Page 54 of 117 FirstFirst ... 4445152535455565764104 ... LastLast
Results 1,326 to 1,350 of 2905

Thread: **Official DFI LanParty UT X48-T2R(and LT) Discussion

  1. #1326
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony View Post
    you need the new bios which should be up soon, Oskar tuned the board to help overclocking PSC IC's like the ones we use on the 1066 reapers you quoted there.

    I will try to post guides for these and the 1150 flex2 over at the ocz forum to help those looking for settings...BUT remember, im not interested in CPU overclocking so those who moan that they can not hit the CPU clocks with the ram where they want it will be asked to test with CPU's (quads especially) at near stock speeds due to the nature of the chipset.
    I got my Flex II yesterday and so far they are working great with LT X38 and current BIOS (03/14). I'm very happy with it.

    DDR2-1168 was the max stable clock I could achieve:


    Although the screen shows tRD 8 it's 7, only one phase is running at 8.
    My CPU does not like FSB higher than 460, so I'm a bit limited on dividers.

    Memory settings used:
    DRAM Timing
    - Enhance Data transmitting: Normal
    - Enhance Addressing: Normal
    - T2 Dispatch: Enabled

    Clock Setting Fine Delay
    Ch1 Clock Crossing Setting: More Relaxed
    - DIMM 1 Clock fine delay: Current
    - DIMM 2 Clock fine delay: Current
    - Ch 1 Command fine delay: Current
    - Ch 1 Control fine delay: Current

    Ch2 Clock Crossing Setting: More Relaxed
    - DIMM 3 Clock fine delay: Current
    - DIMM 4 Clock fine delay: Current
    - Ch 2 Command fine delay: Current
    - Ch 2 Control fine delay: Current

    Ch1Ch2 CommonClock Setting: More Relaxed

    Ch1 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch1 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch1 Command to CS Delay: Auto

    Ch2 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch2 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch2 Command to CS Delay: Auto (where cpuz sees 1T or 2T SETTING)

    CAS Latency Time (tCL):5
    RAS# to CAS# Delay (tRCD):5
    RAS# Precharge (tRP):5
    Precharge Delay (tRAS):15
    All Precharge to Act: 6
    REF to ACT Delay (tRFC): 54
    Performance LVL (Read Delay) (tRD): 8

    Read delay phase adjust: Enter

    Ch1 Read delay phase (4~0)
    - Channel 1 Phase 0 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 1 Phase 1 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 1 Phase 2 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 1 Phase 3 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 1 Phase 4 Pull-In: Enabled

    Ch2 Read delay phase (4~0)
    - Channel 2 Phase 0 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 2 Phase 1 Pull-In: Auto
    - Channel 2 Phase 2 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 2 Phase 3 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 2 Phase 4 Pull-In: Enabled

    MCH ODT Latency: AUTO
    Write to PRE Delay (tWR): 14
    Rank Write to Read (tWTR): 11
    ACT to ACT Delay (tRRD): 3
    Read to Write Delay (tRDWR): 8
    Ranks Write to Write (tWRWR): 6
    Ranks Read to Read (tRDRD): 6
    Ranks Write to Read (tWRRD): 5
    Read CAS# Precharge (tRTP): 3
    ALL PRE to Refresh: 6
    This could get my new 24/7 setting:


    // Edit

    I have been able to reduce tRD to 6, so performance improved a bit.



    FSB266 and 266/1066 divider or FSB333 and 333/1066 divider did not cause any issues to me. DDR2-1200 was no go with current BIOS, I could get it nearly stable at DDR2-1192. Do you have any news on the new BIOS files with PSC IC optimizations?
    Last edited by merlin76; 05-26-2008 at 01:59 AM.
    Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2, ASUS P8Z77 WS, Kingston KHX16C9K2/16X, Zotac GTX 570 AMP!, SB X-Fi Titanium, AVerTV Hybrid Speedy PCI-E, Intel SSD 330 120GB, WD1500HLFS, WD7501AALS, Pioneer BDC-S02BK, Pioneer BDR-207DBK, Corsair HX1000W, Lian Li PC-A79B (noise insulated), 6x Noctua NF-S12A FLX, Corsair H100i, Corsair K70, Razer DeathAdder, Eizo S2431 WH-BK, Teufel Motiv 5

  2. #1327
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    77
    I'm seeing lots of numbers here, but has anyone formed any opinions yet on whether this board is better than the competition (say Gigabyte or Asus)? Or whether it's a good choice for a fast reliable overclock?

    Thanks.
    DFI Lanparty UT DFI Lanparty UT X48-T3RS, Rev AA1, BIOS: 10/15/08
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 @4005MHz (work in progress), Sunbeamtech Core-Contact-Freezer (Air!)
    4G OCZ Reaper HPC DDR3 1800 @400/1333 (work in progress)
    eVGA 7900 GT KO RoHS, Zalman VP900CU Cooling
    SilverStone Decathlon DA1000
    Areca RAID ARC-1220 Raid 5 -- 1.2 TB
    (+2 DVD Drives, a few odd SATA drives, and a Hauppauge TV Card)

  3. #1328
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    Quote Originally Posted by davidk21770 View Post
    I'm seeing lots of numbers here, but has anyone formed any opinions yet on whether this board is better than the competition (say Gigabyte or Asus)? Or whether it's a good choice for a fast reliable overclock?

    Thanks.
    hmm i say it was way better than the maximus formula and rampage that i had.. for ddr2.. .

  4. #1329
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    8
    Any word on next bios release, or is there a good site for beta releases?

    Thanks
    Xeon X3350 @3.65ghz
    DFI LP LT X48 T2R
    BFG 8800GTS G92 800/1900/2220
    4GB G.SKILL DDR2-1000
    Fortron Epsilon 700w

  5. #1330
    Pie assassin
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Where lights collide
    Posts
    2,275
    Quote Originally Posted by cstkl1 View Post
    hmm i say it was way better than the maximus formula and rampage that i had.. for ddr2.. .
    i could say the exact opposite, but only when referring to "fast" overclock. dfi motherboards definitely take time to set up to run... but once set up THEY ARE FAST AS HELL
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  6. #1331
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    869
    just joined the group.... cant wait to get it.. now i have a basically brand new x38 dfi going up for sale lol just couldnt resist trying this out..
    upgrading...cooler master cm690 case, corsair hx850, samsung 1tb x 3, optiarc burners x2, gskill 4gb ripjaws, working on the rest again

  7. #1332
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    5,693
    I think I'll be buying this board as soon as I save up the $$. Goodbye EVGA 680i, hello DFI..

    I might even take the time to fabricate some custom blocks for this one...

  8. #1333
    Dave's Mentor!
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    5,247
    you guys should be lookin hard @ the dfi ut p35 cause its way better lol
    only thing i see better on x38-48 is runing 4 sticks n crossfire
    unless they come with a nice bios to give same performance as the dfi p35 lol
    i went back to the x38 just to keep my p35 nice n fresh lol

    maximus IV extreme gtx580
    gigabut p67-ud7
    p67 sabertooth
    2500k+2600k
    antec 1200watt
    EVGA classified 760
    920 Batch# 3849B018 4.985ghz@1.52v gtx285 ftw sli
    OCZ3RPR1866LV6GK hypers
    dfi ut p35 rampage extreme
    gigabut p35c-ds3r bios suks
    gigabut x38-d6q dead thank god
    ballistix 8500 1240mhz@2.02v

  9. #1334
    Dave's Mentor!
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    5,247
    merlin use
    Enhance Data transmitting: fast
    - Enhance Addressing:fast

    n watch it fly

    maximus IV extreme gtx580
    gigabut p67-ud7
    p67 sabertooth
    2500k+2600k
    antec 1200watt
    EVGA classified 760
    920 Batch# 3849B018 4.985ghz@1.52v gtx285 ftw sli
    OCZ3RPR1866LV6GK hypers
    dfi ut p35 rampage extreme
    gigabut p35c-ds3r bios suks
    gigabut x38-d6q dead thank god
    ballistix 8500 1240mhz@2.02v

  10. #1335
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by zsamz_ View Post
    merlin use
    Enhance Data transmitting: fast
    - Enhance Addressing:fast [...]
    I don't see any difference in performance setting these options to "Fast". Most important seems setting "T2 Dispatch" to "Enabled" whenever possible. When it comes to 24/7 stability I noticed that setting these options to "Normal" improved stability a lot, at least with my old G.Skill HZ, and it did not cost performance. With BIOS versions prior than 1/11 I saw some improvements but now I don't.
    Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2, ASUS P8Z77 WS, Kingston KHX16C9K2/16X, Zotac GTX 570 AMP!, SB X-Fi Titanium, AVerTV Hybrid Speedy PCI-E, Intel SSD 330 120GB, WD1500HLFS, WD7501AALS, Pioneer BDC-S02BK, Pioneer BDR-207DBK, Corsair HX1000W, Lian Li PC-A79B (noise insulated), 6x Noctua NF-S12A FLX, Corsair H100i, Corsair K70, Razer DeathAdder, Eizo S2431 WH-BK, Teufel Motiv 5

  11. #1336
    Dave's Mentor!
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    5,247
    Quote Originally Posted by merlin76 View Post
    I don't see any difference in performance setting these options to "Fast". Most important seems setting "T2 Dispatch" to "Enabled" whenever possible. When it comes to 24/7 stability I noticed that setting these options to "Normal" improved stability a lot, at least with my old G.Skill HZ, and it did not cost performance. With BIOS versions prior than 1/11 I saw some improvements but now I don't.
    only bandwidth increase
    just turbo not stable for me

    maximus IV extreme gtx580
    gigabut p67-ud7
    p67 sabertooth
    2500k+2600k
    antec 1200watt
    EVGA classified 760
    920 Batch# 3849B018 4.985ghz@1.52v gtx285 ftw sli
    OCZ3RPR1866LV6GK hypers
    dfi ut p35 rampage extreme
    gigabut p35c-ds3r bios suks
    gigabut x38-d6q dead thank god
    ballistix 8500 1240mhz@2.02v

  12. #1337
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Potosi, Missouri
    Posts
    2,296
    Quote Originally Posted by merlin76 View Post
    I don't see any difference in performance setting these options to "Fast".
    After tRD, those two settings have the biggest influence on performance then any other setting.

  13. #1338
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by Praz View Post
    After tRD, those two settings have the biggest influence on performance then any other setting.
    450x8 266/667

    Identical settings for all tests:

    Code:
    Clock Setting Fine Delay
    Ch1 Clock Crossing Setting: More Relaxed
    - DIMM 1 Clock fine delay: Current
    - DIMM 2 Clock fine delay: Current
    - Ch 1 Command fine delay: Current
    - Ch 1 Control fine delay: Current
    
    Ch2 Clock Crossing Setting: More Relaxed
    - DIMM 3 Clock fine delay: Current
    - DIMM 4 Clock fine delay: Current
    - Ch 2 Command fine delay: Current
    - Ch 2 Control fine delay: Current
    
    Ch1Ch2 CommonClock Setting: More Relaxed
    
    Ch1 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch1 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch1 Command to CS Delay: Auto
    
    Ch2 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch2 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch2 Command to CS Delay: Auto (where cpuz sees 1T or 2T SETTING)
    
    CAS Latency Time (tCL):5
    RAS# to CAS# Delay (tRCD):5
    RAS# Precharge (tRP):5
    Precharge Delay (tRAS):15
    All Precharge to Act: 6
    REF to ACT Delay (tRFC): 54
    Performance LVL (Read Delay) (tRD): 7
    
    Read delay phase adjust: Enter
    
    Ch1 Read delay phase (4~0)
    - Channel 1 Phase 0 Pull-In: AUTO
    - Channel 1 Phase 1 Pull-In: AUTO
    - Channel 1 Phase 2 Pull-In: AUTO
    - Channel 1 Phase 3 Pull-In: AUTO
    - Channel 1 Phase 4 Pull-In: AUTO
    
    Ch2 Read delay phase (4~0)
    - Channel 2 Phase 0 Pull-In: AUTO
    - Channel 2 Phase 1 Pull-In: AUTO
    - Channel 2 Phase 2 Pull-In: AUTO
    - Channel 2 Phase 3 Pull-In: AUTO
    - Channel 2 Phase 4 Pull-In: AUTO
    
    MCH ODT Latency: 1
    Write to PRE Delay (tWR): 14
    Rank Write to Read (tWTR): 11
    ACT to ACT Delay (tRRD): 3
    Read to Write Delay (tRDWR): 8
    Ranks Write to Write (tWRWR): 6
    Ranks Read to Read (tRDRD): 6
    Ranks Write to Read (tWRRD): 5
    Read CAS# Precharge (tRTP): 3
    ALL PRE to Refresh: 6
    Enhance Data transmitting: Normal
    Enhance Addressing: Normal
    T2 Dispatch: Enabled



    Enhance Data transmitting: Normal
    Enhance Addressing: Normal
    T2 Dispatch: Disabled



    Enhance Data transmitting: Fast
    Enhance Addressing: Fast
    T2 Dispatch: Enabled



    Enhance Data transmitting: Fast
    Enhance Addressing: Fast
    T2 Dispatch: Disabled
    Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2, ASUS P8Z77 WS, Kingston KHX16C9K2/16X, Zotac GTX 570 AMP!, SB X-Fi Titanium, AVerTV Hybrid Speedy PCI-E, Intel SSD 330 120GB, WD1500HLFS, WD7501AALS, Pioneer BDC-S02BK, Pioneer BDR-207DBK, Corsair HX1000W, Lian Li PC-A79B (noise insulated), 6x Noctua NF-S12A FLX, Corsair H100i, Corsair K70, Razer DeathAdder, Eizo S2431 WH-BK, Teufel Motiv 5

  14. #1339
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Potosi, Missouri
    Posts
    2,296
    Don't know what the problem is there. There should be several hundred MB/s difference in Read and a difference in Latency depending on how the Enhanced settings are configured.
    Last edited by Praz; 05-24-2008 at 04:35 AM.

  15. #1340
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    89
    With BIOS versions prior 1/11 I saw differences in bandwith and latency, with 1/11 and 3/14 it does not seem to matter anymore. I don't know, either.
    Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2, ASUS P8Z77 WS, Kingston KHX16C9K2/16X, Zotac GTX 570 AMP!, SB X-Fi Titanium, AVerTV Hybrid Speedy PCI-E, Intel SSD 330 120GB, WD1500HLFS, WD7501AALS, Pioneer BDC-S02BK, Pioneer BDR-207DBK, Corsair HX1000W, Lian Li PC-A79B (noise insulated), 6x Noctua NF-S12A FLX, Corsair H100i, Corsair K70, Razer DeathAdder, Eizo S2431 WH-BK, Teufel Motiv 5

  16. #1341
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Potosi, Missouri
    Posts
    2,296
    The only board I have set up at the moment is the UT x48. I'll check what it does. Might be able to point DFI to these posts and find out what's going on.

  17. #1342
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    89
    That's nice, thanks.
    Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2, ASUS P8Z77 WS, Kingston KHX16C9K2/16X, Zotac GTX 570 AMP!, SB X-Fi Titanium, AVerTV Hybrid Speedy PCI-E, Intel SSD 330 120GB, WD1500HLFS, WD7501AALS, Pioneer BDC-S02BK, Pioneer BDR-207DBK, Corsair HX1000W, Lian Li PC-A79B (noise insulated), 6x Noctua NF-S12A FLX, Corsair H100i, Corsair K70, Razer DeathAdder, Eizo S2431 WH-BK, Teufel Motiv 5

  18. #1343
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    5,693
    I went ahead and made my order for this board a few minutes ago..

    This review was convincing enough for me..

    http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/revie...ng-review.html


  19. #1344
    Pie assassin
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Where lights collide
    Posts
    2,275
    after spending a week figuring out this mobo, and tweaking it out. ive come to 2 conclusion. #1 latency on dfi is approx 2ns slower than my asus, and read bandwidth is about 100/mb less however ive been able to run @ the same speed before w/ lower overall volts and my read + write are about 200mb faster. perhaps i have more tweaking to do but im at a kind of a stand still atm. dont know where else i can get a bit more performance from other than more fsb or cpu freq.

    i wil post up my full settings w/ bandwidth screen shots @ around 3pst. thanks in advance for any suggestions.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  20. #1345
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    841
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenEffect View Post
    after spending a week figuring out this mobo, and tweaking it out. ive come to 2 conclusion. #1 latency on dfi is approx 2ns slower than my asus, and read bandwidth is about 100/mb less however ive been able to run @ the same speed before w/ lower overall volts and my read + write are about 200mb faster. perhaps i have more tweaking to do but im at a kind of a stand still atm. dont know where else i can get a bit more performance from other than more fsb or cpu freq.

    i wil post up my full settings w/ bandwidth screen shots @ around 3pst. thanks in advance for any suggestions.
    I've noticed this as well. I have nothing left to tweak as far as memory goes and I'm a little slower on the bandwidth and latency. I experienced the same thing with the DFI 680i when comparing it to my P5K-D and EVGA 680i. I can also confirm that this board runs at much lower volts than my Formula Rampage conversion but wasn't that the point of the x48 chipset, the higher binned north bridge?

    I think my memory's holding me back at the moment. I couldn't run my 4x1GB Mushkin's on this board so now I am using 2x2GB OCZ Flex II's. For some reason I am having issues running the 400 strap @ 400MHz w/o losening my timmings too much.
    QX 9650 | Maximus II Formula | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) PC2 8500 | Sapphire 4850 X2 2GB| Auzen X-Fi Prelude 7.1 | 3x's WD 150GB Raptors & 2x's 1TB Seagate 7200.11 | Silverstone OP1200 | SilverStone TJ07 | Dell 2707WFP

    EK-RES 250 --> Swiftech MCP655 --> Apogee GTZ --> Enzotech Sapphire NB --> Feser X-Changer 360


  21. #1346
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1
    Hi, I just bought the UT mobo and I have some problem to run my ram at stock speed its a Gskill F2-8500CL5D-4GBPK, anyone who use this ram please can share the exact settings?

  22. #1347
    Pie assassin
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Where lights collide
    Posts
    2,275
    memset is still reading my tRTP values as 2 higher than set in bios. is this a known issue w/ the software?

    quick s/c @ 1200



    once again, slower than my asus... but still nothing to sneeze at.

    *edit*
    also, i can not just set +1.4v in bios as it crashes and i have to reset cmos, however i can set +1.4v in bios if i use the special vid section. is this something w/ the board i should be worried about?

    *edit edit*

    ok NOW we are getting somewhere. latency is still not as low as on the asus HOWEVER ive exceeded read, write, and copy bandwidth.



    apparently i left the pull ins on auto instead of enabling them to get pl7
    also tweaked tREF from stock 3120T to 14592T in memset. that netted me 200 more mb read and almost 2ns less latency. now to stability test it. i expect it to pass w/ flying colors as ive done so before w/ same settings. just re-checking at this point.. 2 hours orthos ram test and im calling it a day. this dfi is getting better and better every day
    Last edited by ZenEffect; 05-24-2008 at 02:47 PM.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  23. #1348
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    841
    Great job clocking your RAM Zen. Really impressed.

    memset is still reading my tRTP values as 2 higher than set in bios. is this a known issue w/ the software?
    I've got tRTP set to 3 in BIOS but MemSet 3.5 sees it as 5 as well. All other values are reported correctly.
    QX 9650 | Maximus II Formula | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) PC2 8500 | Sapphire 4850 X2 2GB| Auzen X-Fi Prelude 7.1 | 3x's WD 150GB Raptors & 2x's 1TB Seagate 7200.11 | Silverstone OP1200 | SilverStone TJ07 | Dell 2707WFP

    EK-RES 250 --> Swiftech MCP655 --> Apogee GTZ --> Enzotech Sapphire NB --> Feser X-Changer 360


  24. #1349
    Pie assassin
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Where lights collide
    Posts
    2,275
    Quote Originally Posted by TouGe View Post
    Great job clocking your RAM Zen. Really impressed.
    cost me $45 after rebate

    *edit*
    had to set trfc to 50 to stabilize it. apparently 46 is too tight


    here are my ram settings. the only thing i tweaked in memset was what i mentioned before.

    Code:
    DRAM Timing
    - Enhance Data transmitting: Fast
    - Enhance Addressing: Fast
    - T2 Dispatch: Enabled
    
    Clock Setting Fine Delay
    Ch1 Clock Crossing Setting: More Agressive
    - DIMM 1 Clock fine delay: Current
    - DIMM 2 Clock fine delay: Current
    - Ch 1 Command fine delay: Current
    - Ch 1 Control fine delay: Current
    
    Ch2 Clock Crossing Setting: More Agressive
    - DIMM 3 Clock fine delay: Current
    - DIMM 4 Clock fine delay: Current
    - Ch 2 Command fine delay: Current
    - Ch 2 Control fine delay: Current
    
    Ch1Ch2 CommonClock Setting: More Agressive
    
    Ch1 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch1 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch1 Command to CS Delay: Auto
    
    Ch2 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch2 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
    Ch2 Command to CS Delay: Auto (where cpuz sees 1T or 2T SETTING)
    
    CAS Latency Time (tCL):5
    RAS# to CAS# Delay (tRCD):5
    RAS# Precharge (tRP):5
    Precharge Delay (tRAS):18
    All Precharge to Act: 5
    REF to ACT Delay (tRFC): 50
    Performance LVL (Read Delay) (tRD):8
    
    Read delay phase adjust: Enter
    
    Ch1 Read delay phase (4~0)
    - Channel 1 Phase 0 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 1 Phase 1 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 1 Phase 2 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 1 Phase 3 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 1 Phase 4 Pull-In: Enabled
    Ch2 Read delay phase (4~0)
    - Channel 2 Phase 0 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 2 Phase 1 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 2 Phase 2 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 2 Phase 3 Pull-In: Enabled
    - Channel 2 Phase 4 Pull-In: Enabled
    
    MCH ODT Latency: 8
    Write to PRE Delay (tWR): 14
    Rank Write to Read (tWTR): 11
    ACT to ACT Delay (tRRD): 3
    Read to Write Delay (tRDWR): 8
    Ranks Write to Write (tWRWR): 5
    Ranks Read to Read (tRDRD): 5
    Ranks Write to Read (tWRRD): 8
    Read CAS# Precharge (tRTP): 3
    ALL PRE to Refresh: 3
    500fsb has a lot to do with my bandwidth atm
    Last edited by ZenEffect; 05-25-2008 at 10:37 AM.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  25. #1350
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK/East Sussex
    Posts
    355
    what are the available waterblocks for the PWM?
    I have been looking on some UK e-shops but I haven't found any

Page 54 of 117 FirstFirst ... 4445152535455565764104 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •