It's a funny thread.![]()
Basically most chips with a CB and "some" which don't have one to -30C, extremely rare something goes beneath that. Now if they'd just bought any off the shelf and said "no CB" then I might have thought that as valid, but cherry picking one out of 1000s for no CB to sub -5C isn't exactly any good at showing CPU SKUs without a CB.
I mean this, this, this, this and all these in green are mainly close to or subzero (depending on which temp sensor you look at).
I'm sure guys there like fredyama went through tons of chips to find one without CB to get those MHz/cooling and even still, it was only the QX sorta FX chips or one or two odd Opties and X2. At 65nm G2, 5000+ BE seems to love cold to -20-15C IHS region though.
Problem with those A64/AM2s was, they were sensitive to heat/voltage and thus could scale better under water/DICE than air usually. That doesn't look like Phenom since 1.2V gets you the same as 1.7V while temps are kept sub40C i.e. design/process/material problems. nFET leakage and performance is the hardest to enhance in CPUs, C2/Penryn chips are very improved and best in this department mainly and yet K10 is 40% worse than C2 in this leakage/perf alone. This'll decide MHz/volt/heat/power level to a major level as well as the current you can feed through the chips (K10 limited to 110A total cores/20AIMC).
Can never be sure, but that's what the signs around now show. SOI.kte, so you think it does have to do with the mfg process after all?![]()
I mean, my K10 sensors stopped working since I tried for a CB. -14/15C IHS was fine but it read 0C on all cores (tcase) and 14C hottest internal (tjunction).
Since then all my cores are stuck at 0C now but the main one I need (tjunction) still reads right. However, even at those temps it made no difference to oc, so no point. If CB existed because of a thermal protection circuitry monitoring these sensors values within the cores, they'd have shut down my system the minute I drop temps on it.![]()






Reply With Quote
Bookmarks