Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 152

Thread: 140k 3dmark 2003 air cooling

  1. #51
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    499
    have you tried the 8.8 drivers ? they make a big difference

  2. #52
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    www.vmodtech.com,Thailand
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by Olly_K View Post
    have you tried the 8.8 drivers ? they make a big difference
    I have tried 8.8beta & 8.8final finished already,

    it is stilling get into trouble, although run at the speed all originally default,

  3. #53
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    499
    i would push your e8600 to 4.8 if you can....

  4. #54
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    italy
    Posts
    171
    update singol card!!
    ddr3 up
    vga up
    tomorrow i try the c.f for the 145k

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    italy
    Posts
    171
    cpu liquid cooling!!
    tomorrow i try 900/960 liquid cooling!!

  6. #56
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    463
    5 GHZ ON WATER
    dear god this thing is a beast
    amd 720
    M4A78T-E
    i gig of crap
    visionek 4850
    seagate 320 GB 7200.10
    WD 640 GB
    swiftech MCR320 swiftech MCP355
    Apogee GTZ
    XPSC Restop


    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    I can say one thing I learned out of all this, I am not buying any Intel SSDs thats for sure...

  7. #57
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cruz Alta - CBA - Argentina
    Posts
    617
    1 question :p which is the batch of that CPU? i didn't read that in other page of this thread :s
    iMac 24''
    BNDMOD @
    Cruz Alta (Cba.) Argentina

  8. #58
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    italy
    Posts
    171
    q822a435

  9. #59
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    88
    Woa! Nice Scores! You should try LN2 for best Scores!

  10. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Stadtallendorf (Germany)
    Posts
    18
    Sorry man, but your Scores are not with CPU on air or water. I have seen your Compare @hwbot, your CPU must be on LN2, because it ist not on 8x 6xxx, its on 10x 6xx.
    Look guys here is the Compare: http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=10

  11. #61
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    706
    no on the orb if you lower the multiplier from default which is 10x on e8600 to say 8 like spl it still times the fsb by the default multiplier which shows 6ghz instead of 600fsb by 8, 4.8 ghz that its actually running at same on everybodys its just a bug of the orb





  12. #62
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by Kovsk View Post
    Sorry man, but your Scores are not with CPU on air or water. I have seen your Compare @hwbot, your CPU must be on LN2, because it ist not on 8x 6xxx, its on 10x 6xx.
    Look guys here is the Compare: http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=10
    Orb bug ...

    Using LN2, with his VGA clocks, 150k are past When 4870X2s go on LN2, scores will be >> 155k

  13. #63
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    463
    Quote Originally Posted by George_o/c View Post
    Orb bug ...
    theres alot of those lol
    amd 720
    M4A78T-E
    i gig of crap
    visionek 4850
    seagate 320 GB 7200.10
    WD 640 GB
    swiftech MCR320 swiftech MCP355
    Apogee GTZ
    XPSC Restop


    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    I can say one thing I learned out of all this, I am not buying any Intel SSDs thats for sure...

  14. #64
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cruz Alta - CBA - Argentina
    Posts
    617
    Quote Originally Posted by spl View Post
    q822a435
    Dam... jejeje i want one of that :p difficult to find orr just new batch?
    iMac 24''
    BNDMOD @
    Cruz Alta (Cba.) Argentina

  15. #65
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    spl, can you explain why others are needing over 6 GHz to have a prayer to match your scores??

  16. #66
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    498
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam View Post
    spl, can you explain why others are needing over 6 GHz to have a prayer to match your scores??
    3d03 is bugged...I'm sure that spl score is right...The others have low score...but first place on hwbot is strange...
    I have tested many and many time 3d03...bug

  17. #67
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    I know...but his GT2's are still untouchable. At 600x8, I get "only" 1170 fps.

    And surely there's some trick to dodge this bugginess, no?

    Clearly Kinc and spl have figured something out that none of the rest of us have.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    706
    yes it seems a low cpu clock for the score but all the test scores add up so it seems right imho, most of the bugged scores have a normal wings of fury fps for the cpu speed ,a proxycon and trolls lair thats too fast for the cpu speed and a low nature score for the cpu speed, there is a couple on hwbot top twenty which have the giveaway low nature score for 130k nature should be 970fps upwards





  19. #69
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    My scores-

    4.5GHz



    4.8 GHz



    05 at 4.8GHz looks okay...


  20. #70
    ¿
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,772
    I don't think it's bugged, there's something else going on here. Could be board related, all cores not running the same speed, AI...we'll figure it out if we keep digging.

  21. #71
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Just for the record, you guys all bench with a desktop resolution of 1024x768, right?
    Last edited by massman; 08-28-2008 at 11:58 PM.
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  22. #72
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786
    A magician never gives away his secrets, no

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    498
    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    Just for the record, you guys all bench with a desktop resolution of 1024x768, right?

    Right
    A different resolution don't give 10k + or-

  24. #74
    ¿
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,772
    Could it be so simple, LOL post #74

  25. #75
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Unfortunately no
    You are as good as your samples are!

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •