1. I made it clear I was impressed with the app and unclewebb's work and I've actually recommended this app previously in other threads here, so I've got nothing to prove about my intentions in posting what I did. I'm not responsible for people misinterpreting my words, whether accidentally or wilfully.
2. The comment I made was about a specific change to the interface that was going to make it much harder for people to use, and I have justified my opinion with some general comments about UI design, something I know a little more about than most here, I'd guess. I build Windows apps and PHP websites that rely on clear interfaces and good design to make them easily accessible as well as functional.
3. My only interest is in helping improve the app so that it requires less support from unclewebb and is easier to use, which obviously benefits all users, not just me. Anyone who suggests I have an ego problem in making a constructive comment like that is simply an idiot.
4. unclewebb has already accepted my constructive criticism in the spirit in which it was intended, as a helpful comment from one app author to another. Anyone else's opinion on the matter is frankly irrelevant.
5. You've gotta laugh. The "ego" poster is the one with 1000s of posts to his name merely celebrating new releases of app software with better features and/or design - yet he flames (lamely) someone who is trying to help improve THIS software, implying improvements aren't important. What a du... well, I don't have to say it.![]()
Any further comments or suggestions I make will be in private. Unlike some people here, I can actually contribute practically to this project in ways that would benefit everyone, as unclewebb is aware, but funnily enough my ego doesn't need the credit for that.![]()





Reply With Quote


Bookmarks