Devil may cry4 gain excellent driver with PhYsX DX10 vs DX10 in Vista ultimate 32bits
Vantage PhYsX 177.39 force ware
VS
Vantage no PhYsX 175.16
Devil maycry4 DX10 Physx 177.39 force ware AA4X AF 16X Super high
VS
Devil maycry4 DX10 no Physx 175.16 force ware AA4X AF 16X Super high
Best performance DX10 Devil mayCry4 PhYsX force ware 177.39
Last edited by doomwill; 06-21-2008 at 07:03 AM.
that's massive
great benches and nice hardware pr0n, too bad i can't afford ln2 as im an unemployed 15 year old :P
So Vince when did you sign the shoe deal? Why did you go with Etnies, I always thought you were a DC guy?![]()
Last edited by Planet; 06-20-2008 at 03:16 PM.
Originally Posted by 3oh6
Originally Posted by Brian y.
jake, that is the worst picture ever :P
オタク
"Perfection is a state you should always try to attain, yet one you can never reach." - me =)
Sorry freak for some reason my camera is acting up.
Originally Posted by 3oh6
Originally Posted by Brian y.
177.39 plus the PhysX driver is nice-
Vantage single GTX 280 690|2300 177.39 + PhysX-
P13855
GPU 11318
CPU 42289
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/6906/van3pp7.jpg
validate-
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=182179
Sorry for OT: roflHarry Potter muahaha
Come on VInce, break 100k, that setup is able to do more than what you have shown ^^
オタク
"Perfection is a state you should always try to attain, yet one you can never reach." - me =)
Did you guys manage to get even dual GTX280 SLI working on skulltrail ?
I have a skulltrail system but cant decide what graphics cards are best to get considerign all the lanes are PCI-E 1.1.
I think maybe 5800mhz+ could do low 90's, but 100k is pushing it.
Futuremark removed all the gtx280 scores from the orb and has now instituted their driver approval policy for vantage as well as the other 3dmarks guys. They are just doing their job as driver approval policy implementation is normal for 3dmark and was already planned for vantage.
I wonder if the timing had something to do with thating lame ass article the inquirer wrote about NVIDIA cheating yesterday
That article is the biggest POS I have ever seen btw, looked liked it was co-written by AMD and INTEL
![]()
Until they implement NVIDIA's physX technology into the scoring officially, we will have to run EIGHT benchmarks on LN2 for vantage...4 presets with approved/non physX drivers if you want HOF spot, and then again with the physX drivers for the big numbers and highest scores
Here are some new vantage high scores
Entry:
Performance:
High:
Extreme:
![]()
Last edited by k|ngp|n; 06-24-2008 at 08:29 AM.
Sweet update and Vince its all about keep pushing it...
"Based on the specification and design of the CPU tests, GPU make, type or driver version may not have a significant effect on the results of either of the CPU tests as indicated in Section 7.3 of the 3DMark Vantage specification and whitepaper."
Since NVIDIA's PhysX driver affects dramatically to results of CPU tests it might never be accepted as official score.
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
Sampsa you know that the test is a Physics test, no one expected it to be so strong/body slam ATI.
End result is the consumers get more for their money for the better performing card in physics, ATI wants nothing more than to snuff it as quickly as possible or they loose more market share.
Im running UT3 now and blown away. Vince we gotta meet up online and battle it out.
Nice score bump btw.
Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
64GB Galax Hall of Fame
Intel Optane
Platimax 1245W
Intel 3175X
Asus Dominus Extreme
GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
96GB Patriot Steel
Intel Optane 900P RAID
Yes sure, but regarding to Futuremark's rules it was designed to test CPU Physics, not GPU physics which is ALREADY being tested in Game tests 1 & 2. The "problem" Futuremark is facing is that NVIDIA bought AGEIA in the middle of 3DMark Vantage development.
And since there are alot more games using Havok's physics engine than AGEIA's PhysX it's kinda stupid that Futuremark implemented support for PPU in the first place.
Anyway, will be interesting to see how things go on. Lets stay in the subject. Sorry about offtopic![]()
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
So sweet numbers k|ngp|n.., mama mia.., :-)
One more
The Inquirer article was written by Charlie Demerjian. Rumor says this happened in Taiwan Computex 2008:
"Perez started laying down some ground rules, Charlie said, no, no, hell, no, what the F**’s wrong with you, you deaf – no.
Body builder and short fused Perez had had just about enough and before anyone could blink, karate trained Perez had ninjaed his dish of eggs right into Charlie’s face.
Swift acting guards quickly defused the situation as Demerjian was in the process of loading his quart bottle of Coke with Mentos – the carnage was avoided but it was a tense few moments. Both men were escorted out of the restaurant, through separate doors and the police took over after that."
http://jonpeddie.com/jpr/blogs/attempted_rapprochement/
Last edited by Sampsa; 06-24-2008 at 09:26 AM.
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
Bookmarks