.... you, know I am pretty certain Anandtech will do a comparative article on this very point to validate this claim... if not, I will spend the money to do it myself
... personally, I think it would hurt more than help ... adding another node in the bus adds latency, which is the real killer in the current ecosystem.
Frankly, I see all of nVidia's behavior as means to benefit only nVidia -- makes sense, a company is out to make money.
One hundred years from now It won't matter
What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
-- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft
links? Proof? What you're claiming is highly slanderous and would be highly illegal for NVIDIA to do. Don't you think AMD would've called them out on it if it had been the case? Don't you think Intel would've rejected it outright from their product?
There are a whole lot of logical tests you're failing right now.
I think this is nvidia big bang II!
Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted
asus L1N64-ws or /b depending on bios chip
4x1gig 8500 gkill bpk
2x opteron 8224 @ 3.8ghz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=236
vga= 8800gt
winxp pro
custom chiller -31 water
2x dtek fuzions
bix3-with x3panaflo hi output
antec 850 quattro
heat under msimax abitmax and dfimax
Excellent news!
No tri or quad sli support without the chip though and it only works with PCI-E 2.0+ boards...
Hmmm..... this sli enabling miracle will be actually enabled through a CUSTOM BIOS
I sense a *lot* of happy ppl in the near future
More detail at Custom PC![]()
Last edited by Biker; 08-28-2008 at 04:11 AM.
X5670 B1 @175x24=4.2GHz @1.24v LLC on
Rampage III Extreme Bios 0003
G.skill Eco @1600 (7-7-7-20 1T) @1.4v
EVGA GTX 580 1.5GB
Auzen X-FI Prelude
Seasonic X-650 PSU
Intel X25-E SLC RAID 0
Samsung F3 1TB
Corsair H70 with dual 1600 rpm fan
Corsair 800D
3008WFP A00
Now it really makes sense, i've been a long time believer that dual card SLI DOESN'T need any bridge chip, IF the PCIE lanes are enough in the original chipset itself -unlike nVidia which split PCIE lanes beetween northbridge and soutbridge, Intel 975X and X38/48 generation, as well as incoming X58, are fully capable of delivering 32x PCIE lanes 2.0. Now, if we talk about Tri SLI and the bridge beetween PCIE 1.0 compliant chipset with PCIE 2.0 VGA cards for best performance in nVidia platform, that's another subject to discuss.
Intel C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz // Asus Maximus Formula x38 @ FSB 500Mhz// G.Skill Pi 2x2GB 1000Mhz // 9800GTX+ SSC eVGA // WD Raptor X 150GB + Samsung Spinpoint 2TB // DVD-RW DL Asus // Powercooler 850W // CM Cosmos S // Samsung T260N / Edifier R251 // Logitech G9 // Logitech G15 Rev2
Cooling System: Swiftech Apex Ultra H2O Kit + MCW60
In my opinion, this has been the only interesting news to come out of nvision. Finally, something worthy to cheer about!
- Gigabyte P67-UD4 | 2500K @ 4.8GHz 1.4v | 8GB G.Skill Eco 1600MHz CL7 1.35v|
- 4870X2 @ 800MHz/1000MHz | Corsair HX620W | Antec P180 | ~14TB Storage | 2 x Intel 80GB G2 in Raid 0 |
- Canon EOS 350D | Canon EF-S 18-55mm+Canon EF 55-200mm | Apple iPhone 3G 16GB |
Fantastic news, that's great progress made but I'm still not very happy with nvidia about the licensing.
I have a feeling we might see custom bios' for other boards though......
Workstation:
3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
Destop Audio:
Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
Man Cave:
PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
Gaming on the go:
Alienware M18x
i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
2*6990 | WLED 1080P
2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU
2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
![]()
Intel C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz // Asus Maximus Formula x38 @ FSB 500Mhz// G.Skill Pi 2x2GB 1000Mhz // 9800GTX+ SSC eVGA // WD Raptor X 150GB + Samsung Spinpoint 2TB // DVD-RW DL Asus // Powercooler 850W // CM Cosmos S // Samsung T260N / Edifier R251 // Logitech G9 // Logitech G15 Rev2
Cooling System: Swiftech Apex Ultra H2O Kit + MCW60
kindof funny, i always thought it was loopy of nvidia to disallow sli on any chipset at allOnce a board is certified, Nvidia will provide the board maker with an approval key (called a "cookie") that it must embed in the system BIOS. The combination of this approval key and an X58 chipset will then unlock SLI support in Nvidia's ForceWare driver software. Nvidia acknowledged to us up front that users would more than likely hack the BIOSes of non-certified X58 boards and add "cookies" to them, but said it won't get in the way of such things.
user: "i have a p35 chipset motherboard and a 8800 GT and i'd like to buy another nvidia gfx card to use in sli"
nvidia: "no!"
user: "no, you don't understand. if you'll allow SLI on p35 i'll buy another one of your graphics cards to put in my computer"
nvidia: "no!"
user: "no no, i mean like, i'll buy another nvidia gfx card, and you'll make money off the sale of that extra gfx card"
nvidia: "no!"
user: "....mmk" /buys a 4850
Workstation:
3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
Destop Audio:
Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
Man Cave:
PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
Gaming on the go:
Alienware M18x
i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
2*6990 | WLED 1080P
2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU
2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP
@ hollo: great post![]()
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I'm not an expert, but there is no technological reason why they couldn't enable it. My understanding is that SLI could be enabled through drivers on any platform
The reason stems from a business standpoint. If they stand to increase revenue through BIOS licensing/board certification + nF200 sales on x58, there is no way they are going to enable it on x38 and x48 "for free"
We as consumers are still going to pay "Nvidia Tax". Even those that don't want it will probably have to pay extra$ for the board certification. Since the board certification is only a BIOS modification, not a hardware chip, it is unlikely mobo manufacturers will make several SKU's around "certified" vs "uncertified" - forcing everyone to pay extra - as the Mobo manufacturers will just pass along the any additional costs.
both Xfire and SLI support on the same mobo??![]()
--two awesome rigs, wildly customized with
5.1 Sony speakers, Stereo 3D, UV Tourmaline Confexia, Flame Bl00dr4g3 Fatal1ty
--SONY GDM-FW900 24" widescreen CRT, overclocked to:
2560x1600 resolution at 68Hz!(from 2304x1440@80Hz)![]()
Updated List of Video Card GPU Voodoopower Ratings!!!!!
I'm not paying anything to Nvidia for a "feature" that I'll never use, if I ever go X58 I'll make sure to get a board that doesn't support these blackmail tactics, we pay enough for those damn graphics cards. "Certification fee", how stupid is that? This is a loud and clear statement from Nvidia that they don't want my money any longer, I take the hint.
Obsolescence be thy name
so now we have it officially: NVIDIA lost to Intel on this game of smartassing! They didn't get licence for QPI for their own chipset, then mobo manufacturers told them to stuff NV200 where Sun don't shine, and finally they simply gave up and are trying to do any damage recovery in a fear that enthusiastic market will go only with x58+ATI CFX combo... this is end of the line for any NVIDIA ambitions for part of chipset market on Intel platform in the future!
Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
Bookmarks