Originally Posted by knightwolf654
this from a random cpu-z
i take it this is wrong as well???
taken from here....
http://www.tcmagazine.com/comments.php?id=20790&catid=2
every single one i have looked at so far has the same pattern. its not a fake. if you believe otherwise please prove it.
Well, if you so wish. That one also has the artifacts overlapping the numbers a bit on the left. The 4GHz one clearly has a cut that is extremely close to the numbers for some reason. I'd even go as far as saying that the pattern was recognize to be the same right at the numbers, so that section was either pasted in, or... something else took that space.
As for AOD, the texts and numbers are not anti-aliased (which means you only have to use paint to modify it).If this was legit, the poster could have just done a verification and then post it along. Simple as that. Why bother showing a screenshot? And if it's a screenshot, I can create a 9GHz Intel quad-core running at 1.08v, too.
Like keithlm said, there's not enough to show that this is true or fake. But I'm leaning towards fake due to:
1) The poster was a person who just registered on overclockers.net to post specifically one screenshot without any verification.
2) The weird artifacts up there. Would not have been suspicious if it didn't make a clean cut right at the numbers. It should expand a bit before the numbers (a bit to the left) at least. We've had two CPU-Z screenshots showing that now.
3) Weirdest thing since UFO: WoW on a Phenom test system?
4) What kind of "stock cooler" can sustain 53C maximum load... for a quad-core processor running at 4GHz... on almost 1.5v vCore?
)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks