That doesn't mean its not necessary... we've seen cases where 256-bit hurts performance vs. 384-bit and 512-bit. It's not much of an obvious need-based trend when you're talking about each company needing to keep up with their competition in terms of costs for their products. If they choose to go the costlier route, they automatically lose out in a price cut war. No one wants that disadvantage, so they happened to match each others 256-bit specs last round because it was the logical thing to do (offer a value card).
This time it's two different costly approaches to increase back to 512-bit bandwidth levels. So much for any trend..





Bookmarks