Results 1 to 25 of 60

Thread: AMD's Answer to Intel Atom or AMD UVC

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    I think you got confused somewhere in the TDP numbers man..AMD rates its desktop chips as maximum TDP,unlike intel(not to say that 45nm 65W consumes 65W though,it is just for cooling reference).Next time more facts,less imagination,please
    Ehm...no. And its been proven wrong over and over again. So many times its not even funny.

    Quote Originally Posted by v_rr View Post
    ATOM spend less energy.

    But with AMD you can make a laptop with strong performance, low price, and good batery. Not so good as Atom, but AMD platform is better in other ways.
    In the end both are diferent and both have their strenghs.

    We can only hope that more builders bring this toy from AMD.
    Then you are up in some Celeron M range. They should have stayed in the first rumoured 8W range.
    Last edited by Shintai; 09-11-2008 at 12:11 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •