Quote Originally Posted by luihed View Post
First time for me benching with lower clocks and from what Ive done at 5ghz+ the 45nm cpus dont have too much advantage in 32m like it does on 1m... if you look at the WR database youll see what I mean but I was comparing 65nm times by Team Japan lol....
i have to disagree...look at the 9min and 10min categories here.

my 65nm frequencies are substantially lower than any other 65nm (thanks to high FSB and DDR3) and sobih25's posted 45nm frequencies absolutely destroy mine (over 300MHz advantage) and i am at higher FSB on all of them. perhaps you aren't seeing as big a difference because of the low FSB (FSB means everything in 32M) or something but 45nm is definitely showing a huge difference in 32M in a lot of other peoples results. of course i can't fully find out the difference with a direct comparison on my setups until someone in Canada gets stock on E8500/E8400s but when they do i'll definitely be having fun.


Quote Originally Posted by luihed View Post
Is this one ok?
10.xx
http://ocidb.com/albums/userpics/10062/normal_10_xx.PNG
thats a lot better considering your FSB and the mem speed. once some folks get some high FSB 45nm chips, the 32M times we see now with these QX9650s at 450FSB will look like 65nm times in comparison....mmmm, 562*8 4500MHz 3:5 933MHz 7-6-5 sub 10min