ATI Radeon HD 4000 Series discussion

[G0ldBr1ck]

ah ha, thought it looked familiar but it was dated today so wasnt sure.

[Dragy2k]

time to give OBR a break....im waiting as much as every1 else on here for new cards to come out, but things change NDA's get pushed back and brought forwards..sometimes at the last minute.....so i say lay off!!
maybe we need an IQ test before new members join

[waver_01]

no it sounds that he just talked bull and explained it with AMD said "..."

but yeah my 4870X2 works great and without microstuttering because of one shared memory controller and shared memory dont need this slow thing of 4850

..you have the X2 already?

for real?

[lapdog]

If I had these cards I would bench them and then maybe post results. One thing I would not do it say "I'm gona...", I'd just do it. Beware of anyone just out to stir pot.

[natty]

time to give OBR a break....im waiting as much as every1 else on here for new cards to come out, but things change NDA's get pushed back and brought forwards..sometimes at the last minute.....so i say lay off!!
maybe we need an IQ test before new members join

as soon as he pays for his crimes then we'll give him a break

[Lu(ky]

Yeah OBR does this ALL THE TIME.. He did this on the Asus S2E and everybody was all over his leg humping him. Then he bailed just like now then the real man "pmp" came into the thread and finished the job that OBR started. And you guys defending him STOP already. If he willing to OPEN his mouth all the time which is often then he should be a man and finish what he started.

[fornowagain]

Lol, almost funny.

http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/cont...37881-135.html

Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT and ATI Radeon 4870 get a 225 watt TDP

With PCI Express slot providing 75 watts of juice and the motherboard another 75 watts, there is a theoretical supply of up to 225 watts. That is quite a jump in the sub-$300 segment and it makes you wonder what the reasons may be, but we are certain that overclockers won't mind. One of key limitations for the extreme overclocking of the previous generation parts was the fact that the cards (3850, 3870, 8800GT, 8800GTS512) had only one power connector.

And the reason why ATI was so popular with overclockers was the fact that you could tell the motherboard to supply 150 watts, and ATI's 3870 would eat 150 watts from the motherboard (total: 75 watts + 150 watts = 225W). With two power connectors in place for the 4850 and 4870, overclockers do not need any hacks to get access to 225 watts. In fact, the 4870 will top out at 300 watts (150 watts from the motherboard, 75+75W from connectors). The 9800GT will be restricted to 225 watts (75 watts from the motherboard)

[SimBy]

no it sounds that he just talked bull and explained it with AMD said "..."

but yeah my 4870X2 works great and without microstuttering because of one shared memory controller and shared memory dont need this slow thing of 4850

Mine too.

[STaRGaZeR]

Lol, almost funny.

http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/cont...37881-135.html

That guy is retarded or something? Please read the article

[SoulsCollective]

Well that was a disappointment. Good thing I saved those pics.

/subscribe.

[Knight]

Well that was a disappointment. Good thing I saved those pics.

/subscribe.

Do you mind PM'ing the pictures to me? I think I missed them.

[natty]

re-host them so we can all see

[003]

Me as well, please.

[SoulsCollective]

To everyone asking, no. They're not mine to repost. Please stop sending me PMs.

[natty]

To everyone asking, no. They're not mine to repost. Please stop sending me PMs.

party pooper

[disruptfam]

lolcats

[Jowy Atreides]

Do you mind PM'ing the pictures to me? I think I missed them.

you missed out on nothing

just the (very clear and professional looking) picture of the back of a pcb

all white background, it looked like a picture from a hardware site and not someones home

[zerazax]

Since he says he works for a magazine, its possible he took it at the office where they'd probably have those kinds of places anyways? (or just find a really white table lol)

[003]

To everyone asking, no. They're not mine to repost. Please stop sending me PMs.

Hmm, technically they're not yours period, correct? So why did you save them?

[Jowy Atreides]

Hmm, technically they're not yours period, correct? So why did you save them?

I did too, are you going to call the police on us for doing nothing wrong?

[Jethro]

I cant believe OBR spams that he has a card in GIANT capital letters says that he will post benchmarks as soon as he get drivers and then withdraws like a lil girl when the rubber meets the road. Way to go attention slut. Grumble, grumble... Meh friggin tease, i can wait man, no worries just dont expect any sort of credence to be given to your future post OBR.

[LowRun]

Wow Been out a few hours and look what we have right here. The usual suspect strikes again, what a shame

[003]

I did too, are you going to call the police on us for doing nothing wrong?

No, all I'm saying is, don't go around saying you can't privately give them to other people when technically you shouldn't have them either. I personally don't care that you have them, just wanted to point out the flaw in the argument of "they're not mine to give".

[SoulsCollective]

Hmm, technically they're not yours period, correct? So why did you save them?

There's a difference between posting something to the public domain, thereby giving everyone else permission to view it, and re-posting those images after the original poster has removed them and signified that the license given out to view them initially has now been revoked. There is no requirement on me to delete my copies of the images, but I cannot in good faith repost them.

As was said above, you're not missing much.

[GoldenTiger]

There's a difference between posting something to the public domain, thereby giving everyone else permission to view it, and re-posting those images after the original poster has removed them and signified that the license given out to view them initially has now been revoked. There is no requirement on me to delete my copies of the images, but I cannot in good faith repost them.

As was said above, you're not missing much.

You can't revoke a public domain license . I respect your decision not to hand them out, but don't try to claim morals = the law = the reason you're not .