Page 10 of 180 FirstFirst ... 789101112132060110 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 250 of 4486

Thread: Real Temp - New temp program for Intel Core processors

  1. #226
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK/East Sussex
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    I had a look at things and the only thing that I noticed that might be causing problems for users is if the driver is not being loaded properly then the program won't be able to read your temperatures and will display 100C. I added some code to prevent the program from starting up if it has any issues with loading the driver.

    The driver might not load in Vista if you are in a limited account.

    This is my best guess. Version 2.1 is now available if anyone having problems wants to try these theories.

    http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...7/RealTemp.zip
    error in vista business 64 bit
    Driver error
    Driver not found

    either normal or administrator user

  2. #227
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    GO CANUCKS GO!!!
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by karateo View Post
    error in vista business 64 bit
    Driver error
    Driver not found

    either normal or administrator user
    Doesn't work in 64 bit yet Karateo....read the entire post before posting.

    i7 3770K
    ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe
    16GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600
    240GB HyperX SSD
    EVGA GTX 680 SC+
    X-Fi Fatality
    Corsair AX1200


  3. #228
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    x64 support is still in the future. I need to make sure that this new driver is working 100% in 32 bit before trying to make it work for x64.

  4. #229
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    South FL, USA
    Posts
    4,892
    you are doing a DARN GOOD JOB!...many thanks!
    BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 UNOFFICIAL THREAD

    BIOSTAR TPOWER BOLT MOD FOR HEATPIPE AND HEATSINK

    BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE

    ABIT IP35 PRO HEATPIPE MOD

    ABIT IP35 PRO BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE

    IP35 Pro: 9650@4000Mhz, par overclocker; Freezone Elite; 4Gb GSkill DDR-800@DDR-1068 (2 x 2gb); XFX 8800 GTS; Areca 8X PCIe in Raid 0 working at 4x speed; 4-250 Gb (single platter) 7200.10 drives; Giga 3DAurora case with side window.

  5. #230
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Milano - Italy
    Posts
    480
    Under Vista 32, starting RealTemp 2.1 normally, I have the error "driver not loaded"

    Starting it as administrator, it works perfectly.

  6. #231
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    332
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    Dom7184: Have you ever tried doing the low temp test where you run at about 1600 MHz and 1.10 volts and check your idle temps. I have a B2 E6400 just like yours and I found that my computer would report below ambient idle temperatures during this test. The ++ idle temp correction adjusts my idle temperatures on that processor back up to reality.
    now im getting 1-1 also with both 2.0 and 2.1

  7. #232
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Milano - Italy
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    If your idle temps are different between your two cores by 20C then that is a big red flag that core1 is stuck. What does the Test Sensor test show?
    At my idle situation (2580 MHz and 1.36 V.....I know, not a minimal idle as you suggested) I have my E8400 at -4 C° and +27 C°; at 100% of both cores (prime95) I have 22 C° and 42 C°.

    Testing sensors with realtemp I have them moving 18 and 10.

    It seems my sensors are not stuck and probably at TjMax they will measure the same data; the slope of the linear curve seems a lot different between the two sensors and if I could adjust the two cores separately, probably I can compensate the different slope.

    Any comment?
    Last edited by Brama; 03-05-2008 at 12:36 PM.

  8. #233
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    280
    There is an interesting submission at Anandtech.

    More than a few programs have been released over the last few years, each claiming to accurately report these DTS values in real-time. The truth is that none can be fully trusted as the Tjunction values utilized in these transformations may not always be correct. Moreover, Intel representatives have informed us that these as-of-yet unpublished Tjunction values may actually vary from model to model - sometimes even between different steppings - and that the temperature response curves may not be entirely accurate across the whole reporting range. Since all of today's monitoring programs have come to incorrectly assume that Tjunction values are a function of the processor family/stepping only, we have no choice but to call everything we thought we had come to know into question. Until Intel decides to publish these values on a per-model basis, the best these DTS readings can do for us is give a relative indication of each core's remaining thermal margin, whatever that may be.
    More info here: http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/int...spx?i=3251&p=4
    Last edited by ixtapalapaquetl; 03-05-2008 at 05:23 PM. Reason: speling
    DFI LP UT P35-T2R | E8400 Q743A748 - IHS removed
    Team Xtreme PC2 9600 2x1GB | Auzentech XPlosion
    PCP+C Silencer 750W | 2x36GB Raptors RAID-0 | XFX 7800GT
    Iwaki MD20-RZT | FuZion - 4.4mm - modified ProMount | PA120.3

  9. #234
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4
    Hmmmm.... I'm not entirely convinced my TjMax on my E8400 is 95C, although I'm more than willing to be told otherwise. I have a CoolIt Elite (and am soon moving to watercooling due to the noise) and made the following observations.

    I tried cranking the MTEC to max cooling by dropping the desired coolant temp to 10C. My ambient is about 17C. Hitting a coolant temp of 21C was able to bring a CPU temp average across the cores of about 23C. I'm thinking that at idle that seems pretty accurate. Since I am under the assumption that the coolant temp is measured internally on the cooler itself, that would indicate the TjMax would be correct at about 105C, would it not?

    The only reason I'm thinking this is because I'm set at ++ to get a temp that seems in line with the coolant temp at idle. Anything less would give me a temp below coolant temp - which shouldn't be possible. Once again, I am assuming that the coolant temp is measured within the Elite itself as opposed to any external sensors.

  10. #235
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by Dom7184 View Post
    now im getting 1-1 also with both 2.0 and 2.1
    I don't think your supposed to do the sensor test at the low voltage. That is to determine your offset. Look at your idle temps and compare them to ambients. If they are too high or low use the -, --, +, or ++ setting to get core temps w/n 3-5* above ambient.

    Quote Originally Posted by ixtapalapaquetl View Post
    There is an interesting submission at Anantech.



    More info here: http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/int...spx?i=3251&p=4
    Just read it from a link over on OCF. Was going to post it, but you beat me to it!

    That article kind of throws a monkey wrench into this whole matter! If the article is correct we are back to square 1, and the only advice I can see is to just keep your distance from Tjmax...whatever that may be.

    Forget about absolute temps unless you have an IR thermometer or temp probe.
    ES Q9550 E0 @ 4.0GHz (471x8.5) 1.256v
    TR-Ultra-120-X, 115CFM 120mm fan
    Maximus II Formula @ 1884MHz FSB
    Ballistix DDR2-800 (4x1GB) 1132MHz 5-5-5-5-15 4-55-8-14-11-3-8-5-4-2T
    eVGA GTX 280 @ 702c/1404s/1260m (1.175v)

    Auzentech XPlosion DTS-Interactive Vantage 'X'-6,727
    300GB Velociraptor, PC P&C 750W
    (3)120mm, (2)90mm, (1)250mm case fans in TT Armor

    27.5" LCD/Z-5500-office, 95" 720P projector/7.1ch-living room
    Logitech Driving Force Pro-Microsim Racing Pod

  11. #236
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    Quote Originally Posted by ixtapalapaquetl View Post
    There is an interesting submission at Anantech.
    More info here: http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/int...spx?i=3251&p=4
    Is this really a sign that someone at Intel has been checking out this forum and discovered that we're way too close to the truth now so it was time for a PR to try and throw us off the trail! Maybe Intel isn't very happy with software that shows that their DTS sensors sometimes get stuck on their new 45nm chips. This wasn't an issue before with 65nm.
    Last edited by unclewebb; 03-05-2008 at 02:54 PM.

  12. #237
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    Quote Originally Posted by Dom7184 View Post
    now im getting 1-1 also with both 2.0 and 2.1
    That is normal too. When you drop the volts and MHz down, the processor does not increase in temperature very much at all, even at full load. I was hoping you could report what your reported temperature was vs your ambient temperature and how they compare. I'm hoping that at an Idle setting of 0 with low volts and low MHz that your reported temps will go below ambient, like many other B2 processors do.

  13. #238
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    332
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    That is normal too. When you drop the volts and MHz down, the processor does not increase in temperature very much at all, even at full load. I was hoping you could report what your reported temperature was vs your ambient temperature and how they compare. I'm hoping that at an Idle setting of 0 with low volts and low MHz that your reported temps will go below ambient, like many other B2 processors do.
    okay i check , but does it have to be 1600Ghz or can it be less ? I can get it to 600, 700 or 800 or stock on the lowest volts ?

  14. #239
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4
    so it seems to me like my core that is cooler is prob. more accurate.
    anybody?

  15. #240
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cochrane, Canada
    Posts
    2,042
    Dom7184: If you can run at 1600 MHz then show that one just so I have something I can directly compare to. If you can go lower then post that info as well. The more data the better!

    Moreover, Intel representatives have informed us that these as-of-yet unpublished Tjunction values may actually vary from model to model - sometimes even between different steppings - and that the temperature response curves may not be entirely accurate across the whole reporting range.
    Isn't that the conclusion I came to in post #1? Interesting that Intel has never, ever said anything publicly about this subject until my chart showed the real truth. Remember, you read it here first at XS!
    Last edited by unclewebb; 03-05-2008 at 03:29 PM.

  16. #241
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    332
    room temp 75F 24C Humidity 27%


  17. #242
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    lasershock: Did previous versions work fine for you?
    I'm running 64-bit Vista so I haven't been able to run the previous versions.

    My batch is Q746A502 btw.

  18. #243
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    ARIZONA
    Posts
    1,564
    thks for the answer unclewebb
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    PENT E8400 batch #814A014 ...4.3 at 1.34v~4.7 at 1.45v
    FOXCONN MARS
    COOLIT Eliminator 7*c idle~27~38*c load $95bucks !
    BUFFALO FireStix's ddr2-800 do 1200 eazy at 2.1v
    OCZ 2x2 kit pc2 8500 - 1066 @1069 atm
    Quattro 1000W
    Radeon 2-4850's in crossfire
    OCZ Vertex SSD thanks Tony!
    ALL PIPED INTO HOUSE AIRCOND ;}
    *QUANTUM FORCE* saaya & sham rocks !
    *REAL TEMP*
    At least you've got some Xtreme software now for working in Xtreme situations! "Unclewebb" rocks !
    *MEMSET* Felix rocks !
    *SUPER TEC MAN* UncleJimbo rocks !
    OVERCLOCKERS MAG..http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=197660

  19. #244
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    280
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    Isn't that the conclusion I came to in post #1?
    My thoughts exactly.
    DFI LP UT P35-T2R | E8400 Q743A748 - IHS removed
    Team Xtreme PC2 9600 2x1GB | Auzentech XPlosion
    PCP+C Silencer 750W | 2x36GB Raptors RAID-0 | XFX 7800GT
    Iwaki MD20-RZT | FuZion - 4.4mm - modified ProMount | PA120.3

  20. #245
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    South FL, USA
    Posts
    4,892
    Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
    Is this really a sign that someone at Intel has been checking out this forum and discovered that we're way too close to the truth now so it was time for a PR to try and throw us off the trail! Maybe Intel isn't very happy with software that shows that their DTS sensors sometimes get stuck on their new 45nm chips. This wasn't an issue before with 65nm.
    i think it is more about many buyers returning their penryn/wolfdale processors to their online retailers because of the bum DTS sensors...i did it for a QX9650...
    BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 UNOFFICIAL THREAD

    BIOSTAR TPOWER BOLT MOD FOR HEATPIPE AND HEATSINK

    BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE

    ABIT IP35 PRO HEATPIPE MOD

    ABIT IP35 PRO BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE

    IP35 Pro: 9650@4000Mhz, par overclocker; Freezone Elite; 4Gb GSkill DDR-800@DDR-1068 (2 x 2gb); XFX 8800 GTS; Areca 8X PCIe in Raid 0 working at 4x speed; 4-250 Gb (single platter) 7200.10 drives; Giga 3DAurora case with side window.

  21. #246
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    South FL, USA
    Posts
    4,892
    COOLEST updated his program, coretemp, to work in vista64:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...37#post2819237
    BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 UNOFFICIAL THREAD

    BIOSTAR TPOWER BOLT MOD FOR HEATPIPE AND HEATSINK

    BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE

    ABIT IP35 PRO HEATPIPE MOD

    ABIT IP35 PRO BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE

    IP35 Pro: 9650@4000Mhz, par overclocker; Freezone Elite; 4Gb GSkill DDR-800@DDR-1068 (2 x 2gb); XFX 8800 GTS; Areca 8X PCIe in Raid 0 working at 4x speed; 4-250 Gb (single platter) 7200.10 drives; Giga 3DAurora case with side window.

  22. #247
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    46
    I am definitely getting confused here...

    I have an e4300 at 1.4v and 3.0ghz and CoreTemp shows me 55c load. RealTemp shows me 40c load. A whole 15c gap? What's up with that? If it's correct...I'm pushing this thing farther.

  23. #248
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by Retrospekt View Post
    I am definitely getting confused here...

    I have an e4300 at 1.4v and 3.0ghz and CoreTemp shows me 55c load. RealTemp shows me 40c load. A whole 15c gap? What's up with that? If it's correct...I'm pushing this thing farther.
    What are the 2 reported Tjmax temps? If one is 85, and the other is 100 then there is your answer.
    ES Q9550 E0 @ 4.0GHz (471x8.5) 1.256v
    TR-Ultra-120-X, 115CFM 120mm fan
    Maximus II Formula @ 1884MHz FSB
    Ballistix DDR2-800 (4x1GB) 1132MHz 5-5-5-5-15 4-55-8-14-11-3-8-5-4-2T
    eVGA GTX 280 @ 702c/1404s/1260m (1.175v)

    Auzentech XPlosion DTS-Interactive Vantage 'X'-6,727
    300GB Velociraptor, PC P&C 750W
    (3)120mm, (2)90mm, (1)250mm case fans in TT Armor

    27.5" LCD/Z-5500-office, 95" 720P projector/7.1ch-living room
    Logitech Driving Force Pro-Microsim Racing Pod

  24. #249
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    46
    Yeah, CoreTemp says TJmax is 100, but RealTemp says 85. I assume RealTemp is wrong then? Sorry, I'm a noob.

  25. #250
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    South FL, USA
    Posts
    4,892
    probably realtemp is 'more' accurrate...for now, i will use coretemp, since i am using vista64, until unclewebb is able to get his program to work in vista64..
    BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 UNOFFICIAL THREAD

    BIOSTAR TPOWER BOLT MOD FOR HEATPIPE AND HEATSINK

    BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE

    ABIT IP35 PRO HEATPIPE MOD

    ABIT IP35 PRO BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE

    IP35 Pro: 9650@4000Mhz, par overclocker; Freezone Elite; 4Gb GSkill DDR-800@DDR-1068 (2 x 2gb); XFX 8800 GTS; Areca 8X PCIe in Raid 0 working at 4x speed; 4-250 Gb (single platter) 7200.10 drives; Giga 3DAurora case with side window.

Page 10 of 180 FirstFirst ... 789101112132060110 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •