Page 58 of 180 FirstFirst ... 8485556575859606168108158 ... LastLast
Results 1,426 to 1,450 of 4486

Thread: Real Temp - New temp program for Intel Core processors

  1. #1426
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    58
    CoreTemp has a Vista sidebar gadget out now, you must be making them sweat unclewebb. If and when RealTemp has one available I'll ditch CoreTemp. Thanks for all your hard work.

    http://www.overclock.net/software-ne...p-add-ons.html


  2. #1427
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    The VID that most programs are displaying seems to be motherboard dependent and changes to your C1E / SpeedStep settings in the bios or in the Power Options settings in Windows will effect what programs report for VID.

    During testing yesterday on a Dell Core2Duo laptop, RealTemp reported 4 different VID values as the mobile chip transitioned from idle to full load.

    In my post above:
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1409

    there are screen shots of two different values and here's a third screen shot during testing last night.



    There were 4 different VID values displayed for the same processor in the same motherboard:

    1.0625
    1.1375
    1.2125
    1.2750

    This motherboard / chip combo also displayed 4 different multiplier transitions.
    x6.0 , x8.0, x10.0 , x12.0

    Both CPU-Z, when set to report VID, and RealTemp were reporting the exact same numbers for MHz and VID during these transitions. CoreTemp 0.99 also reported these changes but it was reporting slightly different values that were a little lower. CoreTemp reported 0.9500 for the minimum VID and 1.1625 for the maximum.

    In my opinion, the way users are comparing VID numbers is meaningless. Everyone assumes that a low VID means that you have a "good", highly overclockable chip but if VID changes depending on the motherboard you're using then whatever all these programs, including RealTemp, is displaying may not mean a hell of a lot. The Intel documentation for reading VID is about as clear as it is for trying to figure out TjMax.

    loonym: I think you noticed this VID problem with RealTemp when you ran the same CPU on two different boards. Did both boards have the same maximum VID at full load or were they both different?

    Nano74: RealTemp 2.61 is in beta testing right now but I like it's smaller size and likely increased stability better already. Go to TechPowerUp and download version 2.60 and then you can go to my beta section and download version 2.61 and copy the new RealTemp.exe file into your RealTemp folder and replace the version 2.60 exe file.

    http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip

    I don't like changing the main download until I get some feedback from XS users who have been a great source of ideas and the main reason why RealTemp has become a decent little temp monitoring program.

    Edit: Thanks Nano74: for calling my hard work s-h-i-t. What do you know about TjMax that I don't know? If you are convinced that it is some other value than enter that value into RealTemp and be happy. Please post your vast knowledge about TjMax so we can all be enlightened.

    Sorry Uncle, i didn t know that u was working on it, and is saying sh·$%$· because is the same temps tahn 2.60, but dont insult your work, very sorry really!!
    Q9450
    ZALMAN CNPS9700 LED
    ASUS P5Q DELUXE
    MSI 280GTX OC EDITION
    2x2 GSKILL 1000mhz(GBPI)
    THERMALTAKE M9
    DELL 2009WFP

  3. #1428
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    246
    How do you calibrate real temp? I see it in setting but, how do you go about setting it?
    Desktop - Asus P4C800-E Deluxe Rev 2.0 Fully Hell-Modded
    3.0C @ 3.824 255fsb 1.65vcore | SP-94 w/92mm Delta 110cfm, Tiger1 NB HS/Fan | 1gig XMS PC3500 BH-5 1:1 510mhz 2-2-2-5@3.38vdimm | Softmod Sapphire 9500np 441/348 w/SLK-900u (Vgpu@1.75v, Vddr@3.25v Hell-Modded) Cat 4.9 beta | TBSC Sound Card, NEC 1760NX-White | 2X WD 80g SE 8mb cache Raid 0, 1x 60g Maxtor storage | Antec TP550W @3.75v, 5.35v, 12.35v Hell-modded

    3DMark2001SE - Now hit 23032 | 3DMark2003 - 6912
    ............................Thanks Hell-Fire for all the modding

    Laptop -Compaq R3240US | A64 3200+ | 512mb |4x Nec 5500a DVD writer | G4 440go 64mb | 60g hard drive | Win XP-Home

  4. #1429
    Xtremely unstable
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Between Hell and Nowhere
    Posts
    2,800
    Quote Originally Posted by OC_Newbee View Post
    How do you calibrate real temp? I see it in setting but, how do you go about setting it?
    This is a good place to start: http://www.techpowerup.com/realtemp/docs.php
    dx58so
    w3520@4100
    4x1gb corsair ddr3-1333
    gtx 295
    TR ultra-x, 2 scythe ultrakaze push/pull
    xclio stablepower 1000
    vista ultimate

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    -------------------------------

    would you crunch if you thought it would save her life?

    maybe it will!

  5. #1430
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    Apology accepted Nano74.

    You're upset with the TjMax that RealTemp uses for your CPU so can you explain to me what TjMax you have chosen to use and what that's based on? Do you have any new documentation from Intel that I don't know about or any testing that you've done or is it based on some other programs that have chosen to use a different TjMax than what RealTemp uses? The competition hasn't posted any real world testing that I'm aware of.

    I think RealTemp, CoreTemp and Everest all let you select whatever TjMax you want these days so you can pick whatever program you like and adjust it accordingly.

    If you're interested in some of the testing I've done then read through this 50+ page novel. This thread is an excellent source of temperature information from all users.

    kpo6969: No need to ditch CoreTemp. As long as you've set it to use the correct TjMax, which you have, then it's full load accuracy should be the same as RealTemp. Idle temps might be out a couple of degrees but they're not that important anyhow.

    I haven't jumped on the Vista bandwagon quite yet so a sidebar for RealTemp is still a little ways off in the future. This may be sour grapes but I find CoreTemp and Everest both have too much information in their sidebars which makes it hard to see. I prefer the size of font that the weather gadget uses so it's easy to see your core temps at a glance.

    alex17 GTX: RealTemp has been using the same VID formula since it introduced this feature. I read in the E8400 thread earlier today that you can do a Register Dump in CPU-Z and it will show you the max VID in the file it creates near the top. So far I haven't seen any difference between what it reports and what RealTemp reports.

  6. #1431
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    I was playing around with a slightly different user interface this evening.
    Someone once asked if I could make the temps stand out a little better.
    The important numbers are pretty easy to read from a distance with this version.



    If you want to take it out for a run then download it here and place the .exe in your RealTemp directory as usual.

    http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip

    Any feedback is always appreciated. After staring at the old version for the last few months I thought it was time for a change.
    Last edited by unclewebb; 06-15-2008 at 10:44 PM.

  7. #1432
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    ARIZONA
    Posts
    1,564
    EXELLENT !! unclewebb thats helps all us 1 eyed clockers hahahahaaa

    finally can use your program whith my new E8400 hot rod
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    PENT E8400 batch #814A014 ...4.3 at 1.34v~4.7 at 1.45v
    FOXCONN MARS
    COOLIT Eliminator 7*c idle~27~38*c load $95bucks !
    BUFFALO FireStix's ddr2-800 do 1200 eazy at 2.1v
    OCZ 2x2 kit pc2 8500 - 1066 @1069 atm
    Quattro 1000W
    Radeon 2-4850's in crossfire
    OCZ Vertex SSD thanks Tony!
    ALL PIPED INTO HOUSE AIRCOND ;}
    *QUANTUM FORCE* saaya & sham rocks !
    *REAL TEMP*
    At least you've got some Xtreme software now for working in Xtreme situations! "Unclewebb" rocks !
    *MEMSET* Felix rocks !
    *SUPER TEC MAN* UncleJimbo rocks !
    OVERCLOCKERS MAG..http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=197660

  8. #1433
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    35n28, 97w31
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    I was playing around with a slightly different user interface this evening.
    Someone once asked if I could make the temps stand out a little better.
    The important numbers are pretty easy to read from a distance with this version.
    ...
    If you want to take it out for a run then download it here and place the .exe in your RealTemp directory as usual.
    ...
    Any feedback is always appreciated. After staring at the old version for the last few months I thought it was time for a change.
    Here are the settings that I used...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RT v2.62 example Settings.jpg 
Views:	633 
Size:	172.1 KB 
ID:	80457

    And here's RealTemp v2.62 Minimized...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RT v2.62 example for Start Bar.jpg 
Views:	599 
Size:	20.8 KB 
ID:	80458

    And here's what I previously had with RealTemp v2.60 Minimized...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RT v2.60 example for v2.62 beta.jpg 
Views:	610 
Size:	19.9 KB 
ID:	80459

    Did you intentionally leave out the degree symbols and Cs? So far that's all I see.

    By the way I do wear glasses and who knows when I will need this option.
    Last edited by msgclb; 06-15-2008 at 11:38 PM.
    | Intel Core i7-2600K | ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 | G.SKILL Sniper Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1866 | EVGA GTS 450 |
    | Swiftech APOGEE Drive II CPU Waterblock with Integrated Pump | XSPC RX360 | Swiftech MCP655-B Pump | XSPC Dual 5.25in. Bay Reservoir |
    | Thermaltake 850W PSU | NZXT SWITCH 810 | Windows 7 64-bit |

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  9. #1434
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    C:\Philippines\TPC
    Posts
    1,525
    thanks uncle...at least i don't have to use my glasses that often

  10. #1435
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Cacém, Portugal
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    I was playing around with a slightly different user interface this evening.
    Someone once asked if I could make the temps stand out a little better.
    The important numbers are pretty easy to read from a distance with this version.



    If you want to take it out for a run then download it here and place the .exe in your RealTemp directory as usual.

    http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip

    Any feedback is always appreciated. After staring at the old version for the last few months I thought it was time for a change.
    very nice layout

    did you read my suggestion ?
    Intel E6850 @ 3700 MHz @ 1,36 V (CPU-Z) @ Noctua NH-C12P
    Asus P5N-T Dlx @ 1645 MHz
    Corsair Dominator 2GB 8500C5D @ 5-5-5-15 2T @ 561 MHz @ 2,40 V
    eVGA 8800 GTS 320MB @ 670 MHz / 2000 MHz / 1617 MHz @ TR HR-03 Plus
    be quiet! Dark Power PRO 600 W
    4 x Raptor 74 GB @ raid0
    HP w2207



  11. #1436
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    msgclb: Thanks for noticing the missing symbols in the TaskBar. To center the temperature numbers in the dialog I had to remove the degree C sign but I guess they accidentally got deleted from the TaskBar as well. I'll fix that back up.

    When you're running Prime it's nice when you can see the temps from a distance. My next plan is to be able to Minimize this dialog so only the top third of it shows similar to my MHz utility so it doesn't take up too much space on the Desktop.

    Thanks HDCHOPPER. Whenever I'm checking out the E8400 thread it's always nice to see that famous quote.

    Edit: I found the missing degree C symbols and put them back where they belong in the TaskBar and System Tray areas.

    http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip
    Last edited by unclewebb; 06-16-2008 at 06:31 AM.

  12. #1437
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    35n28, 97w31
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    msgclb: Thanks for noticing the missing symbols in the TaskBar. To center the temperature numbers in the dialog I had to remove the degree C sign but I guess they accidentally got deleted from the TaskBar as well. I'll fix that back up.

    When you're running Prime it's nice when you can see the temps from a distance. My next plan is to be able to Minimize this dialog so only the top third of it shows similar to my MHz utility so it doesn't take up too much space on the Desktop.

    Edit: I found the missing degree C symbols and put them back where they belong in the TaskBar and System Tray areas.
    That fixed it!
    | Intel Core i7-2600K | ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 | G.SKILL Sniper Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1866 | EVGA GTS 450 |
    | Swiftech APOGEE Drive II CPU Waterblock with Integrated Pump | XSPC RX360 | Swiftech MCP655-B Pump | XSPC Dual 5.25in. Bay Reservoir |
    | Thermaltake 850W PSU | NZXT SWITCH 810 | Windows 7 64-bit |

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. #1438
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    C:\Philippines\TPC
    Posts
    1,525
    @uncle: would it be possible to put the min/max temps in a tabbed version? maybe as well as the settings? basically just like how cpu-z shows & could just shift from cpu to motherboard to memory via tabs. at least that would save some desktop space. just a suggestion tho

  14. #1439
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    emoners: CPU-Z like tabs is a good idea. I've never used them before so I'd have to open up my C++ book, again!

    One of the reasons why I like the Settings as a separate Window is so you can make adjustments to TjMax or the Calibration settings and see exactly what effect that has on your reported temps. At the moment, I'm just going to go for a quick and easy mini option for RealTemp so you can see the important stuff without it overtaking your Desktop.


  15. #1440
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    Apology accepted Nano74.

    You're upset with the TjMax that RealTemp uses for your CPU so can you explain to me what TjMax you have chosen to use and what that's based on? Do you have any new documentation from Intel that I don't know about or any testing that you've done or is it based on some other programs that have chosen to use a different TjMax than what RealTemp uses? The competition hasn't posted any real world testing that I'm aware of.

    I think RealTemp, CoreTemp and Everest all let you select whatever TjMax you want these days so you can pick whatever program you like and adjust it accordingly.

    If you're interested in some of the testing I've done then read through this 50+ page novel. This thread is an excellent source of temperature information from all users.

    kpo6969: No need to ditch CoreTemp. As long as you've set it to use the correct TjMax, which you have, then it's full load accuracy should be the same as RealTemp. Idle temps might be out a couple of degrees but they're not that important anyhow.

    I haven't jumped on the Vista bandwagon quite yet so a sidebar for RealTemp is still a little ways off in the future. This may be sour grapes but I find CoreTemp and Everest both have too much information in their sidebars which makes it hard to see. I prefer the size of font that the weather gadget uses so it's easy to see your core temps at a glance.

    alex17 GTX: RealTemp has been using the same VID formula since it introduced this feature. I read in the E8400 thread earlier today that you can do a Register Dump in CPU-Z and it will show you the max VID in the file it creates near the top. So far I haven't seen any difference between what it reports and what RealTemp reports.
    Thxs Uncle to recive my apologyes!


    I was lookin for Intels documentation and i didnt find anything about 45nm TJmax.
    So i was following this thread and i sow many people here posting his Temps with their proccesors with real temps and i noticed that real temp shows lower temps than everest and core temps if u dont change tjmax, for example, everest read to me 105c with out manage tjmax manualy, and core temp same thing, but with reral read me 95c in tjmax wich its reead 10c less in all cores, for example:
    Everest and Core temp: 49-39-49-49, after this i ve tested with real temp 2,63 and my temps are 39-39-32-40 and prime stable about 2 hours in real temp 45-46-38-47. so is good news in real temps because with this test temps re so lower and nice.
    So, pls Uncle u know there is 5 diferents temps , one for CPU ad 4 mmore for each core (in ma case that i ve a Quad), and the cpu temp is 34c, whic for me in prime stable increase to 42c, and is hi comparing with 65nm or another 45nm that i sow in this thread. Not all is only core temps dont forget is CPU temps too, pls explain me if i m wrong bout avg cpu temps is 60c when i OC my q9450 to 3,7ghz with a zalman 9700 and mx-2 termic paste.

    tnxs for your knowledges!

    See u
    Q9450
    ZALMAN CNPS9700 LED
    ASUS P5Q DELUXE
    MSI 280GTX OC EDITION
    2x2 GSKILL 1000mhz(GBPI)
    THERMALTAKE M9
    DELL 2009WFP

  16. #1441
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    Do you want to turn your processor into one of those super chips that has a nice low VID?



    One quick change and my Q6600 drops VID from 1.325 to 1.1625. Perfect for a screen shot or when heading to EBay. Buyers will pay extra for a low VID chip.

    CoreTemp, CPU-Z, Everest & RealTemp all report this lower number which means that VID probably changes depending on your motherboard as well as how it is set up. C1E did not need to be enabled in the bios on my board for this to work so give it a try and see if you can create a low VID chip for yourself. Maybe users will start comparing Min and Max VID now.

  17. #1442
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    My daughter told me I was getting a little carried away with the "eye chart" temp numbers so I've used a little restraint with the latest version.



    Once I get the mini mode working I'll post an update.

  18. #1443
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    636
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    CoreTemp, CPU-Z, Everest & RealTemp all report this lower number which means that VID probably changes depending on your motherboard as well as how it is set up. C1E did not need to be enabled in the bios on my board for this to work so give it a try and see if you can create a low VID chip for yourself. Maybe users will start comparing Min and Max VID now.
    Wow dude, what a scam. My X3360 bounces between 1.1250 and 1.2250.

  19. #1444
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    In CPU-Z if you go to the About tab and click on the Registers Dump button it will at least give you your Maximum VID value for whatever that's worth. It reports 1.325 for my Q6600.

    I think too many users have been comparing Maximum and Minimum values from different software and different versions of the same software while running on different motherboards. I hope more users post some data so we can see if there's a pattern here. At the moment, most of the VID data that's been posted in forums is useless.

  20. #1445
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,442
    Had to disable OC, back to auto get VID change to work, but that was interesting. Top pic is with laptop power scheme showing VID 1.15, bottom pic is desktop power scheme which shows my max VID of 1.225
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	vidchange.jpg 
Views:	536 
Size:	129.9 KB 
ID:	80550  

  21. #1446
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    35n28, 97w31
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    In CPU-Z if you go to the About tab and click on the Registers Dump button it will at least give you your Maximum VID value for whatever that's worth. It reports 1.325 for my Q6600.

    I think too many users have been comparing Maximum and Minimum values from different software and different versions of the same software while running on different motherboards. I hope more users post some data so we can see if there's a pattern here. At the moment, most of the VID data that's been posted in forums is useless.
    In this Core Temp 0.99 I found the Register Dump in the Options menu. I can't find any VID in the dump. After the top data as shown below, it is all hex. I haven't tried your power option yet.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RT v2.63 - CoreTemp Reg Dump.jpg 
Views:	503 
Size:	131.2 KB 
ID:	80553
    | Intel Core i7-2600K | ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 | G.SKILL Sniper Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1866 | EVGA GTS 450 |
    | Swiftech APOGEE Drive II CPU Waterblock with Integrated Pump | XSPC RX360 | Swiftech MCP655-B Pump | XSPC Dual 5.25in. Bay Reservoir |
    | Thermaltake 850W PSU | NZXT SWITCH 810 | Windows 7 64-bit |

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  22. #1447
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    msgclb: The Registers Dump in CPU-Z shows VID. I don't trust CoreTemp since version 0.99 is still getting my T7200 wrong compared to what CPU-Z says.

    I noticed a coincidence while doing some testing.



    Which one of these utilities gives you more useful info per square inch? The recent RealTemp diet has got these two ready to go head to head. I turned off RealTemp's calibration features and set TjMax=100C so at least it would be a fair fight!
    Last edited by unclewebb; 06-16-2008 at 07:24 PM.

  23. #1448
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    35n28, 97w31
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    msgclb: The Registers Dump in CPU-Z shows VID. I don't yet trust CoreTemp since version 0.99 is still getting my T7200 wrong compared to what CPU-Z says.
    oops, I haven't been getting enough sleep!
    | Intel Core i7-2600K | ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 | G.SKILL Sniper Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1866 | EVGA GTS 450 |
    | Swiftech APOGEE Drive II CPU Waterblock with Integrated Pump | XSPC RX360 | Swiftech MCP655-B Pump | XSPC Dual 5.25in. Bay Reservoir |
    | Thermaltake 850W PSU | NZXT SWITCH 810 | Windows 7 64-bit |

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  24. #1449
    Xtremely unstable
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Between Hell and Nowhere
    Posts
    2,800
    msi 780i, x3360, realtemp reports vid 1.1500, is this min as bios sets default voltage?

    DMI Baseboard
    -------------
    vendor Micro-Star International Co.,LTD
    model MS-7510
    revision 1.0
    serial To be filled by O.E.M.

    DMI BIOS
    --------
    vendor American Megatrends Inc.
    version V1.2B1
    date 06/06/2008

    Processors Information
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Processor 1 (ID = 0)
    Number of cores 4 (max 4)
    Number of threads 4 (max 4)
    Name Intel Xeon X3360
    Codename Yorkfield
    Specification Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3360 @ 2.83GHz
    Package Socket 775 LGA (platform ID = 4h)
    CPUID 6.7.7
    Extended CPUID 6.17
    Core Stepping C1
    Technology 45 nm
    Core Speed 3825.2 MHz (8.5 x 450.0 MHz)
    Rated Bus speed 1800.1 MHz
    Stock frequency 2833 MHz
    Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T
    L1 Data cache 4 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
    L1 Instruction cache 4 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
    L2 cache 2 x 6144 KBytes, 24-way set associative, 64-byte line size
    FID/VID Control yes
    FID range 6.0x - 8.5x
    max VID 1.238 V
    Features XD, VT
    dx58so
    w3520@4100
    4x1gb corsair ddr3-1333
    gtx 295
    TR ultra-x, 2 scythe ultrakaze push/pull
    xclio stablepower 1000
    vista ultimate

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    -------------------------------

    would you crunch if you thought it would save her life?

    maybe it will!

  25. #1450
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    35n28, 97w31
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    msgclb: The Registers Dump in CPU-Z shows VID. I don't trust CoreTemp since version 0.99 is still getting my T7200 wrong compared to what CPU-Z says.
    I don't have someone watching my back like you do.

    Both Real Temp 2.63 and CPU-Z dump shows VID of 1.3500v using this E6750.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RT v2.63 - CPU-Z Reg Dump.jpg 
Views:	959 
Size:	153.8 KB 
ID:	80556
    | Intel Core i7-2600K | ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 | G.SKILL Sniper Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1866 | EVGA GTS 450 |
    | Swiftech APOGEE Drive II CPU Waterblock with Integrated Pump | XSPC RX360 | Swiftech MCP655-B Pump | XSPC Dual 5.25in. Bay Reservoir |
    | Thermaltake 850W PSU | NZXT SWITCH 810 | Windows 7 64-bit |

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Page 58 of 180 FirstFirst ... 8485556575859606168108158 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •