gOJDO,
If your Asus G92GTS has the same PCB as in Demo's pic then it works your card too.
My Asus G92GTS 512MB is reference board so it wouldn't work on mine.
gOJDO,
If your Asus G92GTS has the same PCB as in Demo's pic then it works your card too.
My Asus G92GTS 512MB is reference board so it wouldn't work on mine.
You were not supposed to see this.
RAM sinks are ~$1/each. To me a few dollars spent to maintain some level of safety while improving clocks 15+% is money well spent.
I wouldn't go any higher than where you are w/o some sinks on there. The equivalent components on the reference design are cooled by the stock cooler. If nVidia thinks they should be cooled at stock voltage then don't you think they especially need to be cooled when volt-modding?
ES Q9550 E0 @ 4.0GHz (471x8.5) 1.256v
TR-Ultra-120-X, 115CFM 120mm fan
Maximus II Formula @ 1884MHz FSB
Ballistix DDR2-800 (4x1GB) 1132MHz 5-5-5-5-15 4-55-8-14-11-3-8-5-4-2T
eVGA GTX 280 @ 702c/1404s/1260m (1.175v)
Auzentech XPlosion DTS-Interactive Vantage 'X'-6,727
300GB Velociraptor, PC P&C 750W
(3)120mm, (2)90mm, (1)250mm case fans in TT Armor
27.5" LCD/Z-5500-office, 95" 720P projector/7.1ch-living room
Logitech Driving Force Pro-Microsim Racing Pod
I have RAM heatsinks installed on my card. The RAM doesn't get hot anyway because I didn't increase the vDimm.
The stock cooler had just contact to GPU and RAM with pads. Other parts of the frontside weren't cooled by it. I just have a 120mm fan below the frontside at the bottom of my chase to blow cool air from outside onto the graphics card.
The back of the card gets really hot because here is no nearly no airflow. But these parts there had already no sinks installed with stock.
But you are right, maybe ill get some small sinks on the mosfets
Last edited by Heinzkopf; 03-17-2008 at 10:38 AM.
When I said 'RAM sinks' I meant it generically. I used 'RAM' sinks on my MOSFETS, but I guess it would be better to just call them sinks.
You're right that the RAM doesn't really require sinks, b/c vdimm is low. However, the PCB will get hot, and through conduction heat up the RAM.
On the reference design the MOSFETS are on the other side of the board and are cooled by the stock HSF. Since you have a non-reference design you are going to have to adjust a little bit to compensate.
The entire PCB gets pretty hot when you start getting the volts/clocks up there so it is good to get sinks on anything you can...especially components that are hot enough to burn you. Also, rig up some fans or get a PCI fan card if at all possible.
Last edited by jason4207; 03-17-2008 at 12:10 PM.
ES Q9550 E0 @ 4.0GHz (471x8.5) 1.256v
TR-Ultra-120-X, 115CFM 120mm fan
Maximus II Formula @ 1884MHz FSB
Ballistix DDR2-800 (4x1GB) 1132MHz 5-5-5-5-15 4-55-8-14-11-3-8-5-4-2T
eVGA GTX 280 @ 702c/1404s/1260m (1.175v)
Auzentech XPlosion DTS-Interactive Vantage 'X'-6,727
300GB Velociraptor, PC P&C 750W
(3)120mm, (2)90mm, (1)250mm case fans in TT Armor
27.5" LCD/Z-5500-office, 95" 720P projector/7.1ch-living room
Logitech Driving Force Pro-Microsim Racing Pod
Yes that's true, the whole PCB gets really hot especially around the area of the mosfets. Well best solution was installing a fan that blows air to the backside of the card. But that is a bit dump to put the fan on it- and since I have a silent system another fan would increase the noise of the computer.
Well i'll try to improve the temperatures passivly by heatsinks first. that means sinks on mosfets and maybe the copper mounting holes.
Think that should be enough then.
With stock cooler the GPU reached 90°C as temperature by standard and so I think the card got even a bit hotter as now. additionally I think these mosfets are designed for high temperatures. But yes the ramchips may be the most sensitive parts on the card
ES Q9550 E0 @ 4.0GHz (471x8.5) 1.256v
TR-Ultra-120-X, 115CFM 120mm fan
Maximus II Formula @ 1884MHz FSB
Ballistix DDR2-800 (4x1GB) 1132MHz 5-5-5-5-15 4-55-8-14-11-3-8-5-4-2T
eVGA GTX 280 @ 702c/1404s/1260m (1.175v)
Auzentech XPlosion DTS-Interactive Vantage 'X'-6,727
300GB Velociraptor, PC P&C 750W
(3)120mm, (2)90mm, (1)250mm case fans in TT Armor
27.5" LCD/Z-5500-office, 95" 720P projector/7.1ch-living room
Logitech Driving Force Pro-Microsim Racing Pod
What should be the resistance between these two points (the blue ones)? I think maybe I messed this up, I have close to 16mil between these two points.
scottc19,
Resistance between the SMR you marked should be around 22Ω.
You were not supposed to see this.
1100MHZ no V-Mod stable my card rocks !
Sorry for my bad English !
Please review forum rules.
XSS,
Samsung GDDR3, I presume?
You were not supposed to see this.
Hey guys,
at first the pic:
this is my second try with the OCP mod all soldering points have contact but I think the mod didn't works.
First problem: Card clocks 770/1900/1030 without VMods but for a "little" more GPU Clock I need much more Voltage ( 1,45 V for 850/2200) I think that can not be normal
Second problem: more than 850 MHz isn't possible, not important what voltage I give
Third problem: 850/2200/1000 @ 1,45 V is stable in all Benches but AM3 fully runs and before the score is displayed the screen goes black and don't get back.
This sounds to me like a non working OCP mod :-( can someone help me?
I know that the memory clock is important to the Shader clock, so I test each Clock once.
Vmods for the new XFX8800GT alpha dog edition and the 8800GS:
VGPU: 5K var. resistor.
VMEM: 15K var. resistor.
PWM used for GPU is BN-9G
PWM used for DDR is SC2621A
Kabauterman,
What is your vGPU after a crash/black screen?
You were not supposed to see this.
Then your problem has nothing to do with OCP. That leaves just the traditional "draw of luck" OC'ability of each chip.vGPU is the same as before 1.45V
You were not supposed to see this.
If I can do it anyone can![]()
Good work Dino , now how well does it clock ?
Have you done the second card yet ??
![]()
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
gained 100MHz on core
still on stock cooling
haven't done the second card
my soldering iron isn't that great cause i had trouble soldering to ground points
just wouldn't stick :S
but i got it in the end
the read point was reading 1.988v LOL and then i checked it manually and found it was reading 1.111 ....that was a relief heh
Last edited by dinos22; 03-26-2008 at 06:49 AM.
So what does that add up to ?gained 100MHz on core
That vgpu point is damn tiny ey ? (in your third last pic)
![]()
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
to be honest that was the easiest one to solder
i am just quickly benching
did a 92K 3DMARK01
single card :o pretty good for card clocks and CPU at 5.1GHz![]()
Bookmarks