Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345
Results 101 to 107 of 107

Thread: 9600GT SLI beats 3870X2 in a couple games (inq, expreview)

  1. #101
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    from what i can see form all of the reviews i have seen is that the HD 3870 and 9600gt perform very similar to each other. The cards seem to be mostly tied when gaming without AA (it bounces around lots form game to game) they 9600gt may have a TINY lead without AA and when you turn AA on the lead seems to grow a little bit. but overall they are pretty close.

    so lets say performance is the same. it comes down to:
    power consumption - relatively the same
    heat - i would say 9600gt is a bit cooler
    features - the HD3870 does have DX10.1 but that is useless for while. but overall HD3870 wins
    overclocking - form what i have seen so far the 9600gt oc's like a mad man (past 830 core i believe) and considering shadder clocks scale higher than the HD3870 i would say the 9600 wins by a small margin
    drivers - personally i don't like ATI's drivers and i prefer ntune to CCC overdrive
    Multi GPU - again seems to be very similar depending on the game and settings
    and finally price - Where i come form (Canada) the 9600gt is cheaper than the HD3870 by a good amount. the 9600gt can be had for $180 were the HD3870 is $200 (after the price drop) and if you go for multi GPU price thats a $40 savings. and $360 for a pair of 9600gt's is far cheaper than $450 for a HD3870X2

    this is for Canada not europe and not the US (although they tend to similar) and form what i can tell prices in europe tend to favor ATI cards so in that case the Hd3870 would be the better choice.

    for myself i would choose the 9600gt but both cards are good and are very competitive to each other.
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  2. #102
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    412
    Quote Originally Posted by Sr7 View Post
    So whatever is *wrong* is only affecting ATI?

    Logic Fail!

    What's wrong with using an SLI motherboard? Does the chipset have an "Auto-slowdown-ATI" feature in the BIOS?
    My board actually has a "Ati detected, speedupmode enabled". It sets the PCI-E frequency to 125 MHz when and Ati graphicscard is detected ,-) (RD600).
    Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 rev 1,0| AMD FX-8120@?| Corsair H100| 2x4 GB Patriot Viper Xtreme Division 2 PC15000 9-11-9-27| 2*Powercolor Radeon HD6970 2048MB @ Crossfire| 3*NEC MultiSync EA231WMi 23" Monitorer @ Eyefinity| OCZ Vertex 3 60 GB| 2*Intel 80GB X25-M G2 @ RAID0| Cooler Master Silent Pro M1000W| Cooler Master ATCS 840|

  3. #103
    iadstudio
    Guest
    This just proves that ATI needs to get CrossfireX drivers ironed out and needs to lower the price on their cards.

  4. #104
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    428
    What's interesting is that if you go by Expreview numbers then 9600GT SLI is the fastest setup on the planet, faster than 8800GT SLI and 8800Ultra as well. Is that truly possible?

    If so to hell with the next gen, let's all buy 9600Gt's and SLi them!

    Only problem is how do I use EVGA stepup for my 8800GTX to get a 9600GT?
    Last edited by bluehaze; 02-27-2008 at 04:47 PM.

  5. #105
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    82
    The launch has been delayed so many times... Maybe Nvidia realised they have spent the last year developing a card that can't actually match the Ati equivalent and are desperately trying to get performance up before they have to release it.
    Serenity:
    Core2 E6600
    Abit IN9 32X-MAX
    Corsair PC2-6400C4D
    2x BFG OC2 8800GTS in SLI
    Dell 3007WFP-HC

  6. #106
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811

    This pic is provided by another user using Vista and Maximus Extreme motherboard. He uses a Q6600 at 3.0 (I assume that a QX9650 would give a higher SM2.0 and SM3.0 score). But using what we have we know that QX9650 provides a score of 4509 looking at Hardware Secrets review. Using 3dmark06 calculator we get a score of 16292. This is not including the possible increase in SM2.0 and SM3.0 with a QX9650 from a Q6600. 16292 is by no means an accurate score but it does reflect the some increase when going from a X38 vs 780i. This in all shows that the score using a X2 with a 780i is lower then expected.
    Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 02-28-2008 at 12:26 AM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #107
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle View Post

    This pic is provided by another user using Vista and Maximus Extreme motherboard. He uses a Q6600 at 3.0 (I assume that a QX9650 would give a higher SM2.0 and SM3.0 score). But using what we have we know that QX9650 provides a score of 4509 looking at Hardware Secrets review. Using 3dmark06 calculator we get a score of 16292. This is not including the possible increase in SM2.0 and SM3.0 with a QX9650 from a Q6600. 16292 is by no means an accurate score but it does reflect the some increase when going from a X38 vs 780i. This in all shows that the score using a X2 with a 780i is lower then expected.
    I really hope you're kididng me... 100 points is proof? Of what? Even if it is 100 points higher, that doesn't prove that that phenomenon only affects X2.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •