Originally Posted by jas420221 3.4-3.6 =Q6600 3.6-3.8+ = Q9450 Ill take a 200Mhz bump +10% clock for clock performance increase over the Q6600. thanks for the clarification. My horrible vid q6600 will indeed top out at 3.5-3.6 But I don't think I could justify 150$ more for 200-300mhz . Maybe when x-mas comes around with a new re visioned 45nm quad that can regularly do 4.0-4.2 on water.
Intel 2600K @ 4.8ghz 1.31v on Water. ASROCK Z68 Ex4 Gen 3, 16GB G.skill pc1600 MSI GTX 680 1200/6800mhz 2x Vertex LE 60GB Raid 0
Originally Posted by Unoid thanks for the clarification. My horrible vid q6600 will indeed top out at 3.5-3.6 But I don't think I could justify 150$ more for 200-300mhz . Maybe when x-mas comes around with a new re visioned 45nm quad that can regularly do 4.0-4.2 on water. They can do that on water. I was explicitly talking about air (but didnt mention it, figured that was a given) for both chips in my previous post. I have water on the way and am shooting for 4Ghz easily (I can bench 4Ghz now on air no probs).
View Tag Cloud
Forum Rules
Bookmarks