I asked in another 790i thread....but I'll ask here too anyway:
Is 400fsb (1600QDR) still a hole for quads like 680i?
I asked in another 790i thread....but I'll ask here too anyway:
Is 400fsb (1600QDR) still a hole for quads like 680i?
Made the step and ordered 1 with a qx9650 and 4gb OCZ xtc 1600wich i hope is the same memory as the ocz xtc 2000 sli designed for 790i.
Let the games begin![]()
Last edited by Justifire; 03-19-2008 at 05:36 AM.
QX9650 @ 4450 mhz
Asus Striker II Extreme 790i
4 GB Corsair Dominator 1800 @ 1870 8-8-8-20 1T 1.8v
3 x Asus GTX280 TRI-SLI 810/1647/1296
Asus Xonar DX
Thermaltake Toughpower 1500 W
Dell 30" 3007WFP
Logitech G7, G15, G25
Watercooling Hailea 1500 chiller, EK, Swiftech, D-Tek
Dual Prometeia site
Beautiful. Thanks for the response.....*rushes off to count pennies
Edit: What cpu, multi, and vcore were you able to get 400 fsb? What I'm getting at is my Q6600 does 450 x 8 no problem on my current 680i board (with quite a bit of vcore)....but I want to do 400 x 9....with less voltage than I'm using now, if possible. Trying to figure out if I should invest in 790i.
Last edited by my87csx481; 03-19-2008 at 09:21 AM. Reason: added questions
Don't be sure about that.My new Striker II can't play@1600fsb.It plays fine@1840fsb.But the first Striker II I had(died) could play well almost every fsb.She also had a working TRD setting but the newone doesn't work.
Talking about TRD,does it work on 790?Did you try it elmor?
I had absolutely no issue with the eVGA 780i , I cannot comment on the Asus Formula II. The eVGA with P03 bios went fine at 1600FSB - 1800FSB with the q6600 or QX9650, only linked mode would result in a no post.. but 450FSB with 1200Mhz on the ram went pretty fab... Must be a bios or early chipset issue then for the Asus Formula...
Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved
Remark : They call me Pro AsusSaaya yupp, I agree
Bookmarks