Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
Here is a basic scientific issue with that idea. To transmute something so to say, guess how much energy you need. You need alot more than you got from your fission process. hence its not a viable solution. Unless you put your money on future technology to compensate for current waste.

If the world applied civic economics global warming and renewable energy wouldnt be a problem. We already today have all technologies. Even 10-20 years ago. But greed and stupidity is preventing it.

or in short. Instant gratification. Its like having to choose between a candy bar now. Or 10 candy bars in 1 years. And you choose the 1 candy bar now.
i think you sit in front of the computer too much over there in denmark. Tell me what all these technologies are. Look if there was a viable solution today that didnt have any problems with it, believe me everybody would be doing it. Just because you think in your mind that renewable energy is viable option doesnt mean it is. Technology isnt there yet. And dont say nuclear because guess what mines all that ore out of the ground....... fossil fuels. Wind is good only if its windy. Solar is good only if its sunny and isnt night and just to mention the fact that solar panels take more energy to manufacture than they will produce in there lifetime. Bio is good but has along way to go still.

The world uses ~87,000,000 bbd of oil. Nuclear,wind,solar isnt going to put a dent into that since we get alot of products from oil not just energy. All of your suggestions only generates electricity. The world isnt running out of coal.