Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
dude no way g92b will be 20+% faster than g92, its just not going to happen. G92b is a direct shrink, look at the r600 to 3870, did you see any big ipc gains? Samething will happen with g92 to g92b, it'll drive down prices and costs+up yields, but it won't do much for performance. You'd need it clocked at something like 800+mhz stock for it be 20% faster than g92 and that you know as well as everyone else that won't happen unless nvidia plans on having low yields again
I'm not firing up my calculator, but let's say that G92b will arrive clocked at ( I'm not saying things that originate from any source, this is pure speculation, not even well thought )

Core 800MHz
SPs 1998MHz
Mem GDDR5-3200

Which is feasible considering that a 65nm 8800GT/8800GTS512/9800GTX can run those clocks ( 780 to 800MHz core depending on your luck ) ( except the RAM obviously ) with a decent air cooler ( HR03-GT ).

There's also a chance ( not that much, but still possible ) that nVIDIA has touted the SPs and the MUL is working "properly" on G92b ( it didn't work most of the time on G8x/G92/G94 ), which results in even better numbers.

We just have to wait a tad to find out ( for the info, the card won't be out before August more than likely )