Results 1 to 25 of 241

Thread: AMD 45nm Deneb Pictures, CPU-Z and Super Pi Results

Threaded View

  1. #11
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by _Lone_Wolf_ View Post
    Power budget limitations would be my guess, they seem obsessive about performance per watt over simply raw performance numbers. The SRAM cells are identical between Phenom's level 2 and 3 caches so it seems unlikely they causing the limitation, that said I can recall JumpingJack suggesting AMD's 65nm process my have issues with excessive wire delay which would impact on level 3 cache.

    I wonder if AM3 will see a boost in northbridge clockrate as an enticement to upgrade. The 1.8GHz clock in the enginering sample might be simply to maintain AM2+ compatability, or maybe thats just wishfull thinking... (?)
    interesting theorie, if it really turns out that 65nm was "bad" process and 45nm is a lot better it might be possible that deneb can outperform yorkfield. I think they still can't outperfrom nehalem (with the results that we where given till now), but it seems they can demand more money for deneb then for K10 which is a good thing.
    Last edited by Cooper; 07-13-2008 at 05:00 AM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •