Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 90

Thread: SLI on X58 without nF200 Chip

  1. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    They'll probably sell it at a $20-30 markup to the OEMs, which will probably put it only in the top SKUs, costing another lovely $50.

    At least it doesn't use more power or cripple Radeons now. Sheesh.
    It couldn't have crippled the Radeons, but I suppose people love to assume that any black box is an evil black box...

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Sr7 View Post
    It couldn't have crippled the Radeons, but I suppose people love to assume that any black box is an evil black box...
    Why don't you explain the Skulltrail Driverheaven QCFX vs 3SLI review and the Techreport benchmark numbers?
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  3. #28
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Sr7 View Post
    To clarify.. obviously the nf chip still has a purpose.. it gives maximum throughput to the sli configuration and facilitates communication. So I'm thinking maybe we'll see some performance differences between an NF chip setup and a non NF chip setup. If it legitimately affects SLIs performance it makes sense why they've wanted to keep it limited to the chip based SLI... to show the products in the best possible light and control the SLI ecosystem better.
    .... you, know I am pretty certain Anandtech will do a comparative article on this very point to validate this claim... if not, I will spend the money to do it myself ... personally, I think it would hurt more than help ... adding another node in the bus adds latency, which is the real killer in the current ecosystem.

    Frankly, I see all of nVidia's behavior as means to benefit only nVidia -- makes sense, a company is out to make money.
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

  4. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    Why don't you explain the Skulltrail Driverheaven QCFX vs 3SLI review and the Techreport benchmark numbers?
    links? Proof? What you're claiming is highly slanderous and would be highly illegal for NVIDIA to do. Don't you think AMD would've called them out on it if it had been the case? Don't you think Intel would've rejected it outright from their product?

    There are a whole lot of logical tests you're failing right now.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,374
    I think this is nvidia big bang II!

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,943
    Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted

    asus L1N64-ws or /b depending on bios chip
    4x1gig 8500 gkill bpk
    2x opteron 8224 @ 3.8ghz
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=236
    vga= 8800gt
    winxp pro

    custom chiller -31 water
    2x dtek fuzions
    bix3-with x3panaflo hi output
    antec 850 quattro

    heat under msimax abitmax and dfimax

  7. #32
    Worlds Fastest F5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Room 101, Ministry of Truth
    Posts
    1,615
    Excellent news!

    No tri or quad sli support without the chip though and it only works with PCI-E 2.0+ boards...

    Hmmm..... this sli enabling miracle will be actually enabled through a CUSTOM BIOS

    I sense a *lot* of happy ppl in the near future

    More detail at Custom PC
    Last edited by Biker; 08-28-2008 at 04:11 AM.
    X5670 B1 @175x24=4.2GHz @1.24v LLC on
    Rampage III Extreme Bios 0003
    G.skill Eco @1600 (7-7-7-20 1T) @1.4v
    EVGA GTX 580 1.5GB
    Auzen X-FI Prelude
    Seasonic X-650 PSU
    Intel X25-E SLC RAID 0
    Samsung F3 1TB
    Corsair H70 with dual 1600 rpm fan
    Corsair 800D
    3008WFP A00



  8. #33
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    924
    Now it really makes sense, i've been a long time believer that dual card SLI DOESN'T need any bridge chip, IF the PCIE lanes are enough in the original chipset itself -unlike nVidia which split PCIE lanes beetween northbridge and soutbridge, Intel 975X and X38/48 generation, as well as incoming X58, are fully capable of delivering 32x PCIE lanes 2.0. Now, if we talk about Tri SLI and the bridge beetween PCIE 1.0 compliant chipset with PCIE 2.0 VGA cards for best performance in nVidia platform, that's another subject to discuss.

  9. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    So because 3 GT200 gpus get better scaling than 4 ATI GPUs, NVIDIA must've rigged the skulltrail NF200?

  10. #35
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buenos Aires - Argentina
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by zsamz_ View Post
    nice maybe now we can have sli on x48 n p45with some help from coders
    hope you right That will be very cool
    Intel C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz // Asus Maximus Formula x38 @ FSB 500Mhz// G.Skill Pi 2x2GB 1000Mhz // 9800GTX+ SSC eVGA // WD Raptor X 150GB + Samsung Spinpoint 2TB // DVD-RW DL Asus // Powercooler 850W // CM Cosmos S // Samsung T260N / Edifier R251 // Logitech G9 // Logitech G15 Rev2

    Cooling System: Swiftech Apex Ultra H2O Kit + MCW60

  11. #36
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    wouldnt be surprised if they did something in the driver though tbh
    Flash in a BIOS that makes the driver think there's an NF200 chip there.

    Oh well, I'm not interested in multiGPU anyways unless it comes with a Hydra chip perched on top but maybe it's nice for some folks.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    287
    In my opinion, this has been the only interesting news to come out of nvision. Finally, something worthy to cheer about!

  13. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by Blacky View Post
    I think this is nvidia big bang II!
    This may be a part of it, but the main "boom" is a new driver, ForceWare 180-series.
    - Gigabyte P67-UD4 | 2500K @ 4.8GHz 1.4v | 8GB G.Skill Eco 1600MHz CL7 1.35v|
    - 4870X2 @ 800MHz/1000MHz | Corsair HX620W | Antec P180 | ~14TB Storage | 2 x Intel 80GB G2 in Raid 0 |

    - Canon EOS 350D | Canon EF-S 18-55mm+Canon EF 55-200mm | Apple iPhone 3G 16GB |

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,696
    Fantastic news, that's great progress made but I'm still not very happy with nvidia about the licensing.

    I have a feeling we might see custom bios' for other boards though......
    Workstation:
    3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
    4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
    Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
    Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
    Destop Audio:
    Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
    Man Cave:
    PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
    Gaming on the go:
    Alienware M18x
    i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
    2*6990 | WLED 1080P
    2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
    BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU

    2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP

  15. #40
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by MomijiTMO View Post
    Well if it's just 50 bucks I think almost everyone would pay it [not me though]. However if nVidia get greedy and whack on say 100 then they suck and not everyone would jump on.
    Man I think almost everyone would not pay for it . They want SLI, but they don't want to pay a premium to use it. Add that to the already overpriced X58 mobos at launch and we'll break the $500 barrier.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buenos Aires - Argentina
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by Sagart View Post
    This may be a part of it, but the main "boom" is a new driver, ForceWare 180-series.
    imagine the forceware 180-series eneable the SLI support on x38/x48 motherboards !!
    Intel C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz // Asus Maximus Formula x38 @ FSB 500Mhz// G.Skill Pi 2x2GB 1000Mhz // 9800GTX+ SSC eVGA // WD Raptor X 150GB + Samsung Spinpoint 2TB // DVD-RW DL Asus // Powercooler 850W // CM Cosmos S // Samsung T260N / Edifier R251 // Logitech G9 // Logitech G15 Rev2

    Cooling System: Swiftech Apex Ultra H2O Kit + MCW60

  17. #42
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    617
    Once a board is certified, Nvidia will provide the board maker with an approval key (called a "cookie") that it must embed in the system BIOS. The combination of this approval key and an X58 chipset will then unlock SLI support in Nvidia's ForceWare driver software. Nvidia acknowledged to us up front that users would more than likely hack the BIOSes of non-certified X58 boards and add "cookies" to them, but said it won't get in the way of such things.
    kindof funny, i always thought it was loopy of nvidia to disallow sli on any chipset at all

    user: "i have a p35 chipset motherboard and a 8800 GT and i'd like to buy another nvidia gfx card to use in sli"
    nvidia: "no!"
    user: "no, you don't understand. if you'll allow SLI on p35 i'll buy another one of your graphics cards to put in my computer"
    nvidia: "no!"
    user: "no no, i mean like, i'll buy another nvidia gfx card, and you'll make money off the sale of that extra gfx card"
    nvidia: "no!"
    user: "....mmk" /buys a 4850

  18. #43
    iadstudio
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ShArKo View Post
    imagine the forceware 180-series eneable the SLI support on x38/x48 motherboards !!
    Ever hopeful, but I doubt it. I'm guessing the architecture is different enough that x38 & x48 compatibility will not happen but I'm no expert.

    Any expert opinions on this issue?

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,696
    Quote Originally Posted by hollo View Post
    *snip*
    I know, it seems so logical to allow it on all platforms, they would make a huge amount of cash with people that have 975x, 965, p35, p45, x3/48 but nooooo
    Workstation:
    3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
    4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
    Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
    Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
    Destop Audio:
    Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
    Man Cave:
    PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
    Gaming on the go:
    Alienware M18x
    i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
    2*6990 | WLED 1080P
    2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
    BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU

    2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,210
    @ hollo: great post
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by iadstudio View Post
    Ever hopeful, but I doubt it. I'm guessing the architecture is different enough that x38 & x48 compatibility will not happen but I'm no expert.

    Any expert opinions on this issue?
    I'm not an expert, but there is no technological reason why they couldn't enable it. My understanding is that SLI could be enabled through drivers on any platform

    The reason stems from a business standpoint. If they stand to increase revenue through BIOS licensing/board certification + nF200 sales on x58, there is no way they are going to enable it on x38 and x48 "for free"

    We as consumers are still going to pay "Nvidia Tax". Even those that don't want it will probably have to pay extra$ for the board certification. Since the board certification is only a BIOS modification, not a hardware chip, it is unlikely mobo manufacturers will make several SKU's around "certified" vs "uncertified" - forcing everyone to pay extra - as the Mobo manufacturers will just pass along the any additional costs.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
    Posts
    1,084
    both Xfire and SLI support on the same mobo??

    --two awesome rigs, wildly customized with
    5.1 Sony speakers, Stereo 3D, UV Tourmaline Confexia, Flame Bl00dr4g3 Fatal1ty
    --SONY GDM-FW900 24" widescreen CRT, overclocked to:
    2560x1600 resolution at 68Hz!(from 2304x1440@80Hz)

    Updated List of Video Card GPU Voodoopower Ratings!!!!!

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    No(r)way
    Posts
    452
    I'm not paying anything to Nvidia for a "feature" that I'll never use, if I ever go X58 I'll make sure to get a board that doesn't support these blackmail tactics, we pay enough for those damn graphics cards. "Certification fee", how stupid is that? This is a loud and clear statement from Nvidia that they don't want my money any longer, I take the hint.
    Obsolescence be thy name

  24. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by hollo View Post
    kindof funny, i always thought it was loopy of nvidia to disallow sli on any chipset at all

    user: "i have a p35 chipset motherboard and a 8800 GT and i'd like to buy another nvidia gfx card to use in sli"
    nvidia: "no!"
    user: "no, you don't understand. if you'll allow SLI on p35 i'll buy another one of your graphics cards to put in my computer"
    nvidia: "no!"
    user: "no no, i mean like, i'll buy another nvidia gfx card, and you'll make money off the sale of that extra gfx card"
    nvidia: "no!"
    user: "....mmk" /buys a 4850
    ASUS P8Z77-V Pro | 3770K | 16GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 | VID | Samsung 830 128GB | 2x Seagate Barracuda 3TB | SeaSonic X750

  25. #50
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    so now we have it officially: NVIDIA lost to Intel on this game of smartassing! They didn't get licence for QPI for their own chipset, then mobo manufacturers told them to stuff NV200 where Sun don't shine, and finally they simply gave up and are trying to do any damage recovery in a fear that enthusiastic market will go only with x58+ATI CFX combo... this is end of the line for any NVIDIA ambitions for part of chipset market on Intel platform in the future!
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •