Page 3 of 38 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 934

Thread: 2008 XS Cheapazchips 3D challenge

  1. #51
    ¿
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,772
    Actually a fun contest needs less rules...if any at all

    I will play, Gautam needs some competition

  2. #52
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    157
    Im iN i have a couple of 8400's and 2400's here so im keen
    Mine: i5 2500k @ 4.7gig - CM 212+ - GTX570 - Giga P67A-UD4 - 2 x 4gig Ripjaws 1600Mhz - OCZ vertex 2 120g - Corsair TX750 - Antec 300
    Wifies : Asrock 880GMH - Phenom II B50@3.5 gig - Gskill 2 x 2gig DDR3 1333 - HIS 5770 - 74g Raptor - CM TX3 - Vantec 620w PSU
    Kids: Asus M4N68 - Athlon x2 3800+ - 2 x 2gig Kingston - 8800GTS - CM TX3 - 74gig raptor - TT 550w

  3. #53
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Germany, near Stuttgart
    Posts
    1,076
    count me in!
    E2160 @ 360x9, max 390x9 watercooled
    GA-P35-DS3
    Cellshock D9GMH @ 545mhz cl5-5-5-5-15
    Palit 7300gt 500/1000 @ 780/1600 watercooled

  4. #54
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,072
    I'm in and i think we should all use the same card. Not that we're copying the other guys, but the 8400GS is prefect for the purpose. 2k1 benching ?

  5. #55
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    521
    We dont need more rules, we need more information..

    As someone already said we should use the same card

  6. #56
    3D Team Captain Don_Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    4,199
    At first we have to determine which card will be the chosen one to be tortured by us. And for benching, in my opinion we should use the benchmark that is most dependent on GPU-power ( that is 2k1, isn't it? ), and maybe limit the CPU-frequency to make it at least a bit comparable ( most users will use a Core2Duo I guess ).

    Some thoughts:
    1. CPU frequency fixed to ???? ( 3GHz?! )
    2. dual cores and quads? different categories?
    3. categories determinded by core temps of GPU ( as suggested by STEvil )

    What do you guys think?

    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    You can never have enough D9's.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    521
    Quote Originally Posted by Don_Dan View Post
    At first we have to determine which card will be the chosen one to be tortured by us. And for benching, in my opinion we should use the benchmark that is most dependent on GPU-power ( that is 2k1, isn't it? ), and maybe limit the CPU-frequency to make it at least a bit comparable ( most users will use a Core2Duo I guess ).

    Some thoughts:
    1. CPU frequency fixed to ???? ( 3GHz?! )
    2. dual cores and quads? different categories?
    3. categories determinded by core temps of GPU ( as suggested by STEvil )

    What do you guys think?

    The most dependent on gpu power is 3D03, but 01 is more funny

    I think 3Ghz is too low

  8. #58
    3D Team Captain Don_Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    4,199
    Okay, I have never seriously benched 3D so you can tell me whatever you want...


    However, I would still stick to 3GHz so that many people can take part, as that will just make it more fun. But let's hear what others have to say regarding this.

    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    You can never have enough D9's.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Germany, near Stuttgart
    Posts
    1,076
    i would rather make:

    % overclock on core
    % overclock on mem

    best score below 3,5ghz, best score above

    but i think fun should be on place one!
    E2160 @ 360x9, max 390x9 watercooled
    GA-P35-DS3
    Cellshock D9GMH @ 545mhz cl5-5-5-5-15
    Palit 7300gt 500/1000 @ 780/1600 watercooled

  10. #60
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    3,814
    I'm definitely in. Thought this was a great idea when you were talking about it in your Shed Thread.
    A wolf in wolves clothing.

  11. #61
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Well I am glad there is some interest

    Ok, first of all we all have to be benching the same card. It's a competition and based on the Orb so we will be seeing who can get the highest ORB score in the class. If that means that you would have to buy a new card then now is the time, if you cannot afford that, to fold gently and give more chance of winning .As per the classes I suggest all air cooled gpu and anything goes gpu with competions in 2001 and 03.

    Secondly, I agree, we have already seen a recent nvidia 8400GS comp so other cards would be good. I suggest the Ati 2400Pro as it is widely available, cheap and is so bad it puts all the skill on the overclocking of the video card.

    Other possibilities would be the nvidia 7100GS or 7300GS or similar. Any other suggestions?

    Extra rule

    3) MAX LOD = 0 and no third party software to reduce texture levels or MIP levels

    Just so we are concentrating on the hardware side

    Any suggestions on the card to use? Once we have got that then I will ask for a list of participants and we can sort out start date etc and other funky stuff and create a new offical thread and get rolling.

    Regards

    Andy


    PS Sorry for the large size, just getting peoples attention.

    PPS No Kingpin or Hipro or Lardarse or Kinc? Scaredy cats !
    Last edited by zakelwe; 01-25-2008 at 01:17 PM.

  12. #62
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Guy's don't worry about cpu power too much, if the gpu or mem on the card is that bad then the cpu power will be wasted anyway.

    We will run 03 anyway as well as 2001 so it will give any guy running a 486 DX33 with Dos 6.22 a good shot as well.

    Regards

    Andy

  13. #63
    all outta gum
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3,390
    Seeing as 7100GS is hardly available, 7200GS would be better choice.
    www.teampclab.pl
    MOA 2009 Poland #2, AMD Black Ops 2010, MOA 2011 Poland #1, MOA 2011 EMEA #12

    Test bench: empty

  14. #64
    Xtremely Addicted
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NL
    Posts
    2,471
    Nice these cheap gpu contests are good fun! Zakelwe i understand this is XS and we believe that people wil play fair in such a friendly contest but i do think the extra rule wil make judging the scores more difficult. Why not allow all lod/mipmap etc tweaks?

  15. #65
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Germany, near Stuttgart
    Posts
    1,076
    i would rather like the 8400 or 8500 cards! ati-cards are not as easy to overclock!
    E2160 @ 360x9, max 390x9 watercooled
    GA-P35-DS3
    Cellshock D9GMH @ 545mhz cl5-5-5-5-15
    Palit 7300gt 500/1000 @ 780/1600 watercooled

  16. #66
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by xoqolatl View Post
    Seeing as 7100GS is hardly available, 7200GS would be better choice.
    I can't see 7200GS on the ORB so I left it out as I am not sure if it will not be represented at all or fall into another card table so cause confusion.

    Regards

    Andy

  17. #67
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by loc.o View Post
    Nice these cheap gpu contests are good fun! Zakelwe i understand this is XS and we believe that people wil play fair in such a friendly contest but i do think the extra rule wil make judging the scores more difficult. Why not allow all lod/mipmap etc tweaks?
    Good question and thoughts. The problem is that if you allow any sort of software optimisation then in theory a guy who just buys a standard card and then runs it with 3 blobs on the screen will perhaps win having done feck all.

    On the otherhand if people want optimisations then rule 3 can be canned and we can probably still spot anything too extreme. The choice is up to the competitors.

    My rules are very fluid, depending on the common concensus

    Regards

    Andy

  18. #68
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    I don't think we should limit cooling as that'll limit how ridiculous we can get. I was hoping to see 2+ vgpu runs with 5+GHz CPUs. I know that's what I'll be doing, even if it doesn't count. If anything just run 2 classes, "Little School Girls" and "LN2:Breakfast of Champions".

  19. #69
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bancroft, ON, Canada
    Posts
    3,645
    I like the rules as you have them Andy, keep the tweaks on the hardware side

    I like the 2400 pro as the contest card because it's sub 50 bucks and if I do blow it all to heck, I honestly, truly do not care at all. I don't think that card can be "saved" by any CPU no matter how good so it makes sense too. Is replacing the mem on the card within the rules? lol
    "Foldin, Foldin, Foldin...keep those benchers foldin..." (Lyrics by Angra, Music is Rawhide)

    BOYCOTT MIR's

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkeywoman View Post
    aww an OC virgin! lose it tonight with Xtremesystems!!!

  20. #70
    HARD CRUNCHER!!
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,787
    7300gs would be nice, as I have one

  21. #71
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    428
    I'm in, but I don't see a point to limiting software optimizations as we all have the same tools, atleast we should allow LOD tweaking. It just adds an extra level of depth to the contest.

  22. #72
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe View Post

    Extra rule

    3) MAX LOD = 0 and no third party software to reduce texture levels or MIP levels

    Just so we are concentrating on the hardware side

    Regards
    That's all just part of the game.

  23. #73
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler View Post
    I don't think we should limit cooling as that'll limit how ridiculous we can get. I was hoping to see 2+ vgpu runs with 5+GHz CPUs. I know that's what I'll be doing, even if it doesn't count. If anything just run 2 classes, "Little School Girls" and "LN2:Breakfast of Champions".
    I guess I am in the little school girls class

    Sounds good. Two classes, Top fuel and Pro Street it is then ( to give them better names )

    Top fuel class = Any cooling at all on all components.
    Pro Stock Class = Air cooled only.

    We could stretch the Pro Stock class to watercooling on cpu if somebody wishes to enter and would be excluded otherwise.

    Regards

    Andy

  24. #74
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    I see LOD tweaking is getting the thumbs up. Post here on what you think and I'll take the concensus in 12 hours time. This comp is for you to have fun and if you will have more fun using software tweaks then that's fine.

    I know LOD etc splits opinion so we need to get this fixed before the final thread is put up and people start their engines.

    Regards

    Andy

  25. #75
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    I'd say LOD tweaks should only be enabled if we do 3D01 as it is free and you can run the tests in any order, unlike 3D03 which requires a $20 license. So is it going to be the 8400GS or 2400Pro? I like the GS as it's a proven clocker

Page 3 of 38 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •