-
keithlm: Only people that have a bias would accept benchmarks results blindly without considering any other aspect of the system. (Or even consider what each benchmark is actually doing.)
I remember a thread on another forum where somebody basically was telling me I was an idiot for not blindly accepting the results of the benchmarks based on JUST the number of "wins" versus the number of "losses". (And yes... some of the results were within a percent or two.)That's one of the reasons I signed up on this forum:smile:
Rammsteiner: And as I never owned an Intel system, I cant really say anything about the 'smoothness' in usage, but I heard a lot AMD is running smoother from people who do own them both. But I dont use that comment as long as I dont experience that my self. I have, well at least the P4 v. Athlon Series, in my opinion AMD tends clock lower but really move. I've never owned a an intel quad but I've had 3 intel core 2 laptops and my current amd lappy wips them without a dedicated video card (I don't game on laptops, of course) I will never say this cpu is empirically better over that one beacause of all the variables that go into setups, I will however say that I prefer one cpu over another. I will also put on the record that I am not against building Intel, I just don't really want to nor do I have the resources to outfit 2 builds of higher end parts. Sorry for the confusing post I couldn't the multi-quote to work.
Last edited by stocius; 04-19-2008 at 12:31 PM.
Reason: Clarity
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks