View Poll Results: Do you consider your intel 45nm CPU (wolfdale E8x00) to be Degraded

Voters
280. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, after supplying 1.300v - 1.349v to the vcore

    12 4.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.350v - 1.399v to the vcore

    14 5.00%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.400v - 1.449v to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.450v - 1.499v to the vcore

    23 8.21%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.500v - 1.599v to the vcore

    15 5.36%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.600v or more to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.300v - 1.349v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.350v - 1.399v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.400v - 1.449v 24/7

    33 11.79%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.450v or more 24/7

    33 11.79%
Results 1 to 25 of 403

Thread: E8400/8500 degradation myth possibly busted?

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    14
    I'm still having the same situation I stated earlier in the thread. My 2nd core (never the 1st) fails at 1hr 18-22 mins every single time I prime. Same clock and voltage ran for 15hrs+ originally. One voltage notch up and it primes for 17+ hrs. What would cause it to fail at the exact same spot every time? Seems odd that only one voltage notch up would cause it to go for an extra 16+ hrs.
    Last edited by MosIncredible; 04-08-2008 at 02:23 PM.
    CPU: Q6600 @ 3.4GHz [425x8] (1.248v CPU-Z Load) L741A963 / VID=1.2125
    HSF: Zalman 9700
    MB: DFI DK P35-T2RS
    GPU: XFX 8800GTS (G92) 512MB @ 800/1970/1100
    RAM:
    2GB OCZ Reaper (PC2 6400) 850 [4-4-4-12]
    HDD: WD 500GB 16MB
    Case: Antec 900
    PSU: OCZ 700W
    Monitor: LG 22" L226WTQ

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •