MMM
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 160

Thread: Nehalem and X58 show up in Taipei

  1. #76
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by Blauhung View Post
    personally I'm in it for dual tripple channel unbuffered bandwidth with Gainstown.
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  2. #77
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    66
    Can we finally get some performance figures and verify clockspeeds?

    Pretty please...

  3. #78
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by _Lone_Wolf_ View Post
    Can we finally get some performance figures and verify clockspeeds?

    Pretty please...
    Damn, you want everything..
    Ok, here you go:
    It's substantially faster than the current Yorkies.
    OK?
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  4. #79
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,061
    Quote Originally Posted by adamsleath View Post
    wot code will lynnfield chipset/s be?
    The mainstream chipset is currently referred to as "Ibexpeak"

    More info here... Nehalem Overview

    -Chris.

  5. #80
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,061
    Quote Originally Posted by initialised View Post
    Is the IHS the same size as the 775 IHS?
    Even though the pin count is nearly double, the IHS is actually not much larger due to much higher density pad spacing...



    -Chris.
    Last edited by virtualrain; 05-31-2008 at 08:26 PM.

  6. #81
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Polizei View Post
    45nm Q9450 and P45, or wait for Nehalem and X58? For some reason, I remember seeing P53, or was it P43? Is there an enthusiast chipset line like P35 is to X38/48?
    If you are planning a move to DDR3, you won't get much out of it vs DDR2 until Nehalem. Going DDR3 on Core2 technology leaves a lot of memory performance untapped due to the FSB bottleneck. However, if you want to take advantage of cheap DDR2, you might want to get a DDR2 P45 platform.

    Nehalem CPU's will likely be expensive for the first 6-12months just like initial Kentsfields were when they came out and Nehalem might hold higher price points longer than Kenty's did.

    -Chris.

  7. #82
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    Well, the 45nm/P45 question was to the other poster... I'm in the same boat. Don't know if I should jump on a 45nm dual or quad now and get P45, or just wait it out until Nehalem/X58.

    45nm quad and P45 sounds like a better idea because I would need to get new RAM with the X58. My D9GMH Ballistix are treating me well.

  8. #83
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    639
    Looks like both chips are sitting on a Taiwanese currency note and compared with Singapore coins....
    | Intel Core i5 2500K | Asrock P67 Extreme 6 | Gskill Ripjaws 8GB CL7 |

    | Sapphire HD6970 | Creative X-Fi modded | Corsair HX850 | Corsair H60 |



  9. #84
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Polizei View Post
    Well, the 45nm/P45 question was to the other poster... I'm in the same boat. Don't know if I should jump on a 45nm dual or quad now and get P45, or just wait it out until Nehalem/X58.

    45nm quad and P45 sounds like a better idea because I would need to get new RAM with the X58. My D9GMH Ballistix are treating me well.
    I went with getting the 8400 and a cheap P35 and will then hold out for Nehalem!
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  10. #85
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    That was another thought of mine... a friend just picked up a week old P5K Deluxe WIFI for $75, so he might sell me his IP35-E for cheap. E8400 to play with until Nehalem is a thought too... probably the cheapest route.

  11. #86
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    330
    so skt 775 is slowly dissapearing ??, there are going to be 3 new sockts, awsome !
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak View Post
    High end videocards are like hot girls.

    your never gonna pick the fat girl with the nice personality over the smoking hot 10.






    E8400
    DFI X38
    ATI 4870 X2
    8 Gb GSkill
    2x 36 Gb Raptor RAID 0
    750 Gb WD
    CPU, NB Water Cooled

  12. #87
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,546
    Hmm, Intel is finally getting rid of the god forsaken front side bus.

    It's about time.

  13. #88
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Polizei View Post
    I could've sworn there was either a P43 or a P53 coming out though... Either that, or I was hallucinating when I read an article... Hmm...
    You did. It is a cut down version of P45 supporting only 1 PCIe 16x slot, no other PCIe slot (at least those accepting a graphics card). Not sure if anything else is lost...

  14. #89
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Morais View Post
    55W for a mobile cpu.Isnt it too much?
    55W is the peak, eg. "extreme". But yes, its is higher than the 44W today.

    The usual john doe laptop will be 35W TDP just as today.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  15. #90
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    55W is the peak, eg. "extreme". But yes, its is higher than the 44W today.

    The usual john doe laptop will be 35W TDP just as today.
    yup, i dont think 55W is much for a quadcore, thought i dont know where i would need a quad in notebook.

  16. #91
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    And remember the mobile TDP is with a GPU aswell.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  17. #92
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    yup, i dont think 55W is much for a quadcore, thought i dont know where i would need a quad in notebook.
    Low voltage Xeons @ 2.5ghz have 50w TDP (of course w/out memory controller). I thought that for mobile they will do a bit better, but 55W isn't really bad.

  18. #93
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia! :)
    Posts
    6,096
    Quote Originally Posted by 003 View Post
    No, the SATA2 interface supports up to 300 MB/s of bandwidth, the fastest SSD read/write speeds are just approaching 100MB/s. Samsung has also announced a drive with 200MB/s and 256GB for next year.

    What I want to know, is there going to be an LGA755 version of Nehalem that will work with DDR2 boards?
    corrected
    DNA = Design Not Accident
    DNA = Darwin Not Accurate

    heatware / ebay
    HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
    https://prism-break.org/

  19. #94
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    534
    Even if NVIDIA fails to make a QPI chipset, MoBo makers can add SLI support by putting a nForce 200 on the boards, like on the skulltrail.
    The same for Lynnfield.

  20. #95
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by xVeinx View Post
    You did. It is a cut down version of P45 supporting only 1 PCIe 16x slot, no other PCIe slot (at least those accepting a graphics card). Not sure if anything else is lost...
    That $77 Foxconn supports 16x/4X dual slots. Newegg has it for;

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813186119

    Picky with RAM but runs with my 4GB of Muskin. The only Problem I've seen is Deep Sleep/S3, will not wake up properly. WIll wake from stand by $74 after rebate.

    Absolutely perfect cheap board is the Gigabyte DS3L in my ohter rig.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  21. #96
    Kin Hell
    Guest
    If the boffins get this right, these onboard Memory Controlled CPU's should kick some serious friggin Ass with numbers!

    Hold on to your Lock-Nuts RE prices!! ........ Fat wallets will probably be required, but wtf eh!

  22. #97
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Kin Hell View Post
    If the boffins get this right, these onboard Memory Controlled CPU's should kick some serious friggin Ass with numbers!

    Hold on to your Lock-Nuts RE prices!! ........ Fat wallets will probably be required, but wtf eh!
    Why the WTF? Look at what AMD did with X2 right out the gate? At least Intel held off raping us for two years Also, it's not like Penryn sucks
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  23. #98
    Kin Hell
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    Why the WTF? Look at what AMD did with X2 right out the gate? At least Intel held off raping us for two years Also, it's not like Penryn sucks
    Dunno what the knock on effect will be with Nehalem on pricing. With so many new CPU features, I guess Intel will be able to throttle the marketing accordingly & the more Juicy CPU`s will be fetching some pretty hefty prices. Top end Intel CPU`s have already seen £1000.00 GBP at launch, so I don`t figure your idea of Intel holding off from raping us in the last 2 years kinda works here. It`s much the same as nVidia Raping the industry over SLI. nVidia got too big for their boots & Intel have made them suffer for the last 2 years over it.

    Thing is with the Nehalem architecture, the speed difference your rig will see for it should be massive. It should blow even the most ardent Hardware gurus clean out of the zone & whilst Penryn doesn`t suck, it`s not yet sat in Nehalem's shadow. Fatten your wallet & get ready for WTF!

  24. #99
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Kin Hell View Post
    Dunno what the knock on effect will be with Nehalem on pricing. With so many new CPU features, I guess Intel will be able to throttle the marketing accordingly & the more Juicy CPU`s will be fetching some pretty hefty prices. Top end Intel CPU`s have already seen £1000.00 GBP at launch, so I don`t figure your idea of Intel holding off from raping us in the last 2 years kinda works here. It`s much the same as nVidia Raping the industry over SLI. nVidia got too big for their boots & Intel have made them suffer for the last 2 years over it.

    Thing is with the Nehalem architecture, the speed difference your rig will see for it should be massive. It should blow even the most ardent Hardware gurus clean out of the zone & whilst Penryn doesn`t suck, it`s not yet sat in Nehalem's shadow. Fatten your wallet & get ready for WTF!
    Very few folks on this forum care about AMD's or Intel top or high end models. The low to mid-range ones are more like to have more overclocking room so those are the most sought after models. That's something some folks tried to explain to at least one other poster here. Buying $1000 processors of any kind of defeats one of the main reason for overclocking, getting more for less Each new launch, buyers are looking for the Northwood 2.6C, Opteron 165, E6600, Q6600, E8400 and fill in the blank for Phenoms. Hell, look around the forum?

    The WTF is for who is surprised by Intel wanting more for Nehalem? Without competition, should prices on the lower end models stay low forever? Very few here care anything about the top two or even 3 models. Most of the time, Intel has a much wider range of products so there is no pressure most of the time to buy the High end models. The only question is how long after the Money making high end processors will folks have to wait for the mid-ranged models that most folks buy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  25. #100
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    Very few folks on this forum care about AMD's or Intel top or high end models. The low to mid-range ones are more like to have more overclocking room so those are the most sought after models. That's something some folks tried to explain to at least one other poster here. Buying $1000 processors of any kind of defeats one of the main reason for overclocking, getting more for less Each new launch, buyers are looking for the Northwood 2.6C, Opteron 165, E6600, Q6600, E8400 and fill in the blank for Phenoms. Hell, look around the forum?

    The WTF is for who is surprised by Intel wanting more for Nehalem? Without competition, should prices on the lower end models stay low forever? Very few here care anything about the top two or even 3 models. Most of the time, Intel has a much wider range of products so there is no pressure most of the time to buy the High end models. The only question is how long after the Money making high end processors will folks have to wait for the mid-ranged models that most folks buy.
    Actually I disagree here. Just as you saw all the top benchmarks on the SkullTrail systems done with QX9775's I am interested in the top numbers I can get and to do that I need the top end cpu's
    On the dual boards there is no way a 5420 with it's 7.5 multi will do what a X5460 will do with it's 9.5 multi.
    Possibly 3375 with the 5420's but very possible to do 4275 with he same numbers with the X5460's..
    Yea, you pay more but thats an additional 900mhz per core and there are 8 of them for an additional 7200mhz.
    Besides, an 8 core machine at over 4000mhz is pure epeen..
    I just had a 8 core X5482 Harpertown setup up to 3600 on air and God's truth, you wouldn't beleive the power in that bastage..
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •