new HD x264 video encoding benchmark

[Gen]

Q6600 G0, 8 x 450=3600, 4gb Ballistix DDR2 1:1 900mhz, 4-4-4-12 Performance LvL 1, Vista with SP1.

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 72.22 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 72.05 fps, 3905.78 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 72.05 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 71.27 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.13 fps, 3952.75 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.19 fps, 3952.82 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.14 fps, 3952.75 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.20 fps, 3952.75 kb/s

i don't see how that other kents beat me @9x400 with 800mhz ram

edit: looks like it's a difference of OS XP vs. Vista maybe

anyway, nice benchmark as was the non hd one, great work on the tables to graysky