I guess I just have to disagree with your interpretation. To me, the question I raised versus what he said was very cut and dry. He says one thing while reality shows another. His knowledge about a certain subject, where we might get to eventually, or our inability to maximize a Phenom's potential are largely irrelevant to the statement made. It is possible that he wasn't exaggerating at all either, if he genuinely hasn't seen how most (and I say that factually, not stereotypically) of us aren't achieving what is suggested by his statement. I guess I just don't see why an obvious exaggeration would be so readily defended by others who have seen the same data I have. :/