exactly. pressure buildup because it's closed loop
exactly. pressure buildup because it's closed loop
Blow off Valve! woot.![]()
e6420 @ 500x7 - 1.48v
Asus P5B DLX
2x1024mb GSkill HZ's @ 500 4-4-4-12 @ 2.25v
Asus 320mb 8800gts @ 675/985
ThermalTake Armor Black
OCZ 850w
If the metal won't boil then the chance of it leaking under pressure shouldn't be significant...
So a closed loop is not a problem.
Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.
Xtreme Network:
- Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
- Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
- Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
- Cisco 3502i Access Point
Does anyone here have experience with electromagnetic pumps?
what kind of head pressure can they accomplish.
E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
Intel's atom is a terrible chip.
The old Soviet Submarines used to use Lead Bismuth as coolant, not mercury![]()
Main Rig
Intel Core i7-2600K (SLB8W, E0 Stepping) @ 4.6Ghz (4.6x100), Corsair H80i AIO Cooler
MSI Z77A GD-65 Gaming (MS-7551), v25 BIOS
Kingston HyperX 16GB (2x8GB) PC3-19200 Kit (HX24C11BRK2/16-OC) @ 1.5v, 11-13-13-30 Timings (1:8 Ratio)
8GB MSI Radeon R9 390X (1080 Mhz Core, 6000 Mhz Memory)
NZXT H440 Case with NZXT Hue+ Installed
24" Dell U2412HM (1920x1200, e-IPS panel)
1 x 500GB Samsung 850 EVO (Boot & Install)
1 x 2Tb Hitachi 7K2000 in External Enclosure (Scratch Disk)
Entertainment Setup
Samsung Series 6 37" 1080p TV
Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H based media PC, Mini ITX Case, Blu-Ray Drive
Netgear ReadyNAS104 w/4x2TB Toshiba DTACA200's for 5.8TB Volume size
I refuse to participate in any debate with creationists because doing so would give them the "oxygen of respectability" that they want.
Creationists don't mind being beaten in an argument. What matters to them is that I give them recognition by bothering to argue with them in public.
In general when commercially speaking of liquid metal, it is zirconium-based alloy. Some example compositions are listed below, in atomic percent::
• An early alloy, Vitreloy 1:
Zr: 41.2 Be: 22.5 Ti: 13.8 Cu: 12.5 Ni: 10
• A variant, Vitreloy 4, or Vit4:
Zr: 46.75 Be: 27.5 Ti: 8.25 Cu: 7.5 Ni: 10
• Vitreloey 105, or Vit105:
Zr: 52.5 Ti: 5 Cu: 17.9 Ni: 14.6 Al:10
• A more recent development (Vitreloy 106a), which forms glass under less rapid cooling:
Zr: 58.5 Cu: 15.6 Ni: 12.8 Al: 10.3 Nb: 2.8
(source: Wiki lol)![]()
Repetition of this is getting annoying.
We know that, but if the heat it conducted away from the hot spot and then dissipated with greater efficiency through a well designed radiator, then in this case liquid metal > water cooling.
I'm guessing with something like this that a high flow, with a large radiator, would work.
Last edited by cegras; 04-24-2008 at 06:20 AM.
E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
Intel's atom is a terrible chip.
I think the point of using liquid metal as a coolant, is that you can have a non mechanical pump that is both small and powerful enough that doesn't use much power that it could be reasonably used in a standard heat sink.
Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.
Xtreme Network:
- Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
- Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
- Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
- Cisco 3502i Access Point
this has been tried several times already, id be surprised if they can get it to work but... good luck. iirc its a highly hazzardous metal mix and didnt really work well at all...
i've been reading up on this specific type of pump, it runs a current through the "liquid metal". thats going to heat up the working fluid and kind of work against itself. i'm sure the resistivity of the "liquid metal" is much higher than that of copper
"this specific type of pump"? The website for "Danamics" is maybe the most vague, vaporware-looking thing we've seen in a good while, not once mentioning anything about their "technology"... and you know what kind of pump they're using in a "revolutionary" system?
Not trying to harp on you or anything, I just want to remind people that what we know of this product is:
1. Nothing
2. It will have to be expensive
3. It likely won't work very well
Even NanoCoolers, the US company that designs stuff like this, publicly said awhile ago that liquid metal cooling is only about 5% better than water cooling and 30% better than air... while costing many, many times more. That's why they haven't brought anything to the consumer market.
Now, let's let this vaporware thread die.
Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.
Xtreme Network:
- Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
- Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
- Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
- Cisco 3502i Access Point
heat capacity does not matter, what you want is heat conductivity
@1.5watts Lorentz-Force pumps can move about 20grams of fluid @ a 1psi pressure differential a second (this is from nanoclooers data), that translates to about 3 milliliters a second of flow rate. To use this kind of pump for anything xtreme, its going to have to be upscaled, thus there will be a need for a bigger EM pump which equals more current and more heat.
what i don't understand is why no one has tried using a fluid with greater heat conductivity in a normal water loop.
a) I highly doubt heat dump from a current running through the liquid metal will be significant.
b) A fluid with great heat conductivity is probably more volatile. Not so the case with liquid metals, which have a huge difference between melting and vaporizing points.
E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
Intel's atom is a terrible chip.
If the metal is liquid, it does not matter that much how well it conducts. Even if it were to conduct as well as copper, thats still pretty slow. (Have you ever held a copper bar on one end and heated the other?)
Having a higher heat capacity is better, because then it takes a lot more heat energy to heat up the water per degree, which is what you want in a waterblock.
The only reason i can think of for using liquid metal is to use a magnetic pump, so they don't have to rely on moving parts
You can drink a glasss of mercury without any adverse effects, too, as long as you don't do it standing upright (it might punch a hole through your digestive tract somewhere). You can't digest it anyway.
Mercury Oxide absorbed through the lungs is how Mercury can enter the blood stream
Edit: Also, I saw some articles on something similar about a year ago, except for video cards. Didn't Sapphire end up implementing it in some of their high end cards too?
Last edited by iddqd; 04-26-2008 at 08:26 PM.
Sigs are obnoxious.
*invests in Danamics*
![]()
Bookmarks