Not bad at all, just funny to make a dual-quad-45nm-65nm-highend-lowend comparison.
I did the same on purpose, to show how illogical that comparison was, hence the![]()
Again, is nice compared to Agena, as I said in my first post. A 6GHz PIII or a 4GHz Athlon are nice too, but useless. I want AMD to be on par with Intel not only in overclocking, but in perfomance too, because that is what matters. I don't have my Intel at 4GHz just for the sake of it, I have it like that because I want/need that perfomance. You have your Phenom at 2,50GHz for the same reason right?
1. Because there are no E0 quadcores yet.
2. Because I don't have any experience with current Yorkfields, and usually I don't use info from others about something I have not tried myself first. But if you want quad comparisons go ask at what voltages the people in the P5Q Deluxe thread have their quads at 4GHz, crushing Agena/Deneb in perfomance, power consumption and perfomance/watt.
Ironically hypocritical is the fact that some AMD users first cry about Intel being present in AMD threads, and then the same users use Intel in those same threads trying to make AMD look better (and failing). I don't care as a happy Intel user, but way to go![]()
Bookmarks