Page 13 of 19 FirstFirst ... 310111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 454

Thread: Intel's 45nm Prices & Performance

  1. #301
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario Canada
    Posts
    256
    I called them back today to pre-order and the rep told me that they were sold out of their last shipment and put me on the next received order list?

    I guess he was a bit confused.
    Intel i7 2600k , Asus P8P67 Pro, G.Skill Ripjaws 2x4 GB 1600 Mhz, MSI GTX580, OCZ Vertex II 128 GB Extended, X-FI Fatality Pro, Pioneer DVR-212DBK, CM HAF-X, Seasonic M12D 850, Corsair H70, Win 7 64 Home Premium.

  2. #302
    Xtreme Guru adamsleath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,803
    even e8300 should rock 8.5 multi cant wait to see some.
    but only 10 bucks more for e8400?
    something very odd about the pricing.
    Last edited by adamsleath; 12-17-2007 at 07:21 PM.
    i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz

  3. #303
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    40

    Source Engine

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingcarcas View Post
    Anyone know why HL2 always gets the biggest boost?
    Source engine games are less demanding on the graphics card than most current games. They scale better with CPU bumps because the graphics card isn't as much of a factor. Yes, I did just pull that out of my @$$, but I still think it's true.

    When I moved from a 7600GT 256MB to an 8800GT 512MB, the difference in the Orange Box performance was not really noticeable. You really have to hand it to ValvE for making games that run well even if you can't afford the latest hardware.
    Core 2 Duo E6300 @2.8GHz(400x7)1.31v Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 rev. 2.0 Thermaltake TMG i1 2GB Geil DDR2-800 (4-4-4-12) @1.8vEVGA 8800GT @ 675/1687/1950 Thermaltake Toughpower Cable Management 750W PSU

    "Fool me once, shame on, shame on you. Fool me...can't get fooled again."

  4. #304
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by _g0 View Post
    Source engine games are less demanding on the graphics card than most current games. They scale better with CPU bumps because the graphics card isn't as much of a factor. Yes, I did just pull that out of my @$$, but I still think it's true.

    When I moved from a 7600GT 256MB to an 8800GT 512MB, the difference in the Orange Box performance was not really noticeable. You really have to hand it to ValvE for making games that run well even if you can't afford the latest hardware.
    Yepp! I noticed this as well on ATI cards. I went from an X1800 256MB to a 3870 512MB and Halflife 2 didn't seem much faster as almost all of my others Games exept Crysis.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  5. #305
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,730
    According to Charlie Intel has some issues with the 45nm process ramp up.

    http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...irl-intel-45nm

    To cut it short , he's saying : there might be problems with the 45nm process , there might be not.If there are , I've told you so , if they aren't I've told you so too.
    Talk about quality journalism.

    AFAIK Intel started shipping 45nm parts for revenue in Q3 ( September ) they were launched mid November ( servers and XE ).
    FAB32 went online in early December with 1st lot having mature yiedls ( copy exactly method ).

    Could there be problems with 45nm process ? Could be , but I seriously doubt it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Heinz Guderian View Post
    There are no desperate situations, there are only desperate people.

  6. #306
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    dont really know if there are problems but retail availability of the

    E5420
    E5430
    E5440

    is quite good. only the lower speed and the higher speeds are still mia.

  7. #307
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by savantu View Post
    According to Charlie Intel has some issues with the 45nm process ramp up.

    http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...irl-intel-45nm

    To cut it short , he's saying : there might be problems with the 45nm process , there might be not.If there are , I've told you so , if they aren't I've told you so too.
    Talk about quality journalism.

    AFAIK Intel started shipping 45nm parts for revenue in Q3 ( September ) they were launched mid November ( servers and XE ).
    FAB32 went online in early December with 1st lot having mature yiedls ( copy exactly method ).

    Could there be problems with 45nm process ? Could be , but I seriously doubt it.
    IIRC, its called "Scattershot Reporting". For those not familier, it refers to a Scattershot shotgun with a wide burst pattern. These are used in hunting small but fast prey where only a few pellets are needed to kill the animal. The weapon doesn't have to be aimmed very accurately to be assured a kill.

    So then when one of the many statements "scattershot" are correct, they can say see, we were right!
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  8. #308
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    3,200
    Quote Originally Posted by savantu View Post
    According to Charlie Intel has some issues with the 45nm process ramp up.

    http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...irl-intel-45nm

    To cut it short , he's saying : there might be problems with the 45nm process , there might be not.If there are , I've told you so , if they aren't I've told you so too.
    Talk about quality journalism.

    AFAIK Intel started shipping 45nm parts for revenue in Q3 ( September ) they were launched mid November ( servers and XE ).
    FAB32 went online in early December with 1st lot having mature yiedls ( copy exactly method ).

    Could there be problems with 45nm process ? Could be , but I seriously doubt it.
    There's a slight problem with the current shipping 45nm CPUs SUPPOSEDLY, but it's not anything to really stress about if you have one.
    "To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."

  9. #309
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
    There's a slight problem with the current shipping 45nm CPUs SUPPOSEDLY, but it's not anything to really stress about if you have one.
    There is no slight problem IMHO, sure I can't say fact. All processors have errata and this obscure one is being used as an excuse for Intel to sell off old stock and stockpile the new stuff. Wanna bet if Phenom was phenomenal that we'd be already seeing Penryn? BTW, Intel is claiming a "FSB Bus integraty problem". Let's see, that's 1333MHz while Xeons aren't having problems at 1600MHz with same processor, ummmm, strange.

    Look, if Penryn ships at Current projected prices and or MSRP's, Intel or its partners can't get better money for current products. You guys think E6600 will still cost $234 or Q6600 $279 in March-08?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  10. #310
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3

    any more information ?

    any more information ?

  11. #311
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    So. California
    Posts
    192
    all i know is i want the release date for the penryns so i can schedual the appointment for the surgeon to remove one of my kidneys and sell it for some money.
    Mobo: Asus P5E3 Pro | Cpu: Intel Q6700 @ 3.2ghz
    Gpu: gtx470 Flashed | Cooler: True 120 black edition
    Ram: G.skill 8 gigs ddr3 | Hdd: 74gb raptor, 1tb Wd
    sound: Creative X-fi Platinum, Sennheiser HD555, Z5500
    keyboard: G15 | Mouse: DeathAdder
    MousePad: Steel Series Heavy
    Monitors: 2407fpw, 2 x S2209w, panasonic 42" plasma

  12. #312
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by generalpetres View Post
    all i know is i want the release date for the penryns so i can schedual the appointment for the surgeon to remove one of my kidneys and sell it for some money.
    LOL!
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  13. #313
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Crescent Beach, B.C.
    Posts
    170
    I frankly doubt the latest "news" about the wolfdale's being delayed until Feb, along with a new E8300 cpu being released. The E8200 is scheduled to be $163 and the E8400 $183, but now stories are coming out about a E8300? That makes no sense. I think this is a hoax, and there will be no such processor being sold.

  14. #314
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    In an Octopuss' Garden
    Posts
    172
    Daddy, I want an E8500...I want one now. I never really cared for oompa loompas.
    Main Rig - i5 2500K@42x (Turbo)...2x2gb Corsair DDR3-1600...Asus P8Z68-M Pro...Corsair HX620 PSU...Hanns-G 19" LCD...80GB Intel SSD...2 x 1TB Samsung HDDs...Zalman CNPS9700...Ultra Aluminus (black)...Win 7 Ult x86
    HTPC - AMD A6 3650 stock...2x1gb G Skill DDR3 1600...Asus F1A75-V Pro...Corsair HX520 PSU...2x80gb WD Sata2 RAID0 HDD...Silverstone LC17 B...Olevia 42" LCD 1080P...Yamaha HT Receiver...JVC 5.1 speakers and sub...Win 7 Ult x86

  15. #315
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    119
    well the published release date for Wolfdales of Jan 20th 2008 is only a few weeks away, and Intel have said nothing about them being delayed so far, so fingers crossed.

  16. #316
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    delays supposedly to fix fsb issues.
    odd low clocks of these chips considering low heat.
    hmmm

    me thinks perhaps Intel might consider higher Ghz, and what the hell throw in 400fsb too. ie:

    E8200 6 2.4Ghz
    E8400 7 2.8Ghz
    E8600 8 3.2Ghz
    E8800 9 3.6Ghz

    just daydreaming..

    (most "current" Quad cores only make 430-450, so I'm guessing that's what's holding up the almighty switch to 400fsb, which IMHO would be disaster for overclocking headroom, but give Intel more marketing mumbo jumbo)

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  17. #317
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    411
    I'm disappointed with prices, and max of 8.5X divider if I don't go qx for the quads.

    Honestly, their is not 1 45nm process that I'll be able to get past 3.6Ghz in a reasonable price range. Now with 8.5 being $150 more then 8.0, there is no reason to leave a q6600, the q6600 is the winner for overclockers.

    Unless these can do 500 fsb easily, but I highly doubt that.
    System
    Intel C2D Q6600 @ 3.78Ghz 1.536V (1.55V bios)
    TC PA 120.3 , D-TEK Fusion, MCP655, Micro Res, 6 Yate Fans
    Mushkin HP2-6400 2X2GB @ 100Mhz 5-4-4-12
    Asus Maximus Formula 420x9
    4 Samsung Spinpoint 250GB SATA II in raid 0
    Crossfire HD 2900XT 512MB 900/900 1.25V
    Pioneer DVD-RW
    830 Mobo Tray, Wating on MM Duality
    PC Power and Cooling 750W , mobo/cpu/gpus/cdrom , Powmax 380W , hd, fans, pump
    Acer AL2616W 19200x1200 100Hz (75hz native)

  18. #318
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by gdogg View Post
    I'm disappointed with prices, and max of 8.5X divider if I don't go qx for the quads.

    Honestly, their is not 1 45nm process that I'll be able to get past 3.6Ghz in a reasonable price range. Now with 8.5 being $150 more then 8.0, there is no reason to leave a q6600, the q6600 is the winner for overclockers.

    Unless these can do 500 fsb easily, but I highly doubt that.
    But what if you skipped Q6600 to wait on this bad boy! Let's not forget, 3.6GHz for Penryn will still be very Kick-A$$
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  19. #319
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    411
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    But what if you skipped Q6600 to wait on this bad boy! Let's not forget, 3.6GHz for Penryn will still be very Kick-A$$
    Very true, but I would pick q6600 over a 8x penryn since with a maximus, (not sure how 45nm fsb is doing atm) and my q6600 over 450FSB is problematic and requires insane nb voltages , 470 1.75 NB isn't even stable ... , pll and fsb voltage won't help either.

    But it would def be a hard choice. I'm gonna keep hoping for a 9X model in $500 price range to appear.
    Last edited by gdogg; 01-07-2008 at 03:40 PM.
    System
    Intel C2D Q6600 @ 3.78Ghz 1.536V (1.55V bios)
    TC PA 120.3 , D-TEK Fusion, MCP655, Micro Res, 6 Yate Fans
    Mushkin HP2-6400 2X2GB @ 100Mhz 5-4-4-12
    Asus Maximus Formula 420x9
    4 Samsung Spinpoint 250GB SATA II in raid 0
    Crossfire HD 2900XT 512MB 900/900 1.25V
    Pioneer DVD-RW
    830 Mobo Tray, Wating on MM Duality
    PC Power and Cooling 750W , mobo/cpu/gpus/cdrom , Powmax 380W , hd, fans, pump
    Acer AL2616W 19200x1200 100Hz (75hz native)

  20. #320
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by gdogg View Post
    Very true, but I would pick q6600 over a 8x penryn since with a maximus, (not sure how 45nm fsb is doing atm) and my q6600 over 450FSB is problematic and requires insane nb voltages , 470 1.75 NB isn't even stable ... , pll and fsb voltage won't help either.

    But it would def be a hard choice. I'm gonna keep hoping for a 9X model in $500 price range to appear.
    Sure, but that's for Drag racers here. Many of us rather just watch the Extreme Guys do it. I don't have water like many here and just depend on a Ninja to do its Best. I don't see myself doing much with a Quad Core but might go that way anyway. I know I want at least 3.1GHz model only overclocking to 3.6GHz is fine for me. I'll still look for others to overclock it to the teeth and cheer them on as they do so. Just because I like NASCAR doesn't mean I want to get out on the track and pretend to be Johnson or Gordon
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  21. #321
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Then again, maybe the 8400 for about $200 would be better.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  22. #322
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Bay, CA
    Posts
    1,346
    When are the dual cores expected to be release?
    If it was already stated in this thread Im sorry, I didn't have the time to read through it all.

    I'm waiting for the prices to drop on the current core 2 duo's so I can get one for my new build.
    Main: oo7
    i7 920 D0 (4Ghz) || Asrock X58 Extreme
    Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600 || HIS HD 6850 1GB
    Corsair HX850 PSU || 2x Seagate 500GB 7200.12
    3x Dell E2311H 23" LED LCD (Eyefinity)


    [Flickr] - Canon 30D || 50mm f/1.8 PRIME || 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  23. #323
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    10009
    Posts
    3,628
    They are already out in new zealand.
    in us maybe by next week
    Last edited by trans am; 01-09-2008 at 10:57 AM.

  24. #324
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    119
    pre-order prices in Germany ...

    E8500 = € 242

    E8400 = € 170

    http://www.hardwareschotte.de/hardwa...0+BX80570E8500

  25. #325
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Yea the prices remind me of G0 launch where E8500 = E6850, E6750 = E8400 and E8200 = E6550 in price but now you get a higher multi for same price + greater overclockability & lower power consumption.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 01-09-2008 at 03:16 PM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

Page 13 of 19 FirstFirst ... 310111213141516 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •