Quote Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
i was telling the people crying well the 9950 isn't clocking higher than the 9850....no sherlock all of the windosr F3s clock the same hell i have seen 4600X2s that are F3s run with 6400BEs

i just don't see why there were so many people complaining about 9950 clocks and the extra watts it pulls. there isn't a point behind it you get what you paid for and frankly you paid for a 2.6ghz chip anything past that is your own doing and is not a reason to RMA the chip because it didnt clock over your expectations. thats just BS and those RMA'd chips are bad for AMD there was nothing wrong with them and now they cant sell them so way to go driving up prices because you can't accept a loss.

and all of that wasn't aimed at you titan it was aimed at the people who rma'd perfectly good cpu's because they didnt oc any better than the 9850s which i have to point out they were both B3 agena 65nm chips gee you think they will clock similar?
its all good........well the thing is like people have pointed out there must be some change in the cpu for that difference in voltage and we are trying to figure it out. I dont mind getting this cpu to try out. I still want the upgrade. But I can tell you this, if this cpu doesnt feel any faster than what I already have It will go back to the place I purchased it from. They have a 7 day return policy and If Im not happy itll go back.

Its a fact, we will see the truth about these once the sb750 is released. In the meantime we are here seeing if there was any change with the sb600.

On a side note I dont think you can really gauge these cpu's from the small amount of people messing with them. Maybe the issue is mobo related or bios related?? No one knows what combination may or may not work well.