MMM
Page 13 of 34 FirstFirst ... 31011121314151623 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 837

Thread: Apogee GTZ

  1. #301
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK, a small place with a big heart
    Posts
    273
    Quote Originally Posted by gabe View Post
    very sound observation..

    but I'm practical, so let's push this one step further

    Either things go back to the way they are.. a few independants doing this as a hobby, for glory or fun, and/or some free hardware, or {suggestion} we take a tight knit community like XS interested in uncompromised data, and set up a fee based section of the forum to publish that data.. There are many practical issues with that, but it could be a way to get it done..

    Someone rightfully suggested that reviewers should be compensated. Everybody agress (I think) that manufacturers cannot/should not/must not be involved. So how does it get done?

    Hi all,

    I am currently in the market for a new WB and trying to look into the best product came across this thread, and started reading through the posts eagerly to see some test data and analysis...

    I have gotten as far as this post and have been following the conversation with interest...

    I have to say that what Gabe has said on this point has been correct from the beginning, and that if a reviewer is to be compensated in any form, then that compensation should come from a source with no affiliation to/with any manufacturers who provide materials/products to be reviewed, but from the beneificiaries of the rreviewer...

    However this also then passes a burden onto the reviewer who might then feel obligated to provide results for those people who have provided compnesation to receive those results....

    In other words I think what Gabe suggested was some kind of subscription part of the site where subscribing users, having paid a fee, could gain access to the reviewers results, and that the subscription fee's would be passed to the reviewing members..... or maybe could be collected and distrubuted to the approved reviewers on a per review basis....

    But the situation arises then that subscribing users having paid a subscription to be able to access review data, if for whatever reason reviews cannot be submitted in a timely fashion, then would some subscribing users then feel dissatisfied with the service they have paid for.... to put it another way... the work currently udertaken by Martin et al, is at the moment unrewarded other than with the gratitude of a close knit community here at the XS forums.... I have to say I am a relatively new member, and if I'm honest I feel that I am benefiting greatly from the information that is catalogued on these forums..... I for one would be happy to pay a small subscription fee, for the privelage of being able to have access to the experience and aid that can be found here....

    Though truth be told back when I was a beginner at all this, I most likely would have justc clicked away to another site..... so its a really difficult area to address...

    What I think I would suggest is a kind of special access area that is provided for users who pay a subscription fee, and that maybe the particular area have a free to view list of: currently available reviews, author of the review, and maybe users ratings of the review as an 'x out of 5' star rating scheme..., and that the special access area also have a one-time access smaller subscription fee for a 24-hr period to a section with only the latest review, or review of their choosing........ so that users only interested in a particular review are able to decide whether or not they want to pay to gain access to that review, based on the knowledge of who has carried out the review etc...

    Again this would however be placing perhaps an unwanted burden on the likes of Martin et al, to feel an obligation to provide reviews, and adding pressure on them.....

    So I have another suggestion, and that is for a user scoring scheme in conjunction with a user subscription to be renewed on an annual basis that would be accumulated into a funds pool for the forum, that would be administered by a reputable and long-standing senior member, or site administrator...... and for each review that a reviewer contributes, and that other users rate at say 3-4 out of 5, or some other way of showing approval for the review........ that the site admin provide a pre-approved amount to the review submitter, from a pool of the accumulated subscription fee's....

    The amount paid for each review needn't be a huge amount of money, as I'm sure that poeple like Martin and others would be appreciative of any gesture of thanks for their work, that might be of assistance to them in subsidising a little of the expense they incur.

    This would leave the reviewers free of any burden, would leave manufacturers out of the rewarding scheme, reviewers woud get rewarded based on the quality of the review submitted by them, and also by the gratitude of the Forum User Base...., and the remainder of the forums would still be accessible to non-subscription paying members...!!!!

    Anyway with all that said I'm going to continue readin the rest of the thread and gain from the insights posted here...!!!!!

    Just wanted to add my 2c's worth....!!!!!

    PS: Wonder if Gabe or anyone else can advise if this is going to come with a AM2 mounting plate, or if one can be purchased optionally... the WB is avaialbe now for pre-order at this site: http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showpr...odid=WC-032-SW and it says that AM2 etc would also see possible benefits from the newly mapped surface....but theres no mention of a compatible AM2 mounting kit, or an option of pruchasing one.... I really want o place my order, but need to know this first...!!!!

    TIA
    Last edited by kazgirl; 07-30-2008 at 04:41 PM.
    Phenom II 940BE (CACVC AC 0850BPMW) @ 3.8Ghz (1.475v) on Custom h2O
    ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe - BIOS v0703 - HT @ 1.8Ghz / NB @ 2.2Ghz / PCIE @ 100Mhz
    2 x 2GB G.SKill PC2-8500 RAM @ 5-5-5-15 2T (Unganged) | 2 x GeCube HD4850's CF @ 700/1150
    2 x 160GB Samsung Spinpoints (RAID-0) | 1 x 320GB Seagate 7200.10 (JBOD)
    Thermaltake Toughpower 750W PSU | Samsung 206BW 20" LCD Screen
    Vista Home Premium 64-bit SP2 / Win7 Ultimate Beta 64-bit

    ========================================
    ========================================
    3DMark Vantage Score = P13403 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=791574
    3DMark06 Score = 20027 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9996881


    ========================================

    My External LCS Mod - http://s91.photobucket.com/albums/k2...t=1f046259.flv

    ========================================


  2. #302
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,478
    Quote Originally Posted by kazgirl View Post
    <snip>
    Nice post kazgirl, there's definately some good ideas in there.

    Now, it's around 10.30am here in OZ (July 31st), which means the evening is quickly dissapearing over in the good 'ol US of A, and no internal shots to speak of?

  3. #303
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    415
    getting kind of late for release on the 30th, (1:30 left on the east coast), is this block releasing today?
    Xigmatek elysium
    i7 920, 4.2 at 1.32v 60C after 24 hours prime 95
    asus p6t6 ws revolution
    4870 1gb
    6gigs ddr3 1600
    x25-160 g2, velociraptor 300gig, 4x 2tb hitachi 7200rpm on an lsi 9260-81
    lg bd/hdvd combo
    apogee xt rev 2.0, swiftech 360, 240 with 4 sanyo denki's
    and 1 scythe (25mm did not have space for another 38mm)
    2 d5's in a koolance 425x2 res

  4. #304
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,855
    He's not obligated to release any product at any time for any reason.

    He's also on Pacific Standard Time, not Eastern Standard Time. So, its at least two more hours till midnight where he is.

    Just relax.
    Last edited by IanY; 07-30-2008 at 08:45 PM.

  5. #305
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Imperial Palace, UDE of Pitatopia
    Posts
    8,396
    Just my here on the "paid tester being paid by the beneficiaries of their work" thing. If a review of a certain product is good enough (favorable), it will spread by word of mouth at various forums such as this one, that product will then start to fly off shelves at a pace that only enthusiasts can make happen and then who becomes the beneficiary?.....the manufacturer.....that's who. It's a double edged sword stuck in the middle of a mine field in the middle of a war zone. Again, it's just my , so no need to beat me over the head.
    Circles SucQ!

    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig

    Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!

  6. #306
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by Martinm210 View Post
    FYI, I was fortunate enough to get one of these on the way also..
    Hell ya, I love the looks of this block and can't wait to see how it performs. Almost got the SNBW-REVA for my NB but wasn't sure it was worth the extra cash just for some bling. Can't wait for the reviews

  7. #307
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    393
    Yea I agree, the manufacturer makes the money not us; I don't see how the users should have to pay in any way other than with donations.

    Here's another idea: Martin could have advertising on his site, similar to the business model of SPCR (www.silentpcreview.com). I think that'd be a pretty viable route if the traffic is decent. Martin has been expanding his site quite a bit, so I think it's possible. People "all over the world" would go to Martin's site, not just XS subscribers. SPCR proves that this model is viable because they have established a platform of trust. I think Martin has that trust and reputation with the community, and he can pull it off.

  8. #308
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK, a small place with a big heart
    Posts
    273
    Quote Originally Posted by migueld View Post
    Yea I agree, the manufacturer makes the money not us; I don't see how the users should have to pay in any way other than with donations.
    Well thats precisely what you'd be doing with a small subscribtion for access to not just the one review, but all reviews by all reviewers for the entire year, you'd be making a donation, to show your appreciation of the work that rewviewers have put in, of course if you don't want to make such a donation then you don't have to, you can still browse and use the remainder of the forums as usual, just not have access to the reviews that have been submitted... Maybe an annual subscription of $10.00 thats not a lot of money, but if enough users were to subscribe, then that money could be pooled and perhaps a set amount per review could be distrinbuted to a reviewer based on the users scoring of the review submitted, this would be to prevent all and sundry from submitting reviews of no significance, so that only reviews rated by users as meeting a certain quality would receive the set amount from the pool of funds available.

    But ssome people aren't interested in reading all reviews about everything but are perhaps more interested in reading a particular review on a particular component..... thats where the idea of a reduced one time only subscription comes in, say if you are considering replacing a specific component and want to read a review on just that....there could be say a $1.00 one time access fee, that permits access to the subscribed area for a 24hr period, or for limited perid of time.... You could see a list of available reviews before deciding, and guage from users ratings of the review based on the score provided by them for that review, before deciding whether or not you think it may be worth reading or not....

    You'd be making a small donation towards the pool that is used to reward reviewers for their time spent and effort made in providing us with an unbiased honest evaluation of the product in question, somethng which is not eay to come by these days....


    Here's another idea: Martin could have advertising on his site, similar to the business model of SPCR (www.silentpcreview.com). I think that'd be a pretty viable route if the traffic is decent. Martin has been expanding his site quite a bit, so I think it's possible. People "all over the world" would go to Martin's site, not just XS subscribers. SPCR proves that this model is viable because they have established a platform of trust. I think Martin has that trust and reputation with the community, and he can pull it off.
    I do understand and agree that yes, if a particular product is rated highly by a reviewer that the manufacturers ultimately profit as a result, however it swings both ways, if a product is rated as being poor by a reviewer then that same product will most likely sit on the shelves...

    so if any manufacturer were to consider sponsoring such a reviewer in the manner of advertisments on the users site etc, then of course the impartiality of the review falls under question, which then obviates any benefits of the review in the first place.... by charging or receiving money from any manufacturers for placing an advertisement on their site, the reviewer would essentially be endorsing that manufacturer, so thats clearly not a viable option...!!!

    And we're not talking about Martin alone here, there are other reputable and appreciated users who submit their reviews here, some of which may not have sites of their own dedicated to their reviews, so how would they be rewarded....!!!!

    How many of you buy a car without first having paid for it to be checked over, or maybe even buying a magazine to read up on the attributes of a boat, if your buying a dog you pay the vet to check it out first etc... you don't even think twice about it, but yet, when it comes to similar for PC parts, you make a huge fuss about the possibility of not being able to access something without having to pay for it in some fashion.....
    Phenom II 940BE (CACVC AC 0850BPMW) @ 3.8Ghz (1.475v) on Custom h2O
    ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe - BIOS v0703 - HT @ 1.8Ghz / NB @ 2.2Ghz / PCIE @ 100Mhz
    2 x 2GB G.SKill PC2-8500 RAM @ 5-5-5-15 2T (Unganged) | 2 x GeCube HD4850's CF @ 700/1150
    2 x 160GB Samsung Spinpoints (RAID-0) | 1 x 320GB Seagate 7200.10 (JBOD)
    Thermaltake Toughpower 750W PSU | Samsung 206BW 20" LCD Screen
    Vista Home Premium 64-bit SP2 / Win7 Ultimate Beta 64-bit

    ========================================
    ========================================
    3DMark Vantage Score = P13403 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=791574
    3DMark06 Score = 20027 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9996881


    ========================================

    My External LCS Mod - http://s91.photobucket.com/albums/k2...t=1f046259.flv

    ========================================


  9. #309
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK, a small place with a big heart
    Posts
    273
    Hi Andyc...

    Thanks for clarifying your thoughts and feelings on the subject, I only stumbled into this thread whilst looking for data on the new GTZ block and after reading some of the earlier posts I got the impression that many users felt they wanted to show their appreciation for the work that you, Martin, Scott and others do, or that it should be rewarded in some fashion...

    I feel the same thing myself, and just wanted to offer my own thoughts on the matter in response to the posts I have read in this thread.

    It would be nice to know that users like myself can show appreciation for the work that you all do, that we ultimately benefit from, it saves us more in $$$/£££ from having to buy and try, and replace different components etc...

    Somehow just saying Thank You in a post doesn't seem enough after all the hard work that you all put in, even if its a passionate hobby that you enjoy doing...!!!

    I also appreciate that none of you should ever under any circumstances feel any obligation to carry out the testing and reviews you provide, and thats why I made the second sggestion above (in response to an earlier reply from Gabe who was in turn responding to others posts calling for some kind of renumeration from the manufacturers where he suggested that forum users initiate some kind of renumeration if thats what was felt), so that this kind of situation would not/could not occur...

    I am sure that you are all aware of how much all your hard work and efforts are appreciated by all the forums users.... and I'm sure that I speak for everyone else when I say this.

    I think at the end of the day though that if everyone is happy enough with the status quo, then there's no need to change anything....

    Just wanted to say Thank You...!!!!
    Phenom II 940BE (CACVC AC 0850BPMW) @ 3.8Ghz (1.475v) on Custom h2O
    ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe - BIOS v0703 - HT @ 1.8Ghz / NB @ 2.2Ghz / PCIE @ 100Mhz
    2 x 2GB G.SKill PC2-8500 RAM @ 5-5-5-15 2T (Unganged) | 2 x GeCube HD4850's CF @ 700/1150
    2 x 160GB Samsung Spinpoints (RAID-0) | 1 x 320GB Seagate 7200.10 (JBOD)
    Thermaltake Toughpower 750W PSU | Samsung 206BW 20" LCD Screen
    Vista Home Premium 64-bit SP2 / Win7 Ultimate Beta 64-bit

    ========================================
    ========================================
    3DMark Vantage Score = P13403 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=791574
    3DMark06 Score = 20027 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9996881


    ========================================

    My External LCS Mod - http://s91.photobucket.com/albums/k2...t=1f046259.flv

    ========================================


  10. #310
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lost
    Posts
    422
    The problem with the "24 hour access fee" is that there's nothing preventing someone from simply making a copy of every review on the board. Similarly the problem with a subscription board as you pointed out earlier is that the users return on investment is dependent on the reviewers providing timely reviews. Furthermore it then adds overhead on the board maintainers in trying to determine how "useful" particular reviews are so that the revenue can be distributed equitably to all the reviewers.

    Because of all these problems, I think a simpler and more straightforward approach is to simply have paid reviews. You can think of it as buying a subscription to a single review. For instance, say Martin posts a review of a new CPU block. XS could put the review up and put a fee for viewing it, say a one time payment of $5 - $50 (whatever everyone decides is fair, would have to be worked out such that it's affordable, but sufficiently compensates the author). Once you've paid to read a review you can come back and read it anytime you want. The money then goes directly to the author of the review (or if it's a joint review to the authors divided as they agree when they post the review). I'm sure even it $5 a review martin could make a killing on here and would be more than amply rewarded for his efforts.

    Now, for the problems with this idea. First, Martin is very good about comprehensive reviews, when he posts a review it's usually on a broad swath of products. With a pay per review system the temptation would be to break such all encompassing reviews into multiple reviews, one for each product (not saying martin would do this, I'm just playing devils advocate ). There's also the question then of when posting advice to other members who ask questions, do we respond with bits of knowledge we've obtained from one of the pay reviews, or do we post a link to the review and tell the person to buy it? On the one hand, by reading the review the knowledge has effectively been transfered to us, but on the other hand by redistributing that knowledge for free we're depriving the reviewer of compensation.

  11. #311
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lost
    Posts
    422
    For what it's worth I mostly agree with MCoffey, I don't think subscription items are a good idea on here, my previous post was really just analyzing and offering suggestions on other posts. I do feel some sort of standards body such as ISO or UL needs to be established by the manufacturers jointly to provide guarantees of accuracy on reported figures, but that really has nothing to do with us or this board.

  12. #312
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Grinchville Embassy; Santa Cruz, Aruba
    Posts
    599
    omg posts are starting to get long
    and still no internal???





    Q9450 @3.60 Ghz, Striker II Formula, Evga 9800GTX (863/2050/1200), 2X2gb 1100 5,5,5,18 D9's at 2.20V
    Cooled by: MCR320, D-Tek Fuzion V2, MCP335 w/ EK G3/8 TOPS, Full BP high flow 1/2" fittings
    Oh and Vista Ultimate (i know, I KNOW!)

  13. #313
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by 71 (Bryan) View Post
    omg posts are starting to get long
    and still no internal???
    Seriously, I'm dying here....

  14. #314
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    500

    xtremesystems: home of the hype hype hype
    [ Lian-Li V1000B // EP45-UD3P // E8400 // HD4870 ]
    [ W/C by EK, MIPS, D-tek, Bitspower, Swiftech, XSPC]
    [ Project LucentTide - WORKLOG! ]

  15. #315
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Grinchville Embassy; Santa Cruz, Aruba
    Posts
    599
    wel , im not exactly dying but im really curious





    Q9450 @3.60 Ghz, Striker II Formula, Evga 9800GTX (863/2050/1200), 2X2gb 1100 5,5,5,18 D9's at 2.20V
    Cooled by: MCR320, D-Tek Fuzion V2, MCP335 w/ EK G3/8 TOPS, Full BP high flow 1/2" fittings
    Oh and Vista Ultimate (i know, I KNOW!)

  16. #316
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    640
    Quote Originally Posted by 71 (Bryan) View Post
    wel , im not exactly dying but im really curious
    I'm actually dying......so wtf, let's go here.

  17. #317
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lost
    Posts
    422

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by 71 (Bryan) View Post
    omg posts are starting to get long
    and still no internal???
    Oh sorry, I tend towards the verbose and pedantically accurate, and often grammatically obtuse, and apparently I'm not the only one .



    Back on topic, I too am anxious to see the insides of this thing, but if we keep raging on him about updates he's never going to give us a solid release date again .

  18. #318
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    500
    Let's play the silent game.

    Ready, go...
    [ Lian-Li V1000B // EP45-UD3P // E8400 // HD4870 ]
    [ W/C by EK, MIPS, D-tek, Bitspower, Swiftech, XSPC]
    [ Project LucentTide - WORKLOG! ]

  19. #319
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Grinchville Embassy; Santa Cruz, Aruba
    Posts
    599
    lol,
    oh , i lost :





    Q9450 @3.60 Ghz, Striker II Formula, Evga 9800GTX (863/2050/1200), 2X2gb 1100 5,5,5,18 D9's at 2.20V
    Cooled by: MCR320, D-Tek Fuzion V2, MCP335 w/ EK G3/8 TOPS, Full BP high flow 1/2" fittings
    Oh and Vista Ultimate (i know, I KNOW!)

  20. #320
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lost
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by 71 (Bryan) View Post
    lol,
    oh , i lost :
    Dude, you suck at this game....

    What? Why is everyone looking at me like that?

  21. #321
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    1,315
    So any pics of the internals yet?
    Phenom 9950BE @ 3.24Ghz| ASUS M3A78-T | ASUS 4870 | 4gb G.SKILL DDR2-1000 |Silverstone Strider 600w ST60F| XFI Xtremegamer | Seagate 7200.10 320gb | Maxtor 200gb 7200rpm 16mb | Samsung 206BW | MCP655 | MCR320 | Apogee | MCW60 | MM U2-UFO |

    A64 3800+ X2 AM2 @3.2Ghz| Biostar TF560 A2+ | 2gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2-800 | Sapphire 3870 512mb | Aircooled inside a White MM-UFO Horizon |

    Current Phenom overclock


    Max Phenom overclock

  22. #322
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    439
    I think the release has been pushed back to September 7th. (Day after my birthday, hehe.) Swiftech page says "7-9-08 New products release", which is either September 7th or July 9th, but we're a little past July 9th, so...

  23. #323
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    235
    The 7-9-08 release date was for the mosfet heatsinks directly underneath it.

  24. #324
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    439
    Oh. *sheepish*

  25. #325
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Evje, Norway
    Posts
    3,419
    Well... we did all the hyping.
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    Not to be outdone by rival ATi, nVidia's going to offer its own drivers on EA Download Manager.
    X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
    Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
    HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
    Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
    C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
    DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
    Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab

Page 13 of 34 FirstFirst ... 31011121314151623 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •