Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 107

Thread: 9600GT SLI beats 3870X2 in a couple games (inq, expreview)

  1. #51
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    And I was saying 3850CF vs 9600GT SLI is a better comparison.
    Well, for the most part, Crossfire is Crossfire, and profiles are profiles.

  2. #52
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    you could compare 3870 crossfire to 9600gt sli and get the same results basically. although the 3870 crossfire is only like $10 more than a 9600gt sli, so seeing it getting outperformed isnt so appalling.
    Last edited by grimREEFER; 02-26-2008 at 04:28 AM.
    DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis

  3. #53
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Sr7 View Post
    Well, for the most part, Crossfire is Crossfire, and profiles are profiles.
    You use ATI High end to compare but u can also use Nvidia High end
    This test is not about X2 versus 9600GT Sli so why u isolate this result from the test...

    Moreover if +8% with 2 games is a large margin +45% versus 8800GTS 512 is what?
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  4. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    You use ATI High end to compare but u can also use Nvidia High end
    This test is not about X2 versus 9600GT Sli so why u isolate this result from the test...

    Moreover if +8% with 2 games is a large margin +45% versus 8800GTS 512 is what?
    What are you talking about +8%? Look at the games. The 3dmark score is obviously going to be a different story, but fortunately you don't play 3dmark so I don't know why that matters.

    The 8% is also a poor number for the review site to have calculated, because it's completely misleading...even though the 9600GT's loss was very low there in 3dmark for each test, they ran way more tests with 3dmark, giving it an unproportional weight in the *overall* score they give (8%). This drags down the overall average from the high numbers shown in the actual games.

    You could arbitrarily run 2 COD4 tests, or 20 COD4 tests... it will drastically change the overall..

    I guess you didn't notice this.
    Last edited by Sr7; 02-26-2008 at 04:31 AM.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Just notice score are misleading. 2 Games benchmarks, 2 games without timedemos.
    Only one review with 9600 GT SLI and 3870 X2 in it that i know is Firingsquad's review. COD 4 shows different picture in it :


    So why trust Expreview over Firingsquad

    http://firingsquad.com/hardware/gefo...nce/page11.asp
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  6. #56
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    Ya I guess, it just depends on what site you look at, and how they benchmark.

    Even so, to me it's impressive if the 9600GT SLI even ties in any case, seeing as it's meant to be a mid-range card (relative to the rest of the line-up). They've beaten the price of the 3870 down with a stick.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Anyone know a review that has HD3870X2 scoring anywhere near 15k in 3DMark06? The ones I could find are 11-12k due to "slow" DC CPUs like E6600.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  8. #58
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    Anyone know a review that has HD3870X2 scoring anywhere near 15k in 3DMark06? The ones I could find are 11-12k due to "slow" DC CPUs like E6600.
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5272142
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5272142
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5141334
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5222145
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  9. #59
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    Anyone know a review that has HD3870X2 scoring anywhere near 15k in 3DMark06? The ones I could find are 11-12k due to "slow" DC CPUs like E6600.
    http://www.fpslabs.com/reviews/video...-take-2/page-3


    this should do

  10. #60
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    Anyone know a review that has HD3870X2 scoring anywhere near 15k in 3DMark06? The ones I could find are 11-12k due to "slow" DC CPUs like E6600.
    http://www.clubic.com/article-92330-...680-rv670.html
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  11. #61
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Sr7 View Post
    Ya I guess, it just depends on what site you look at, and how they benchmark.

    Even so, to me it's impressive if the 9600GT SLI even ties in any case, seeing as it's meant to be a mid-range card (relative to the rest of the line-up). They've beaten the price of the 3870 down with a stick.
    3870 and 9600GT cost the same in Europe and 3870 CF is better than 9600GT SLI. 3850 CF cost even less and OC like a beast
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  12. #62
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    3870 and 9600GT cost the same in Europe and 3870 CF is better than 9600GT SLI. 3850 CF cost even less and OC like a beast
    Well they're only $10 apart here in the US, but the 9600GT isn't very far behind the 3870 in most cases, in some cases it's ahead. I think it balances out to just about equal.

  13. #63
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,715
    YES it happend, here is my test! 9600 GT SLI ...

    http://pctuning.tyden.cz/index.php?o...1&limitstart=2

  14. #64
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    the 3870X2 is 2 190 dollar videocards smashed together into 1 card.

    9600GT is 2 190 dollar videocard cards running together.

    is there really any surprise here?




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  15. #65
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak View Post
    the 3870X2 is 2 190 dollar videocards smashed together into 1 card.

    9600GT is 2 190 dollar videocard cards running together.

    is there really any surprise here?
    Yes... everyone knew it would be close but it's just interesting to see that it can actually beat the x2 in some cases.

  16. #66
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    It beats the X2 like it beat all the Nvidia High End (GTX and Ultra)
    So rename the thread to "9600GT beats all the High End"
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  17. #67
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    25
    http://www.fpslabs.com/reviews/video...-take-2/page-3

    best score i've seen with a 3870 x2 so far

  18. #68
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kavala , Greece
    Posts
    258
    I can't really understand why it is always Nvidia vs ATI. In my opinion the real truth is something like Intel vs Nvidia. Most buyers prefer to buy motherboards with Intel chipset so they are probably going to use ATI video cards in crossfire if they want to have the biggest graphic performance with their system. Personally i can understand that Nvidia builds more powerful video cards but i don't like to have Nvidia chipset in my motherboard and i prefer ATI's video quality.

    P.S. I have used both Nvidia and ATI in the past with my systems.
    Intel Core i7 930 @ 4.1 GHz (196x21 - 1.28v)
    Corsair H50 (2x Noctua NF-P12 in Push/Pull)
    Asus P6T Deluxe/OC Palm Edition
    Asus 4870x2 (Stock)
    3GB G.Skill DDR3 PC3-12800
    3x Seagate Savvio 15K 36GB in Raid 0 on Perc 5/i
    2x Samsung Spinpoint HD501LJ in Raid 0
    2x Western Digital WD6400AAKS
    Creative SB X-Fi Elite Pro series / Logitech Z-5500 THX
    Razer Lycosa Mirror Edition / Razer Lachesis
    Coolermaster HAF 932
    Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W PSU
    HP LP2475w

  19. #69
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by ATI-RaWpOwEr View Post
    http://www.fpslabs.com/reviews/video...-take-2/page-3

    best score i've seen with a 3870 x2 so far
    4Ghz Penryn.
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  20. #70
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    4Ghz Penryn.
    actually if you see the sreenshot of the 3dmark06 when tha bench was made it was only 3.2

  21. #71
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    You'd better look closer
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  22. #72
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    One advantage with 9600 SLI over x2 is that if the x2 breaks you have no PC, if one 9600 breaks then you can still use your PC. But for performance it's very equal, hence why this thread is so long. Both options seem pretty good.

    One thing it does show up is that previous nvidia 8500/8600 and 2600 for AMD were not that good as a midrange part. It's no wonder the 8800 GTS 320M and 8800GT were so popular.

    Regards
    Andy

  23. #73
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Go 3870 CF that simple! and u can add one extra card or more!!!
    Just a pity Nvidia reserved Tri SLI for the elite
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  24. #74
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    10009
    Posts
    3,628
    lets see 2 9600gt stock cooled get past 20k in 2006 on a cd2 (dual core) then I'll be impressed

  25. #75
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,715
    in my country are TWO 9600GTs cheaper then 3870X2 ...

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •