Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 77

Thread: NVIDIA Acquires AGEIA : Official!

  1. #51
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,780
    I guess we know why Nvidia have been milking their current video card architecture for so long. They have been raking in all the money they could from their G80/G92 sales to buy out Ageia.
    Silverstone Temjin TJ-09BW w/ Silverstone DA750
    Asus P8P67
    2600K w/ Thermalright Venomous X Black w/ Sanyo Denki San Ace 109R1212H1011
    8GB G.Skill DDR-1600 7-8-7-24
    Gigabyte GTX 460 1G
    Modded Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty w/ Klipsch Promedia 2.1
    1 X 120GB OCZ Vertex
    1 X 300GB WD Velociraptor HLFS
    1 X Hitachi 7K1000 1TB
    Pioneer DVR-216L DVD-RW
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64


    Quote Originally Posted by alexio View Post
    From the hip and aim at the kitchen if she doesn't approve your purchases. She'll know better next time.

  2. #52
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    I dont think we will see physics on GPU. Buying Aegia is basicly like saying physics on GPUs will always suck, we need PPU. Maybe one day tho they will merge the 2 dies. But would still be seperate I bet.

    AMD and nVidia have basicly been wasting 2-3 years on physics on GPUs without really going anywhere.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #53
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Nanometer View Post
    ya! you show them! we wont buy their cards anymore!
    lol, i been boycotting them since 2001. My last nvidia card was Ti4200.


    Everyone here cant seem to realise that all games released up to date had only used small amount of effect physics because the physx market is very small and game developers dont want to lock them self into a small portion of the games market. You have not seen what a PPU can do, the CPU can handle small physics tasks but for full on gameplay physics the CPU is not enough. This was same when first GPU came on everyone said that its a waste and they should leave it with the CPU but then a killer app came along (Quake) and showed how much more can a GPU deliver.

    Because Nvidia bought Agiea we wont be seeing this killer app for quite some time, nvidia is only going to push for general physics effects like they have been doing with DX10.
    TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)

    TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)

  4. #54
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    881
    This could be good and bad. Nvidia's future cards will probably have good physics processing abilities. But the future Nvidia sponsored games will probably have physics options that's exclusively available to Nvidia cards only.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,713
    Quote Originally Posted by awdrifter View Post
    This could be good and bad. Nvidia's future cards will probably have good physics processing abilities. But the future Nvidia sponsored games will probably have physics options that's exclusively available to Nvidia cards only.
    Exactly, Nvidia the Microsoft's twin.
    TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)

    TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)

  6. #56
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    495

    CM Stacker 810 w/ Yate Loons | Enermax Infiniti 650W
    ASUS P5K Deluxe | Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400 2x2GB
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 | Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    BFG Geforce 8800GTS 640MB | ASUS Ageia PhysX P1 128MB
    Logitech G15 | Logitech G5

  7. #57
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    822
    YAY!!!! now for some real physics cards to hit the market
    Media PC:[AMD x2 4800][MSI K9N-SLI][2x1gig Corsair DDR2 800][ATI 3650 AIW][Asus Xonar D2X][500gig Samsung SATA][Crap Antec Case and PSU]


  8. #58
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by awdrifter View Post
    This could be good and bad. Nvidia's future cards will probably have good physics processing abilities. But the future Nvidia sponsored games will probably have physics options that's exclusively available to Nvidia cards only.
    That's the thing, with Nvidia's developer relations growing strong, games that will support Nvidia's PhysicX are gonna be a lots, including triple A titles, which will add incentive to buying Nvidia graphics cards --> flawless plan, let's see how good they carry it out.
    Core i7 8700k @ 5.1Ghz * Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 5 * 4x8GB Corsair RGB @ 3600 16-18-18-36 * GTX 1080ti @ 2050/11400 * Plextor M8Pe 512GB * Creative Sound Blaster Z * Audioengine 5+ * Corsair Obsidian 750D * Corsair RM1000 watt

  9. #59
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by Face View Post
    Wow, can you believe it? Fudzilla actually got it right this time .. dang.
    From a week ago:
    http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...=5260&Itemid=1

    Oh and he pwnt Kyle
    http://hardocp.com/news.html?news=Mz...VudGh1c2lhc3Q=
    Kyle = dumbass
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  10. #60
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Krizby87 View Post
    That's the thing, with Nvidia's developer relations growing strong, games that will support Nvidia's PhysicX are gonna be a lots, including triple A titles, which will add incentive to buying Nvidia graphics cards --> flawless plan, let's see how good they carry it out.
    probably the same way as DX10, minimal
    TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)

    TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)

  11. #61
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Between Sky and Earth
    Posts
    2,035
    Finally my time to laugh at those who laugh at me last time, ..."that would never happen - there is no space for an Ageia Physic CIP on PCB" they say. Just look, it happened, I doubt the space will be a problem - they'll just make a bigger PCB (see ATi 3870X2).

  12. #62
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    866
    I notice everyone keeps mentioning. What will Nvidia do with "Ageia." I think its more like. What will Nvidia do with the newly aquired physics processor. Has everyone forgot about 3dfx already. let me put it to you this way with a question.

    Are we running Voodoo 8800GT's in our machines?
    I dought the name will stay, and if so, Ill be kinda annoyed, caue Ageia is a pretty stupid sounding name, in my opinion.

    Quote Originally Posted by XSAlliN View Post
    Finally my time to laugh at those who laugh at me last time, ..."that would never happen - there is no space for an Ageia Physic CIP on PCB" they say. Just look, it happened, I doubt the space will be a problem - they'll just make a bigger PCB (see ATi 3870X2).
    IF anyone thought space was a problem then thats completely retarded. I mean, look at the freaking 9800GX2 for the love of god. lol
    This post above was delayed 90 times by Nvidia. Cause that's their thing, thats what they do.
    This Announcement of the delayed post above has been brought to you by Nvidia Inc.

    RIGGY
    case:Antec 1200
    MB: XFX Nforce 750I SLI 72D9
    CPU:E8400 (1651/4x9) 3712.48
    MEM:4gb Gskill DDR21000 (5-5-5-15)
    GPU: NVIDIA GTX260 EVGA SSC (X2 in SLI) both 652/1403
    PS:Corsair 650TX
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
    --Cooling--
    5x120mm 1x200mm
    Zalman 9700LED
    Displays: Samsung LN32B650/Samsung 2243BWX/samsung P2350


  13. #63
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Decami View Post
    I notice everyone keeps mentioning. What will Nvidia do with "Ageia." I think its more like. What will Nvidia do with the newly aquired physics processor. Has everyone forgot about 3dfx already. let me put it to you this way with a question.

    Are we running Voodoo 8800GT's in our machines?
    I dought the name will stay, and if so, Ill be kinda annoyed, caue Ageia is a pretty stupid sounding name, in my opinion.
    Agiea is word that we use that represents a company responsible for making PPU's. So instead of saying physics processor everytime we say Agiea because that means the whole company not just its processor, they also make physics API.
    TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)

    TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)

  14. #64
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    i've just read the article on xbit labs (http://xbitlabs.com/articles/editori...view-2008.html) and it sounds like ageia will stay in business on its own - at least for the time being.
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  15. #65
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Portsmouth, UK
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by Decami View Post
    I notice everyone keeps mentioning. What will Nvidia do with "Ageia." I think its more like. What will Nvidia do with the newly aquired physics processor. Has everyone forgot about 3dfx already. let me put it to you this way with a question.

    Are we running Voodoo 8800GT's in our machines?
    I dought the name will stay, and if so, Ill be kinda annoyed, caue Ageia is a pretty stupid sounding name, in my opinion.



    IF anyone thought space was a problem then thats completely retarded. I mean, look at the freaking 9800GX2 for the love of god. lol
    The API is what nVidia can use to create their next gen GPU's with built in Physics Processing. If they stick with the chip they can always stick it where the NVIO chip used to be.

  16. #66
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Yankee Nation
    Posts
    361
    Anandtech article:

    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3224

    Interesting read, with speculation about how NV is going to use Ageia's IP in their future products.
    Stealth Water


    Quote Originally Posted by TheGanG View Post
    Yeah, x15 makes me happy...

  17. #67
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    639
    I wonder what AMD is gona do about this....Intel has Havok and Nvidia has Ageia
    | Intel Core i5 2500K | Asrock P67 Extreme 6 | Gskill Ripjaws 8GB CL7 |

    | Sapphire HD6970 | Creative X-Fi modded | Corsair HX850 | Corsair H60 |



  18. #68
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by XSAlliN View Post
    I doubt the space will be a problem - they'll just make a bigger PCB (see ATi 3870X2).
    Considering NVIDIA needed a PCB as long as 3870X2's to make a single chip card (GTX and Ultra), and will need two PCBs in the 9800GTX for two chips, I doubt that they can add another chip maintaining a single PCB design.

    And that's assuming that the AGEIA chip doesn't need its own RAM...
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Garner, NC
    Posts
    141
    I have a question...Does anyone actually have a Physics chip in their system? or is all this "it won't make a difference" just speculation?

    I am curious b/c I have toyed with getting one for my future build (Going NON-sli)....
    When Lightning strikes...The Heartbeat stops...



  20. #70
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    In related news to this: NVIDIA completes Ageia buyout.
    That was pretty quick, as they completed the buyout 9 days after officially announcing it. I guess they must have been busy with it for quite some time or something.

  21. #71
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,713
    Quote Originally Posted by kodiak kid View Post
    I have a question...Does anyone actually have a Physics chip in their system? or is all this "it won't make a difference" just speculation?

    I am curious b/c I have toyed with getting one for my future build (Going NON-sli)....
    I think few people on forums do have the Phyxs but i dont think its anyone who has posted in this thread.
    TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)

    TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)

  22. #72
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Portsmouth, UK
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by kodiak kid View Post
    I have a question...Does anyone actually have a Physics chip in their system? or is all this "it won't make a difference" just speculation?

    I am curious b/c I have toyed with getting one for my future build (Going NON-sli)....
    I have one but I had to take it out due to a GFX card taking up the last PCI slot with it's cooler. I was gonna get one in PCIe but what with nVidia buying them i'll not bother.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    128
    Nividia + Ageia = meh.

    If they begin to utilize the physics tech, great. If they don't, great. I may just be weird, but I don't really see too much potential. As long as graphics continue to get better, I could care less if things do stuff realistically or not.
    “When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.”

    -Jimi Hendrix

  24. #74
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    home
    Posts
    73
    at least the topic about new ppu hardware is buried. the only usefull thing nvidia acquired is the software layer/sdk tools; the rest is open for speculation

  25. #75
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    aarhus, denmark...
    Posts
    468
    I have a PPU card. And, I played GRAW2, using the setup in sig @ 1920x1200, settings maxed out.

    It's gonna take some serious GPUs to do both physics acceleration and rendering at the same time. I mean, some of the physics acceleration in GRAW2 drags frames down drastically (even @ 1600x1200). As the physics in GRAW2 is mainly “effects physics” (and not “gameplay physics”), this drag must be GPU and not CPU related.

    For the sake of argument: Try imagining any nVidia GPU running Crysis in DX10, HD, high graphics settings and calculating the physics acceleration of the game - at the same time. I think you get the picture by picture by picture by picture... frame rates

    Contrary to what Anandtech writes and what has been indicated in various statements on the acquisition (including the press releases from nVidia), I still think we will see a PhysX technology implementation that goes beyond merely using the PhysX software on nVidia GPUs (combined with minor GPU architectural optimizations/improvements). Time will show…

    On a side note: To judge from Ageia's US patent application, this acquisition is what they were hoping for, from the very beginning of their effort to bring real-time physics acceleration to 3D environments:

    [...] It is readily foreseeable that a PPU and a GPU will be combined on a single interface card. That is, both chips will be physically mounted on the same card (AGP or PCI-Express), but not directly interfaced with one another. Ultimately, a single interface card having a directly interfaced PPU-GPU combination is expected, but such a combination is probably a generation away. So too is a combination within a single chip of PPU and CPU functionalities.
    Paragraph [0061].

    That the team at Ageia (in all probability) didn't make a lot of dough through selling now - due to financial difficulties - lies IMO entirely on their inability to understand the diversity of the enthusiast market segment. That is, not only focusing on the gamers, but also the benchers, overclockers, modders and crunchers/folders. Talk about Xtreme disappointment! When Ageia tried to right this huge mistake, it was way too little, way too late.
    • DFI LANParty LT X38-T2R Rev. AA1
    • Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 4009MHz, 1.31V
    • TRUE @ 2x Scythe S-Flex SFF21F, 5V
    • 4 x 2GB G.Skill Pi PC2-8800
    • MSI R4870X2-T2D2G-OC
    • 3x 74GB Raptor ICH9R Raid0 @ 128KB Stripe Size
    • Plextor PX-716SA/T3KB DVD-RW
    • Auzen X-Fi Prelude @ TI OPA637AU - Thule - Dali/Ultimate Ears - Argento
    • SilverStone OP700
    • CM Stacker 830 Evo
    • Eizo FlexScan HD2441W - Audioquest DV-X
    • WinVista Ultimate 64bit SP1

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •