misinforming people. A Copper heatsink does not need higher airflow than an aluminum one. If your logic even was applicable, then this would be true for aluminum heatsinks as well.
    An aluminum heatsink doesn't conduct as much, so its fans can remove the heat from the case without becoming overburdened. So this gradual temperature increase would take a lot longer. On a copper heatsink like the TRUE, which is designed extremely well, this gradual increase in temperature would take a lot less time, and while for the first hour or so, it would cool rather well, the ambient temp would start to "choke", and things would go down hill from there.

    You CANNOT expect a copper heatsink to cool well if you aren't removing that excess heat from the case. That's all I'm saying.

    And for ^^^ to happen, you need better cooling. If you already have good cooling, this is obviously not an issue. Just don't waste money on a $100 heatsink only to slap on some weak ass 800rpm "silent" fans on it.
    Last edited by Baron_Davis; 09-17-2008 at 09:03 AM.

  11. #61
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    An aluminum heatsink doesn't conduct as much, so its fans can remove the heat from the case without becoming overburdened. So this gradual temperature increase would take a lot longer. On a copper heatsink like the TRUE, which is designed extremely well, this gradual increase in temperature would take a lot less time, and while for the first hour or so, it would cool rather well, the ambient temp would start to "choke", and things would go down hill from there.

    You CANNOT expect a copper heatsink to cool well if you aren't removing that excess heat from the case. That's all I'm saying.

    And for ^^^ to happen, you need better cooling. If you already have good cooling, this is obviously not an issue. Just don't waste money on a $100 heatsink only to slap on some weak ass 800rpm "silent" fans on it.
    Theres no "EXCESS HEAT"! it's the same heat source...Copper doesn't generate heat you know...it just conducts it faster, REMOVING heat faster under the same conditions. A copper heastink with an 800rpm fan will perform better than an aluminum heatsink with the same fan. It might be a marginal improvement, but it will conduct heat faster. If an aluminum heatsink doesn't conduct as much heat, its fins would be cooler than a copper version, and in that sense, you're going to have a hotter CPU.

    Why will the ambient temp "Choke"? any decent fans are basically removing the entire case volume of air every minute, so the ambient air is going to be close to ambient room temp, and on top of that, you'll reach a steady state. Things aren't going to generate more heat because you change your material of conduction.

  12. #62
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    steelcity.pa.usa
    Posts
    3,522
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32 View Post
    the difference was a few months ago when asked about this at computex, thermalright stated there would be no copper edition as it was too heavy on the motherboards to be practical for production, and it raised saftey concerns.


    Edit: yes it does look like a ultima 90 copper edition judging by the width
    ultima 90? why? because the picture is at an angle?
    it looks the same as the true on their site
    http://www.thermalright.com/new_a_pa...rue-main-1.jpg
    STARSCREAM
    3570k @ 4.6 GHz | Asus P8Z77-V LK | G.Skill F3-12800CL8D-8GBXM | ASUS GeForce GTX550 Ti
    Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB | Corsair Force GT 120GB | SK hynix 128GB | Samsung 830 64GB
    WD Black 640GB (3) | Seagate 7200rpm 1TB | Dell Perc H310 xflashed to LSI 9211-8i
    Corsair AX750 | CoolerMaster Hyper 212 | Antec P280 | Dell Ultrasharp U2410 | BenQ XL2420T
    ROCCAT Savu | Filco Majestouch-2 TKL w/Cherry MX Reds
    MEGATRON
    3770k @ 4.5GHz | Asus Sabertooth Z77 | G.Skill F3-12800CL8D-8GBXM
    SK hynix 128GB | Mushkin Enhanced Chronos 60GB | WD Red 3TB (4) | Seagate 7200rpm 3TB (2)
    WD Green 2TB (3) | Seagate 7200rpm 1TB | Dell Perc H310 xflashed to LSI 9211-8i (2)
    Corsair AX650 | Corsair H80i

  13. #63
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    woah sweet... 3kg of copper is kinda cheap for $99 ?
    ---

  14. #64
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Source? They aren't releasing it.

  15. #65
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,821
    Nice. I will keep my eye on this, but I already have a Sunbeam Core Contact.
    Desktop:
    Antec 300
    Foxcon A7AD-S 790GX
    8GB Gskill PC-1066@5/5/5/12
    PII X940 BE @3.6GHZ
    Sunbeam Core Contact
    2x 640GB in Raid 0+1
    4870 512MB@800/1000
    Vista Business 64bit W/ SP1

  16. #66
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by ryboto View Post
    Theres no "EXCESS HEAT"! it's the same heat source...Copper doesn't generate heat you know...it just conducts it faster, REMOVING heat faster under the same conditions. A copper heastink with an 800rpm fan will perform better than an aluminum heatsink with the same fan. It might be a marginal improvement, but it will conduct heat faster. If an aluminum heatsink doesn't conduct as much heat, its fins would be cooler than a copper version, and in that sense, you're going to have a hotter CPU.

    Why will the ambient temp "Choke"? any decent fans are basically removing the entire case volume of air every minute, so the ambient air is going to be close to ambient room temp, and on top of that, you'll reach a steady state. Things aren't going to generate more heat because you change your material of conduction.
    First off, yeah a copper heatsink will be removing more heat but at the cost of ambient temperature rising IF YOU DON'T HAVE GOOD AIR FLOW.

    Second, if you don't have intelligent placement of good fans, your ambient temp will indeed choke. Getting good air flow in most case is very hard, and I think you're being pretty idealistic in thinking that a case worth of air is getting moved every minute. Grills kill air flow. Poor case design does the same, and most cases (even $300 ones) don't have close to the perfect air flow you seem to think exists. Again, consumer PC's are not a lab. We don't live in a vacuum, figuratively speaking. I think you're applying absolute scientific laws in a chaotic environment without thinking outside the box and realizing that there are a few important factors that kill this naive thinking.

  17. #67
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    First off, yeah a copper heatsink will be removing more heat but at the cost of ambient temperature rising IF YOU DON'T HAVE GOOD AIR FLOW.
    Those scientific laws apply to the real world. Case air flow has NOTHING to do with the fact that a copper heat sink will perform better than an aluminum heat sink. Here's the skinny. An aluminum heatsink transfers heat slowly, so, compared to a copper version, it's bulk temperature is lower. To compensate, and increase heat transfer from the aluminum version, you can only increase the airflow, to increase the convective heat transfer. Because copper is warmer(due to greater heat capacity and conductivity), the temperature gradient for convective heat transfer is higher, so heat transfer to the air is greater.

    Given the same airflow, the copper heatsink will outperform the aluminum. If you put the two versions in the same system, the copper will provide better cooling. This might be marginal though, considering the heatpipes on most coolers are nickel plated copper, so the only new copper here is the fins.


    Either way you look at it, you're going to have to deal with the same amount of heat if your system isn't changing. You use an Aluminum heatsink, the rate of heat transfer is lower, so the rate that you heat the ambient case air is lower, but your CPU is hotter. Use a copper heatsink, rate of heat transfer to the air is higher, ambient might rise, but CPU temperature decreases.
    Last edited by ryboto; 09-17-2008 at 10:21 AM.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Europe/Slovenia/Ljubljana
    Posts
    1,540
    Lets wait for coolers made out of diamond. 2 to 4 times the copper thermal conductivity. Don't ask about price... :P
    Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
    Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))

  19. #69
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by RejZoR View Post
    Lets wait for coolers made out of diamond. 2 to 4 times the copper thermal conductivity. Don't ask about price... :P
    just make a diamond microprocessor, thermal limits on that would mean we probably wouldn't need a heatsink.

  20. #70
    Worlds Fastest F5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Room 101, Ministry of Truth
    Posts
    1,615
    I'm going to buy 10 and then sell it back when Copper reaches $999/kg
    X5670 B1 @175x24=4.2GHz @1.24v LLC on
    Rampage III Extreme Bios 0003
    G.skill Eco @1600 (7-7-7-20 1T) @1.4v
    EVGA GTX 580 1.5GB
    Auzen X-FI Prelude
    Seasonic X-650 PSU
    Intel X25-E SLC RAID 0
    Samsung F3 1TB
    Corsair H70 with dual 1600 rpm fan
    Corsair 800D
    3008WFP A00



  21. #71
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    172
    it could happen they could use synthetic Diamonds but your right the price would be unbearable
    Last edited by @@@@; 09-17-2008 at 11:31 AM.
    In progress......

  22. #72
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Europe/Slovenia/Ljubljana
    Posts
    1,540
    Synthetic of course. Getting natural diamond of that size (or even 1/4 of it) is pretty much impossible.
    Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
    Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))

  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    390
    Hell... I'll buy one just cause it's so shiny. I won't even use it. Just keep it in a acrylic box and have a small 5 watt bulb inside to make it GLOW

  24. #74
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Quote Originally Posted by PrometheusCon View Post
    Hell... I'll buy one just cause it's so shiny. I won't even use it. Just keep it in a acrylic box and have a small 5 watt bulb inside to make it GLOW
    lol I still can't get over the fact that it's 3kg...imagine dropping it on your mobo...you'd prolly take half of it out in one blow.

  25. #75
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    stock True nickel plated says it weights 790G grams

    there is no way copper would make this weigh 3KG

    only a Stainless steel one would weigh that much.

    I'm betting this would be about 1,000-1500 grams Max.

    I like that that carbon idea instead of silicon.

    why isn't anyone using it to make dies because of it's meltting point of

    The melting point of graphite is 3550ºC (6332ºF)

    The melting point of Silicon is 1410ºC
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •