Results 1 to 25 of 121

Thread: WD6400AAKS faster than Raptor?

Threaded View

  1. #11
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia! :)
    Posts
    6,096
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    correct.. except for the partitioning part.. this is different its not partitioning

    when i create the array @ 128GB it just uses 32GB from each drive

    the other GBs were sacrificial to the performance gods lol


    nothing.. what can u do with space that doesnt exist? lol

    for actual storage id use these drives @ full but since im using them to install win/apps/games/etc whats the point of 2560GB if i dont need that much.. since 128GB is enough for me for now id rather have the much lower access time
    ... so u 'waste' the other ~600GB on each HDD??

    y cant u make a partition out of it & use it for something else? surely just because it is being 'used' doesnt mean that the first/'fast' partition will suffer will it? - i understand that it would suffer performance-wise *IF* a read/write occurs @ same time on diff partitions - but will it still be affected if the remaining partition is barely accessed? i cant imagine that it should be
    Last edited by tiro_uspsss; 03-07-2008 at 08:49 PM.
    DNA = Design Not Accident
    DNA = Darwin Not Accurate

    heatware / ebay
    HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
    https://prism-break.org/

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •