Page 8 of 22 FirstFirst ... 56789101118 ... LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 545

Thread: X3350 Arrival

  1. #176
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL USA
    Posts
    582
    @RunAway

    Thanx for the Info. Tomorrow, Wed, 4/2/08 both my Q9450 and X3350 will arrive. I'll have to wait til the weakend to play with them in my Asus Maximus Formula though. Also my RMA'd ASus P5N-T Dlx arrives tomorrow after being sent out on 3/3/08. Also ordered a Q6700 Retail from Clubit this morning for $299. They keep lowerirng the price from $539 to $299 and then back to $539 every day now. The $299 price is only available for 1 hour every day and that hour is Random.

    I know the Q6700 is suppose to drop to $266 on 4/24/08, but what's $30.

    I just want to see if I can hit 4.0GHz with it since it has a 10x Multi and the Q6600, which I own has a 9x multi. If my Q6600 can run at 422x9 for 3.8GHz, I cannot see why 4.1 is not attainable with a Q6700 (410 x 10).

    My Lapped Zalman CNPS9700NT kicks butt at cooling CPUs.

  2. #177
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    Good luck with your chips, then. And I'm awaiting some great results. So far, it seems there are very few golden chips, and maybe... I'm lucky to have one.
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  3. #178
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    C:\Philippines\TPC
    Posts
    1,525
    guys, any info on what FPO/Batch# & Pack dates you have that are OCing well?

  4. #179
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    Mine is L803B196, and the chip is hitting 3.80GHz like nothing. I've provided way too much information regarding that in this thread, too. I'm currently stress testing 3.90GHz.
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  5. #180
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    C:\Philippines\TPC
    Posts
    1,525
    Congrats Runaway seems that chip/batch has been doing great so far

  6. #181
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    Thanks. It's almost there. Half an hour... and maybe I'll keep 3.90GHz. It requires only 1.35v up until this point... and probably even lower!
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  7. #182
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Kensek View Post
    My Lapped Zalman CNPS9700NT kicks butt at cooling CPUs.
    What temps do you get with ya current setup... I really haven't had any good succes with those Zalman coolers , too noisy to be performant. Pretty sure this cooler cannot handle 4ghz at 1.5volts with a q6700... Secondly it has got nothing to do with the multiplier to get too 4ghz... this is CPU design dependant... Most Q6700 are topping out at the same 3.7-3.9 levels as many Q6600 with air cooling...

    But I hope that I'm totally wrong and you can get 4ghz at decent voltage levels and with good temps.... Keep us posted...
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  8. #183
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL USA
    Posts
    582
    Well my OEM Q9450 arrived today. So I did pull out my Q6600 that can do 3.9 GHz and installed the Q9450. I could only get it to hit 440x8.

    450x8 at any CPU, NB, FSB vtt, CPU pll, would not get the Load Windows XP screen to finish saying Loading your Settings. Very Disappointing!!!

    Maybe my Maximus Board sucks. I tried a QX9650 5 weeks ago and it couldn't even do 400x10. It would Max out at 3.92GHz at 342*11.5. Just slighly better than my Q6600.

  9. #184
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    I'm starting to smell... motherboard limits? Gosh, if only I COULD have a Q9450 to try out.
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  10. #185
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    C:\Philippines\TPC
    Posts
    1,525
    @Kensek: what FPO/Batch#?

  11. #186
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Kensek View Post
    Well my OEM Q9450 arrived today. So I did pull out my Q6600 that can do 3.9 GHz and installed the Q9450. I could only get it to hit 440x8.

    450x8 at any CPU, NB, FSB vtt, CPU pll, would not get the Load Windows XP screen to finish saying Loading your Settings. Very Disappointing!!!

    Maybe my Maximus Board sucks. I tried a QX9650 5 weeks ago and it couldn't even do 400x10. It would Max out at 3.92GHz at 342*11.5. Just slighly better than my Q6600.
    Either you got a dud board, using wrong bios or have bad settings...
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  12. #187
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL USA
    Posts
    582
    My OEM Q9450 is from Batch L803A549. That's all the info written on the CPU

  13. #188
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL USA
    Posts
    582
    Well I ordered an Asus Rampage (X48 chipset) today to see if that will help in getting my Q9450 and X3350 to run at 3.80GHz. I'll get it sometime next week though.

    But I'll have this weekend to play with the X3350 and Q6700 within the Maximus Formula.

  14. #189
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    Hmm... I wish I had another chip to try out on my motherboard... to see if it's really a motherboard thing. But hey, seeing as to how a P5K modded to death could achieve 519, I guess it's not a motherboard thing.
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  15. #190
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    10009
    Posts
    3,628
    is it just me or is it really hard to get past 475 fsb. I tried p35 and x38 and both stop around 475. I could try sub zero cooling but I dont know if it would even make a difference.

  16. #191
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    415
    It's driving me nuts: I can't boot past 445MHz no matter what crazy voltage I set. Tried 907, 1004 and now the Rampage BIOS but nothing helps.
    This very board board was flying at 470-480 with my previous G0 - what the hell is this? Any idea, guys?
    TIA

  17. #192
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Western NY
    Posts
    764
    So far most of these chips present a real challange to get beyond 480 or so. No matter what board, voltages, etc. I have seen some good numbers under dice but most don't play that game.
    ASUS P8P67 Pro Rev3; Intel 2600K; GSkill Ripjaws 1600 (2x4GB); XFX 5870; WD Black 500G x2 Raid0; Silverstone Striker 750W; SwiftechApogee-XT-TC PA120.3-Swiftech MP655; Lian Li G70B; Win7-64

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The clueless don't even know they are.

    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. -- Einstein

    HEAT

  18. #193
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,461
    Quote Originally Posted by T2k View Post
    It's driving me nuts: I can't boot past 445MHz no matter what crazy voltage I set. Tried 907, 1004 and now the Rampage BIOS but nothing helps.
    This very board board was flying at 470-480 with my previous G0 - what the hell is this? Any idea, guys?
    TIA
    Memory dividers? Just throwing things out there.
    1.7%

  19. #194
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    10009
    Posts
    3,628
    Quote Originally Posted by sofarfrome View Post
    So far most of these chips present a real challange to get beyond 480 or so. No matter what board, voltages, etc. I have seen some good numbers under dice but most don't play that game.
    Where are the dice results you are referring to? I had mine on the p5e3 and dice last night but after -35c the board got caught in a loop during post. it would just shut off and restart over and over by itself? Condensation or cold bug? I took the container off and once board got back to ambient temps. I put a stock intel heatsink on and it would post fine. I think I need to reevaluate my insulation methods.
    Last edited by trans am; 04-11-2008 at 08:10 AM.

  20. #195
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    48
    I just ordered my 3350 from newegg! Order was successfully charged but since i just ordered 20 mins ago it hasn't shipped yet Probly get it next tuesday...
    Core i7 2600k @4.8ghz
    Asus Maximus V Gene
    4x4gig Corsair DDR3-1600
    xfx 5870 under mcw-60 and vrm-4
    Corsair 120gig Force 3 GT & 500gig WD SE16
    Seasonic X-750
    Silverstone FT02-BW
    Apogee HD, 2x 240mm rads, mcp-655 pump, 4x GT's
    Samsung 215TW

  21. #196
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    Just confirmed by myself: there's no limit to the FSB you can get from Q9450/X3350 CPUs. There's only a limit to your board.
    And IMO, best board to get for Q9450/X3350 processors right now is... ASUS P5E-VM HDMI, as I've gotten both a Q9450 and a X3350 to over 475 FSB (X3350 to 520, Q9450 to 512 booting) on two P5E-VM HDMI boards.

    What's next? I guess we'll have to wait and see.

    Edit: 475 is possible even with the onboard graphics adapter. Guess that means SFF extreme quads for us.
    Last edited by RunawayPrisoner; 04-11-2008 at 12:06 PM.
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  22. #197
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by RunawayPrisoner View Post
    Edit: 475 is possible even with the onboard graphics adapter. Guess that means SFF extreme quads for us.
    Are you serious? You used the onboard graphics, and still got 475FSB?

  23. #198
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedMoMegaHurtZ View Post
    Are you serious? You used the onboard graphics, and still got 475FSB?
    Yeap. Actually, I could even boot at 512 with the onboard graphics adapter. Will make a video of that later... once I have set everything up.
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  24. #199
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    Never mind 475 with onboard GPU.
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  25. #200
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL USA
    Posts
    582

    Follow Up

    Well The X3350 is in the New Rampage Formula and it can only do 462x8.

    And that is at 1.25v. More CPU volts don't do anything in hopes of going higher. The NB is at 1.63v from a FSB of 400 to 462. Maybe that needs to go to 1.80v?

    FSB vtt is 1.45v
    CPUpll is 1.55v.

    What else can I try to get 475x8 on a X3350?



    At least it is a little better than the Q9450 in the Maximus Formula which could only do 445x8.

    These 45nm Quads do not offer anything more than an Old Q6600 G0 SLACR.

    And actually my Q6600 runs faster than an X3350.

    Q6600 can do 428x9
    X3350 can do 462x8

    Also my Q6700 couldn't do 400x10, only 360x10.

    Don't think I'll ever get to 4.0GHz with a Quad Core on Air.
    My Old QX9650 could only do 345x11.5.

Page 8 of 22 FirstFirst ... 56789101118 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •