MMM

View Poll Results: Do you consider your intel 45nm CPU (wolfdale E8x00) to be Degraded

Voters
280. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, after supplying 1.300v - 1.349v to the vcore

    12 4.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.350v - 1.399v to the vcore

    14 5.00%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.400v - 1.449v to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.450v - 1.499v to the vcore

    23 8.21%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.500v - 1.599v to the vcore

    15 5.36%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.600v or more to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.300v - 1.349v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.350v - 1.399v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.400v - 1.449v 24/7

    33 11.79%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.450v or more 24/7

    33 11.79%
Results 1 to 25 of 403

Thread: E8400/8500 degradation myth possibly busted?

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Quote Originally Posted by dnottis View Post
    Seeing these guys at <1.3 and 4.2Ghz just doesn't even seem realistic. Mine is a good clocker and I need 1.32v for 4.1Ghz and 1.37 for 4.2Ghz. Pushing 4.2 on 1.28v just doesn't sound right to me, thats not going to be enough voltage imo.
    Have you tried 8.5x495-500 and manually setting gtls? Reason I ask is that I had a much easier time getting stability with lower vcore using those settings vs. 9x4xx.

    I think my 745a is a very good chip, one of the best I've seen looking at tons of results. Onepagebook at OCX and a few others with 743a have similar or better performance out of theirs. And like I said earlier, my 748a took 1.36vcore to be stable at 4ghz using the same test method.

    Re: ambient temps, mine are pretty low - mid 60s.
    Last edited by mrcape; 04-04-2008 at 08:20 AM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •