GeForce 9900 GTX & GTS Slated For July Launch

[Isaac MM]

Is there any air cooling heatsinks already on the market that fits the GTX 280?

[BenchZowner]

Is there any air cooling heatsinks already on the market that fits the GTX 280?

AFAIK no, there isn't any.

[Atal]

AFAIK no, there isn't any.

there is this one for water cooling, http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...p?t=188698:up:

[BenchZowner]

there is this one for water cooling, http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...p?t=188698:up:

That's a waterblock, not a heatsink ( obviously )

[mao5]

Japan IT Media website today brings us the CRYSIS 1920*1200 VH test result of NVIDIA next generation flagship -GeForce GTX 280 Graphics Card.

According to IT Media said, NVIDIA and an anonymous motherboard manufacturer hold a secret presentation to show the performance of GTX 280 outside the Computex 2008.

The visitors said that the demonstration room is very dim lighting. In addition to show the performance of GTX 280 graphics card, the secret presentation also shown parts of the motherboards which are compatible with GTX 280, they simply had been placed on the windowsill of the room.

IT Media site had the opportunity to run GPU-Z, CPU-Z and Crysis Benchmark on the GTX 280 demo system. From the photos, we can clearly see that NVIDIA GTX 280 presentation system used Intel Core 2 Quad four-core processor, the frequency is 2.66GHz, the Crysis Benchmark with 1920 x1200 VeryHigh settings indicated that the average fps of GTX 280 graphics card reached 36.81!

source

[xlink]

Japan IT Media website today brings us the CRYSIS 1920*1200 VH test result of NVIDIA next generation flagship -GeForce GTX 280 Graphics Card.

According to IT Media said, NVIDIA and an anonymous motherboard manufacturer hold a secret presentation to show the performance of GTX 280 outside the Computex 2008.

The visitors said that the demonstration room is very dim lighting. In addition to show the performance of GTX 280 graphics card, the secret presentation also shown parts of the motherboards which are compatible with GTX 280, they simply had been placed on the windowsill of the room.

IT Media site had the opportunity to run GPU-Z, CPU-Z and Crysis Benchmark on the GTX 280 demo system. From the photos, we can clearly see that NVIDIA GTX 280 presentation system used Intel Core 2 Quad four-core processor, the frequency is 2.66GHz, the Crysis Benchmark with 1920 x1200 VeryHigh settings indicated that the average fps of GTX 280 graphics card reached 36.81!

source

uhh, at least in XP, isn't that already doable with a single 8800GTX?

he is talking the difference between High and VERY high. which is allot bigger then 2FPS. you can run High DX9, High DX10 and VERY High DX10. the difference between high DX9 and High DX10 is about 3-5 FPS (my own testing) and the difference between High DX10 and VERY high DX10 is about 10-15FPS last time i checked.

just run vhigh in dx9...

[Sr7]

Japan IT Media website today brings us the CRYSIS 1920*1200 VH test result of NVIDIA next generation flagship -GeForce GTX 280 Graphics Card.

According to IT Media said, NVIDIA and an anonymous motherboard manufacturer hold a secret presentation to show the performance of GTX 280 outside the Computex 2008.

The visitors said that the demonstration room is very dim lighting. In addition to show the performance of GTX 280 graphics card, the secret presentation also shown parts of the motherboards which are compatible with GTX 280, they simply had been placed on the windowsill of the room.

IT Media site had the opportunity to run GPU-Z, CPU-Z and Crysis Benchmark on the GTX 280 demo system. From the photos, we can clearly see that NVIDIA GTX 280 presentation system used Intel Core 2 Quad four-core processor, the frequency is 2.66GHz, the Crysis Benchmark with 1920 x1200 VeryHigh settings indicated that the average fps of GTX 280 graphics card reached 36.81!

source

Since I made a mistake and have pre-teens from third-world countries flaming me, I'll delete my post.

[Hornet331]

Look at the cpu-z chart, they are running their CPU cores at 1.6GHz? Their multiplier is too low to even reach the 2.6GHz stock clocks they claim, unless I'm missing something here.

Based on the L2 cache size, it looks to be a Q6700, so they should have a multiplier of 10, not 6

CPU-bound @ 1.6GHz anyone?

lol epic fail....


try search for EIST

[Luka_Aveiro]

Look at the cpu-z chart, they are running their CPU cores at 1.6GHz? Their multiplier is too low to even reach the 2.6GHz stock clocks they claim, unless I'm missing something here.

Based on the L2 cache size, it looks to be a Q6700, so they should have a multiplier of 10, not 6

CPU-bound @ 1.6GHz anyone?

Have you ever heard about C1E or Enhanced Intel Speedstep Technology? When idling, CPU multiplier lowers to 6x to save energy

You just reminded me all the n00bs "oh noes, i bought new Core2Duo buts cpu-z says it 1.6ghz halp plzzzz"